A path analytic test of the reading strategies mediation model: Relating cognitive competences and motivational influences to individual differences in fifth-grade students' reading comprehension

ABSTRACT This study examined a theoretical model hypothesizing that reading strategies mediate the effects of intrinsic reading motivation, reading fluency, and vocabulary knowledge on reading comprehension. Using path analytic methods, we tested the direct and indirect effects specified in the hypothesized model in a sample of 1105 fifth-graders. In addition to standardized tests and questionnaires, we administered a performance test to assess students' proficiency in the application of three reading strategies. The overall fit of the model to the data was good. Both cognitive (fluency and vocabulary) and motivational (intrinsic reading motivation) variables had an indirect effect on reading comprehension through their influence on reading strategies. Reading strategies had a unique effect on reading comprehension and partially mediated the effects that cognitive and motivational variables had on fifth-graders' reading achievements.

[1]  Allan Wigfield,et al.  Reading motivation and reading comprehension growth in the later elementary years , 2007 .

[2]  Paulina A. Kulesz,et al.  Validation of the direct and inferential mediation (DIME) model of reading comprehension in grades 7 through 12 , 2016 .

[3]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[4]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Strategies That Improve Children's Memory and Comprehension of Text , 1989, The Elementary School Journal.

[5]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Manifest variable path analysis: potentially serious and misleading consequences due to uncorrected measurement error. , 2014, Psychological methods.

[6]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Effective Reading Programs for the Elementary Grades: A Best-Evidence Synthesis , 2009 .

[7]  Randy G. Floyd,et al.  Differential Competencies Contributing to Children's Comprehension of Narrative and Expository Texts , 2008 .

[8]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Implementation and effects of explicit reading comprehension instruction in fifth-grade classrooms , 2011 .

[9]  Ulrich Schiefele,et al.  Reciprocal Effects between Intrinsic Reading Motivation and Reading Competence? A Cross-Lagged Panel Model for Academic Track and Nonacademic Track Students. , 2016 .

[10]  Miriam Alfassi.  Reading to Learn: Effects of Combined Strategy Instruction on High School Students , 2004 .

[11]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[12]  J. Brunstein,et al.  Improving students' reading comprehension skills : effects of strategy instruction and reciprocal teaching , 2009 .

[13]  Allan Wigfield,et al.  Relations of Children's Motivation for Reading to the Amount and Breadth of Their Reading. , 1997 .

[14]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Self-report of reading comprehension strategies: What are we measuring? , 2007 .

[15]  R. Slavin,et al.  Effective Reading Programs for Middle and High Schools: A Best‐Evidence Synthesis , 2008 .

[16]  C. Hulme,et al.  Phonemes, rimes, vocabulary, and grammatical skills as foundations of early reading development: evidence from a longitudinal study. , 2004, Developmental psychology.

[17]  S. Jay Samuels,et al.  Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading , 1974 .

[18]  Johannes Naumann,et al.  Working memory capacity and reading skill moderate the effectiveness of strategy training in learning from hypertext , 2008 .

[19]  Allan Wigfield,et al.  Dimensions of Reading Motivation and Their Relation to Reading Behavior and Competence , 2012, Reading Research Quarterly.

[20]  F. Prins,et al.  Learning styles: self-reports versus thinking-aloud measures. , 2003, The British journal of educational psychology.

[21]  Nina Schünemann,et al.  Integrating self-regulation in whole-class reciprocal teaching: A moderator–mediator analysis of incremental effects on fifth graders’ reading comprehension , 2013 .

[22]  B. Rosenshine,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching: A Review of the Research , 1994 .

[23]  R. Azevedo,et al.  Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension , 2007 .

[24]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Comprehension challenges in the fourth grade: The roles of text cohesion, text genre, and readers' prior knowledge , 2011 .

[25]  R. Azevedo,et al.  Measuring strategy use in context with multiple-choice items , 2011 .

[26]  Steven A. Stahl,et al.  Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. , 2003 .

[27]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Does Naturally Occurring Comprehension Strategies Instruction Make a Difference when Students Read Expository Text , 2013 .

[28]  Heejin Kim,et al.  The Simple View of Reading , 2012 .

[29]  Jens Möller,et al.  On the Effects of Motivation on Reading Performance Growth in Secondary School. , 2011 .

[30]  Nadine Spörer,et al.  competence: Analyzing effects on reading comprehension, reading strategy performance, and motivation for reading , 2014 .

[31]  S. Paris,et al.  The Development of Children’s Reading Comprehension , 2014 .

[32]  Petra Stanat,et al.  Leseleistungen deutscher Schülerinnen und Schüler im internationalen Vergleich (PISA) , 2002 .

[33]  Kathleen C. Perencevich,et al.  Increasing Reading Comprehension and Engagement Through Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction , 2004 .

[34]  Donald L. Compton,et al.  The Impact of Vocabulary Instruction on Passage-Level Comprehension of School-Age Children: A Meta-Analysis , 2009 .

[35]  Peggy Noel Van Meter,et al.  Growth of Literacy Engagement: Changes in Motivations and Strategies During Concept‐Oriented Reading Instruction , 1996 .

[36]  Kate Cain,et al.  Learning to read : should we keep things simple? , 2015 .

[37]  J. Chall.  Stages of reading development , 1983 .

[38]  Ludo Verhoeven,et al.  Vocabulary Growth and Reading Development across the Elementary School Years , 2011 .

[39]  Emily Anderson,et al.  Influences of Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction on Strategy Use and Conceptual Learning from Text , 1999, The Elementary School Journal.

[40]  T. Rasinski.  Reading fluency instruction: Moving beyond accuracy, automaticity, and prosody , 2006 .

[41]  John T. Guthrie,et al.  Motivational and Cognitive Contributions to Students' Amount of Reading. , 2001, Contemporary educational psychology.

[42]  Steven A. Stahl,et al.  The Effects of Vocabulary Instruction: A Model-Based Meta-Analysis , 1986 .

[43]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Examining the prediction of reading comprehension on different multiple‐choice tests , 2009 .

[44]  B. Rosenshine,et al.  Teaching Students to Generate Questions: A Review of the Intervention Studies , 1996 .

[45]  Philip B. Gough,et al.  Some Observations on a Simple View of Reacting , 2013 .

[46]  J. Dole,et al.  Cognitive Strategy Instruction , 2014 .

[47]  Gene Ouellette,et al.  A not-so-simple view of reading: how oral vocabulary and visual-word recognition complicate the story , 2010 .

[48]  J. Cromley,et al.  Reading Comprehension of Scientific Text: A Domain-Specific Test of the Direct and Inferential Mediation Model of Reading Comprehension. , 2010 .

[49]  David D. Paige,et al.  Fluency Differences by Text Genre in Proficient and Struggling Secondary Students , 2015 .

[50]  Nele McElvany,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Reading Motivation as Predictors of Reading Literacy: A Longitudinal Study. , 2010 .

[51]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Examining the Reading Difficulty of Secondary Students with Learning Disabilities , 2002 .

[52]  Petra Stanat,et al.  PISA 2000 : Dokumentation der Erhebungsinstrumente , 2002 .

[53]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[54]  John Mark Froiland,et al.  Intrinsic motivation, perceived competence and classroom engagement as longitudinal predictors of adolescent reading achievement , 2014 .

[55]  D. Mackinnon.  Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis , 2008 .