ATC-lab: An air traffic control simulator for the laboratory

Air Traffic Control Laboratory Simulator (ATC-lab) is a new low- and medium-fidelity task environment that simulates air traffic control. ATC-lab allows the researcher to study human performance of tasks under tightly controlled experimental conditions in a dynamic, spatial environment. The researcher can create standardized air traffic scenarios by manipulating a wide variety of parameters. These include temporal and spatial variables. There are two main versions of ATC-lab. The medium-fidelity simulator provides a simplified version of en route air traffic control, requiring participants to visually search a screen and both recognize and resolve conflicts so that adequate separation is maintained between all aircraft. The low-fidelity simulator presents pairs of aircraft in isolation, controlling the participant’s focus of attention, which provides a more systematic measurement of conflict recognition and resolution performance. Preliminary studies have demonstrated that ATC-lab is a flexible tool for applied cognition research.

[1]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  The Role of the Air Traffic Controller in Future Air Traffic Management: An Empirical Study of Active Control versus Passive Monitoring , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[2]  H Stanislaw,et al.  Calculation of signal detection theory measures , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[3]  Shayne Loft,et al.  The influence of memory for prior instances on performance in a conflict detection task. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[4]  Gillian B. Yeo,et al.  A multilevel analysis of effort, practice, and performance: effects; of ability, conscientiousness, and goal orientation. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  Paul Milgram,et al.  Combining Time and Intensity Effects in Assessing Operator Information-Processing Load , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[6]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Overcoming Representational Errors in Complex Environments , 2000, Hum. Factors.

[7]  Donald A. Hantula,et al.  Microworlds for experimental research: Having your (control and collection) cake, and realism too , 1998 .

[8]  Roger Remington,et al.  Prospective memory in dynamic environments: Effects of load, delay, and phonological rehearsal , 2001, Memory.

[9]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Flight to the Future: Human Factors in Air Traffic Control Edited by Christopher D. Wickens, Anne S. Mavor, & James P. McGee 1997, 368 pages, $44.95. Washington, DC: National Academy Press ISBN 0-309-05637-3 , 1997 .

[10]  Shayne Loft,et al.  Learning and Transfer in an Applied Visual Spatial Task , 2002 .

[11]  P. Ackerman Predicting individual differences in complex skill acquisition: dynamics of ability determinants. , 1992, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  B. Brehmer,et al.  Experiments with computer-simulated microworlds: Escaping both the narrow straits of the laboratory and the deep blue sea of the field study , 1993 .

[13]  Mary M. Omodei,et al.  The Fire Chief microworld generating program: An illustration of computer-simulated microworlds as an experimental paradigm for studying complex decision-making behavior , 1995 .

[14]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. , 1999, Psychological review.

[15]  Eric Ruthruff,et al.  Visual Search in Complex Displays: Factors Affecting Conflict Detection by Air Traffic Controllers , 2000, Hum. Factors.