The transition to reliability-based design (RBD) of foundations has not been smooth. Design engineers do not necessarily object to RBD. Instead, they are concerned that the new design process restricts or eliminates their flexibility to mod- ify the process depending on site- or project-specific conditions. The broad issues that relate to these concerns are discussed, and an effort is made to clarify some key points that illustrate the strengths and weaknesses of RBD implementations. ABSTRACT: The transition to reliability-based design (RBD) of foundations has not been smooth. Design engineers do not necessarily object to RBD. Instead, they are concerned that the new design process restricts or eliminates their flexibility to mod- ify the process depending on site- or project-specific conditions. The broad issues that relate to these concerns are discussed, and an effort is made to clarify some key points that illustrate the strengths and weaknesses of RBD implementations.
[1]
Kok-Kwang Phoon,et al.
Reliability-Based Design of Foundations for Transmission Line Structures
,
2006
.
[2]
Kok-Kwang Phoon,et al.
Multiple Resistance Factor Design for Shallow Transmission Line Structure Foundations
,
2003
.
[3]
Kok-Kwang Phoon,et al.
Evaluation of Geotechnical Property Variability
,
1999
.
[4]
Kok-Kwang Phoon,et al.
Practical Reliability-Based Design Approach for Foundation Engineering
,
1996
.
[5]
K. Phoon,et al.
Characterization of Geotechnical Variability
,
1999
.
[6]
Kok-Kwang Phoon,et al.
Development of a reliability-based design framework for transmission line structure foundations
,
2003
.
[7]
Kok-Kwang Phoon,et al.
Some Critical Issues in Geo-RBD Calibrations for Foundations
,
2006
.