AN MR BRAIN IMAGES CLASSIFIER VIA PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS AND KERNEL SUPPORT

Automated and accurate classiflcation of MR brain images is extremely important for medical analysis and interpretation. Over the last decade numerous methods have already been proposed. In this paper, we presented a novel method to classify a given MR brain image as normal or abnormal. The proposed method flrst employed wavelet transform to extract features from images, followed by applying principle component analysis (PCA) to reduce the dimensions of features. The reduced features were submitted to a kernel support vector machine (KSVM). The strategy of K- fold stratifled cross validation was used to enhance generalization of KSVM. We chose seven common brain diseases (glioma, meningioma, Alzheimer's disease, Alzheimer's disease plus visual agnosia, Pick's disease, sarcoma, and Huntington's disease) as abnormal brains, and collected 160 MR brain images (20 normal and 140 abnormal) from Harvard Medical School website. We performed our proposed methods with four difierent kernels, and found that the GRB kernel achieves the highest classiflcation accuracy as 99.38%. The LIN, HPOL, and IPOL kernel achieves 95%, 96.88%, and 98.12%, respectively. We also compared our method to those from literatures in the last decade, and the results showed our DWT+PCA+KSVM with GRB kernel still achieved the best accurate classiflcation results. The averaged processing time for a 256£256 size image on a laptop of P4 IBM with 3GHz processor and 2GB RAM is 0.0448s. From the experimental data, our method was efiective and rapid. It could be applied to the fleld of MR brain image classiflcation and can assist the doctors to diagnose where a patient is normal or abnormal to certain degrees.

[1]  Elisa Francomano,et al.  A WAVELET OPERATOR ON THE INTERVAL IN SOLVING MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS , 2011 .

[2]  T. Poggio,et al.  The Mathematics of Learning: Dealing with Data , 2005, 2005 International Conference on Neural Networks and Brain.

[3]  Ritesh K Shukla,et al.  2.45 GHz (CW) MICROWAVE IRRADIATION ALTERS CIRCADIAN ORGANIZATION, SPATIAL MEMORY, DNA STRUCTURE IN THE BRAIN CELLS AND BLOOD CELL COUNTS OF MALE MICE, MUS MUSCULUS , 2011 .

[4]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Information Science and Statistics) , 2006 .

[5]  Abdel-Badeeh M. Salem,et al.  Hybrid intelligent techniques for MRI brain images classification , 2010, Digit. Signal Process..

[6]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Brain templates and atlases , 2012, NeuroImage.

[7]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  Data splitting for artificial neural networks using SOM-based stratified sampling , 2010, Neural Networks.

[8]  Saroj K. Meher,et al.  A novel approach to neuro-fuzzy classification , 2009, Neural Networks.

[9]  Necmettin Sezgin,et al.  Classification of sleep apnea by using wavelet transform and artificial neural networks , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  Yudong Zhang,et al.  Crop Classification by Forward Neural Network with Adaptive Chaotic Particle Swarm Optimization , 2011, Sensors.

[11]  Yudong Zhang,et al.  A Novel Method for Magnetic Resonance Brain Image Classification Based on Adaptive Chaotic PSO , 2010 .

[12]  Lalit M. Patnaik,et al.  Classification of magnetic resonance brain images using wavelets as input to support vector machine and neural network , 2006, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[13]  Yudong Zhang,et al.  WEIGHTS OPTIMIZATION OF NEURAL NETWORK VIA IMPROVED BCO APPROACH , 2008 .

[14]  Vladimir Cherkassky,et al.  The Nature Of Statistical Learning Theory , 1997, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[15]  V. K. Jayaraman,et al.  Regression Models Using Pattern Search Assisted Least Square Support Vector Machines , 2005 .

[16]  M. Kolehmainen,et al.  Cow behaviour pattern recognition using a three-dimensional accelerometer and support vector machines , 2009 .

