Liquid biopsy for non-invasive monitoring of patients with kidney transplants

The current tools for diagnosing and monitoring native kidney diseases as well as allograft rejection in transplant patients are suboptimal. Creatinine and proteinuria are non-specific and poorly sensitive markers of injury. Tissue biopsies are invasive and carry potential complications. In this article, we overview the different techniques of liquid biopsy and discuss their potential to improve patients’ kidney health. Several diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic biomarkers have been identified with the ability to detect and monitor the activity of native kidney diseases as well as early and chronic allograft rejection, such as donor-derived cell-free DNA, exosomes, messenger RNA/microsomal RNA, proteomics, and so on. While the results are encouraging, additional research is still needed as no biomarker appears to be perfect for a routine application in clinical practice. Despite promising advancements in biomarkers, the most important issue is the lack of standardized pre-analytical criteria. Large validation studies and uniformed standard operating procedures are required to move the findings from bench to bedside. Establishing consortia such as the Liquid Biopsy Consortium for Kidney Diseases can help expedite the research process, allow large studies to establish standardized procedures, and improve the management and outcomes of kidney diseases and of kidney transplant recipients.

[1]  M. Cusick,et al.  The Current State of Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA Use in Allograft Monitoring in Kidney Transplantation , 2022, Journal of personalized medicine.

[2]  Gang Wang,et al.  Urinary mi-106a for the Diagnosis of IgA Nephropathy: Liquid Biopsy for Kidney Disease. , 2022, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[3]  J. Azzi,et al.  Novel Biomarkers in Kidney Transplantation. , 2022, Seminars in nephrology.

[4]  S. Waikar,et al.  Discovery of Autoantibodies Targeting Nephrin in Minimal Change Disease Supports a Novel Autoimmune Etiology , 2021, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[5]  Linli Li,et al.  Exosomes: Emerging Therapy Delivery Tools and Biomarkers for Kidney Diseases , 2021, Stem cells international.

[6]  R. Bloom,et al.  Beyond the Biopsy: Monitoring Immune Status in Kidney Recipients. , 2021, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[7]  P. Walson,et al.  Liquid biopsies: donor-derived cell-free DNA for the detection of kidney allograft injury , 2021, Nature Reviews Nephrology.

[8]  K. Pantel,et al.  Liquid Biopsy: From Discovery to Clinical Application. , 2021, Cancer discovery.

[9]  V. Tesar,et al.  Autoantibodies in the Diagnosis, Monitoring, and Treatment of Membranous Nephropathy , 2021, Frontiers in Immunology.

[10]  S. Mohan,et al.  Managing Patients with Failing Kidney Allograft , 2021, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[11]  A. Srivastava,et al.  Discovery and Validation of a Urinary Exosome mRNA Signature for the Diagnosis of Human Kidney Transplant Rejection. , 2021, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[12]  S. Chakrabortty,et al.  Exosome-based liquid biopsies in cancer: opportunities and challenges , 2021, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[13]  D. Brennan,et al.  Dynamic Response of Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA Following Treatment of Acute Rejection in Kidney Allografts. , 2021, Kidney360.

[14]  Z. Ni,et al.  The predictive value of urinary kidney injury molecular-1 for long-term graft function in kidney transplant patients: a prospective study , 2021, Annals of translational medicine.

[15]  R. Mannon,et al.  Avoiding surveillance biopsy: Use of a noninvasive biomarker assay in a real‐life scenario , 2020, Clinical transplantation.

[16]  Haimeng Pei,et al.  Recent advances in microfluidic technologies for circulating tumor cells: enrichment, single-cell analysis, and liquid biopsy for clinical applications. , 2020, Lab on a chip.

[17]  Xiaozhou He,et al.  A circulating exosomal microRNA panel as a novel biomarker for monitoring post‐transplant renal graft function , 2020, Journal of cellular and molecular medicine.

[18]  D. V. Veprintsev,et al.  Proteomics-Based Machine Learning Approach as an Alternative to Conventional Biomarkers for Differential Diagnosis of Chronic Kidney Diseases , 2020, International journal of molecular sciences.

[19]  P. Marquet,et al.  Antibody-mediated rejection with and without donor-specific anti-human leucocyte antigen antibodies: performance of the peripheral blood 8-gene expression assay. , 2020, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[20]  S. Gelmini,et al.  THE PRE-ANALYTICAL PHASE OF THE LIQUID BIOPSY. , 2020, New biotechnology.

[21]  Jing Yao,et al.  Predictive value of procalcitonin in chronic allograft dysfunction in kidney transplant recipients , 2019, Experimental and therapeutic medicine.

[22]  P. Marquet,et al.  Development and validation of a peripheral blood mRNA assay for the assessment of antibody-mediated kidney allograft rejection: A multicentre, prospective study , 2019, EBioMedicine.

[23]  J. Friedewald,et al.  Investigator Assessment of the Utility of the TruGraf Molecular Diagnostic Test in Clinical Practice. , 2019, Transplantation proceedings.

[24]  G. Spasovski,et al.  Complications and Risks of Percutaneous Renal Biopsy , 2019, Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences.

[25]  Gang Wang,et al.  Urinary miRNA profile for the diagnosis of IgA nephropathy , 2019, BMC Nephrology.

[26]  D. Abramowicz,et al.  Non-invasive Biomarkers of Acute Rejection in Kidney Transplantation: Novel Targets and Strategies , 2019, Front. Med..

[27]  Josep Samitier,et al.  Blood-Based Cancer Biomarkers in Liquid Biopsy: A Promising Non-Invasive Alternative to Tissue Biopsy , 2018, International journal of molecular sciences.

[28]  Y. Gorgi,et al.  The role of IL‐23/IL‐17 axis in human kidney allograft rejection , 2018, Journal of leukocyte biology.

[29]  T. Schlange,et al.  ctDNA and CTCs in Liquid Biopsy – Current Status and Where We Need to Progress , 2018, Computational and structural biotechnology journal.

[30]  Hugo A. Barrera-Saldaña,et al.  The dawn of the liquid biopsy in the fight against cancer , 2017, Oncotarget.

[31]  Yingli Sun,et al.  Application of liquid biopsy in precision medicine: opportunities and challenges , 2017, Frontiers of Medicine.

[32]  K. Dahan,et al.  The Role of PLA2R Antibody in Treatment of Membranous Nephropathy , 2017, Kidney international reports.

[33]  N. Pallet,et al.  A Comparative Study of the Predictive Values of Urinary Acute Kidney Injury Markers Angiogenin and Kidney Injury Molecule 1 for the Outcomes of Kidney Allografts , 2017, Transplantation direct.

[34]  Ashitha L. Vijayan,et al.  Procalcitonin: a promising diagnostic marker for sepsis and antibiotic therapy , 2017, Journal of Intensive Care.

[35]  J. Sninsky,et al.  Cell-Free DNA and Active Rejection in Kidney Allografts. , 2017, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology.

[36]  J. Friedewald,et al.  Rapid Biolayer Interferometry Measurements of Urinary CXCL9 to Detect Cellular Infiltrates Noninvasively After Kidney Transplantation , 2017, Kidney international reports.

[37]  S. Roedder,et al.  Molecular and Functional Noninvasive Immune Monitoring in the ESCAPE Study for Prediction of Subclinical Renal Allograft Rejection , 2017, Transplantation.

[38]  G. Yousef,et al.  Liquid biopsy: a step forward towards precision medicine in urologic malignancies , 2017, Molecular Cancer.

[39]  Jason Zhu,et al.  Clinical applications of liquid biopsies in gastrointestinal oncology. , 2016, Journal of gastrointestinal oncology.

[40]  F. Terzi,et al.  Urinary C-X-C Motif Chemokine 10 Independently Improves the Noninvasive Diagnosis of Antibody-Mediated Kidney Allograft Rejection. , 2015, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[41]  P. Nickerson,et al.  Adverse Outcomes of Tacrolimus Withdrawal in Immune-Quiescent Kidney Transplant Recipients. , 2015, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[42]  H. Mischak Pro: urine proteomics as a liquid kidney biopsy: no more kidney punctures! , 2015, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[43]  Huhai Zhang,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of PLA2R autoantibodies and glomerular staining for the differentiation of idiopathic and secondary membranous nephropathy: an updated meta-analysis , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[44]  N. Salomonis,et al.  The kSORT Assay to Detect Renal Transplant Patients at High Risk for Acute Rejection: Results of the Multicenter AART Study , 2014, PLoS medicine.

[45]  A. Kirk,et al.  Biomarkers for kidney transplant rejection , 2014, Nature Reviews Nephrology.

[46]  H. Volk,et al.  Prospective assessment of antidonor cellular alloreactivity is a tool for guidance of immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. , 2013, Kidney international.

[47]  A. Teixeira-Carvalho,et al.  Cytokines signatures in short and long-term stable renal transplanted patients. , 2013, Cytokine.

[48]  B. Toussaint,et al.  Predictive diagnostic of chronic allograft dysfunction using urinary proteomics analysis. , 2012, Annals of transplantation.

[49]  R. Gans,et al.  Plasma Procalcitonin Is an Independent Predictor of Graft Failure Late After Renal Transplantation , 2009, Transplantation.

[50]  R. Gans,et al.  High Urinary Excretion of Kidney Injury Molecule-1 Is an Independent Predictor of Graft Loss in Renal Transplant Recipients , 2007, Transplantation.

[51]  A. Yamaguchi,et al.  Possible role of autoantibodies against nephrin in an experimental model of chronic graft‐versus‐host disease , 2005, Clinical and experimental immunology.

[52]  J. Bonventre,et al.  Kidney Injury Molecule-1 (KIM-1): a novel biomarker for human renal proximal tubule injury. , 2002, Kidney international.

[53]  J. Lácha,et al.  Serum procalcitonin concentrations in transplant patients with acute rejection and bacterial infections. , 1999, Immunology letters.

[54]  Joseph V. Bonventre,et al.  Kidney Injury Molecule-1 (KIM-1), a Putative Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule Containing a Novel Immunoglobulin Domain, Is Up-regulated in Renal Cells after Injury* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[55]  R. López-López,et al.  Liquid Biopsy: From Basic Research to Clinical Practice. , 2018, Advances in clinical chemistry.

[56]  N. Liao,et al.  An updated meta-analysis , 2017 .

[57]  E. Halac [From basic research to clinical practice]. , 2011, Archivos argentinos de pediatria.

[58]  C. Parikh,et al.  IL-18 and urinary NGAL predict dialysis and graft recovery after kidney transplantation. , 2010, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[59]  A. Alavi,et al.  Opportunities and Challenges , 1998, In Vitro Diagnostic Industry in China.

[60]  J. Manson,et al.  Prospective Study of , 2007 .