[17]  D. Gabor,et al.  Theory of communication. Part 1: The analysis of information , 1946 .

[18]  Robert Hable,et al.  Asymptotic normality of support vector machine variants and other regularized kernel methods , 2010, J. Multivar. Anal..

[19]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[20]  A. Messina Refinements of damage detection methods based on wavelet analysis of dynamical shapes , 2008 .

[21]  Nikolaos K. Uzunoglu,et al.  Theoretical Analysis of a Passive Acoustic Brain Monitoring System , 2010 .

[22]  Lorenzo Crocco,et al.  A FEASIBILITY STUDY ON MICROWAVE IMAGING FOR BRAIN STROKE MONITORING , 2012 .

[23]  Jinn-Yi Yeh,et al.  A hierarchical genetic algorithm for segmentation of multi-spectral human-brain MRI , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[24]  Lenan Wu,et al.  A New Classifier for Polarimetric SAR Images , 2009 .

[25]  Sergio Bermejo,et al.  Fish age categorization from otolith images using multi-class support vector machines , 2007 .

[26]  Felipe Cucker,et al.  On the mathematical foundations of learning , 2001 .

[27]  Varun Jeoti,et al.  A Novel Wavelet-Galerkin Method for Modeling Radio Wave Propagation in Tropospheric Ducts , 2012 .

[28]  Emmanuel Roux,et al.  Linking clinical measurements and kinematic gait patterns of toe-walking using fuzzy decision trees. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[29]  Vaithilingam Jeyakumar,et al.  Lagrange multiplier characterizations of robust best approximations under constraint data uncertainty , 2012 .

[30]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A fully automatic and robust brain MRI tissue classification method , 2003, Medical Image Anal..

[31]  F F Nobre,et al.  Comparison among probabilistic neural network, support vector machine and logistic regression for evaluating the effect of subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson disease on ground reaction force during gait. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[33]  Jesús Picó,et al.  Corrigendum to “The best approaches in the on-line monitoring of batch processes based on PCA: Does the modelling structure matter?” [Anal. Chim. Acta Volume 642 (2009) 59–68] , 2010 .

[34]  Francisco López-Ferreras,et al.  Computational load reduction in decision functions using support vector machines , 2009, Signal Process..

[35]  L. Xia,et al.  AN SUPPORT VECTOR REGRESSION BASED NONLINEAR MODELING METHOD FOR SIC MESFET , 2008 .

[36]  Claudio Pollo,et al.  EFFECT OF REALISTIC MODELING OF DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION ON THE PREDICTION OF VOLUME OF ACTIVATED TISSUE , 2012 .

[37]  Syed Ali Mohsin,et al.  CONCENTRATION OF THE SPECIFIC ABSORPTION RATE AROUND DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION ELECTRODES DURING MRI , 2011 .

[38]  Fang-Fang Wang,et al.  THE SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE FOR DIELECTRIC TARGET DETECTION THROUGH A WALL , 2011 .

[39]  André Carlos Ponce de Leon Ferreira de Carvalho,et al.  Combining meta-learning and search techniques to select parameters for support vector machines , 2012, Neurocomputing.

[40]  Yudong Zhang,et al.  MAGNETIC RESONANCE BRAIN IMAGE CLASSIFICATION BY AN IMPROVED ARTIFICIAL BEE COLONY ALGORITHM , 2011 .

[41]  Noor M. Sheikh,et al.  MRI INDUCED HEATING OF DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION LEADS: EFFECT OF THE AIR-TISSUE INTERFACE , 2008 .

[42]  Nikolaos K. Uzunoglu,et al.  Phased-Array Near Field Radiometry for Brain Intracranial Applications , 2010 .

[43]  Azlan Mohd Zain,et al.  Overview of Support Vector Machine in Modeling Machining Performances , 2011 .

[44]  Daoliang Li,et al.  Original paper: Classification of foreign fibers in cotton lint using machine vision and multi-class support vector machine , 2010 .