Differential Activity of PARP Inhibitors in BRCA1- Versus BRCA2-Altered Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE Two poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (olaparib and rucaparib) are US Food and Drug Administration–approved for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) harboring BRCA1/2 mutations, but the relative efficacy of PARP inhibition in BRCA1- versus BRCA2-altered mCRPC is understudied. METHODS We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis involving 12 sites. We collected genomic and clinical data from 123 patients with BRCA1/2-altered mCRPC who were treated with PARP inhibitors. The primary efficacy end point was the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (≥ 50% PSA decline) rate. Secondary end points were PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), clinical or radiographic PFS, and overall survival. We compared clinical outcomes, and other genomic characteristics, among BRCA1- versus BRCA2-altered mCRPC. RESULTS A total of 123 patients (13 BRCA1 and 110 BRCA2) were included. PARP inhibitors used were olaparib (n = 116), rucaparib (n = 3), talazoparib (n = 2), and veliparib (n = 2). At diagnosis, 72% of patients had Gleason 8-10 disease. BRCA1 patients were more likely to have metastatic disease at presentation (69% v 37%; P = .04). Age, baseline PSA, metastatic distribution, and types of previous systemic therapies were similar between groups. There were equal proportions of germline mutations (51% v 46%; P = .78) in both groups. BRCA1 patients had more monoallelic (56% v 41%; P = .49) and concurrent TP53 (55% v 36%; P = .32) mutations. PSA50 responses in BRCA1- versus BRCA2-altered patients were 23% versus 63%, respectively (P = .01). BRCA2 patients achieved longer PSA-PFS (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 0.92 to 4.09; P = .08), PFS (HR, 2.08; 95% CI, 0.99 to 4.40; P = .05), and overall survival (HR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.32 to 6.83; P = .008). Biallelic (compared with monoallelic) mutations, truncating (compared with missense) mutations, and absence of a concurrent TP53 mutation were associated with PARP inhibitor sensitivity. CONCLUSION PARP inhibitor efficacy is diminished in BRCA1- versus BRCA2-altered mCRPC. This is not due to an imbalance in germline mutations but might be related to more monoallelic mutations and/or concurrent TP53 alterations in the BRCA1 group.

[1]  F. Saad,et al.  Survival with Olaparib in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  E. Antonarakis,et al.  BRCA1 Versus BRCA2 and PARP Inhibitor Sensitivity in Prostate Cancer: More Different Than Alike? , 2020, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  E. Antonarakis,et al.  When and How to Use PARP Inhibitors in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature with an Update on On-Going Trials. , 2020, European urology oncology.

[4]  C. Higano,et al.  Rucaparib in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Harboring a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Gene Alteration , 2020, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  A. Tutt,et al.  Clinical BRCA1/2 reversion analysis identifies hotspot mutations and predicted neoantigens associated with therapy resistance. , 2020, Cancer discovery.

[6]  W. Foulkes,et al.  Etiologic Index - A Case-Only Measure of BRCA1/2-Associated Cancer Risk. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  N. Agarwal,et al.  Association of SPOP Mutations with Outcomes in Men with De Novo Metastatic Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer. , 2020, European urology.

[8]  E. Antonarakis Olaparib for DNA repair-deficient prostate cancer — one for all, or all for one? , 2020, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[9]  J. Gregg,et al.  Pan-Cancer Analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genomic Alterations and Their Association With Genomic Instability as Measured by Genome-Wide Loss of Heterozygosity , 2020, JCO precision oncology.

[10]  F. Saad,et al.  Olaparib for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  F. Feng,et al.  Non-BRCA DNA Damage Repair Gene Alterations and Response to the PARP Inhibitor Rucaparib in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Analysis From the Phase II TRITON2 Study , 2020, Clinical Cancer Research.

[12]  P. Kantoff,et al.  Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer: Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2019. , 2020, European urology.

[13]  N. Tunariu,et al.  Genomics of lethal prostate cancer at diagnosis and castration resistance , 2019, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[14]  E. Antonarakis,et al.  Differential Response to Olaparib Treatment Among Men with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Harboring BRCA1 or BRCA2 Versus ATM Mutations. , 2019, European urology.

[15]  N. Socci,et al.  Tumour lineage shapes BRCA-mediated phenotypes , 2019, Nature.

[16]  J. Gregg,et al.  Prospective Comprehensive Genomic Profiling of Primary and Metastatic Prostate Tumors , 2019, JCO precision oncology.

[17]  Yi Mi Wu,et al.  Genomic correlates of clinical outcome in advanced prostate cancer , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  E. Gallardo,et al.  PROREPAIR-B: A Prospective Cohort Study of the Impact of Germline DNA Repair Mutations on the Outcomes of Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. , 2019, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  Jun Luo,et al.  PARP inhibition — not all gene mutations are created equal , 2018, Nature Reviews Urology.

[20]  M. Rubin,et al.  SPOP-Mutated/CHD1-Deleted Lethal Prostate Cancer and Abiraterone Sensitivity , 2018, Clinical Cancer Research.

[21]  Yi Mi Wu,et al.  The long tail of oncogenic drivers in prostate cancer , 2018, Nature Genetics.

[22]  M. Nykter,et al.  Circulating Tumor DNA Genomics Correlate with Resistance to Abiraterone and Enzalutamide in Prostate Cancer. , 2018, Cancer discovery.

[23]  H. Wu,et al.  CHD1 loss sensitizes prostate cancer to DNA damaging therapy by promoting error-prone double-strand break repair , 2017, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[24]  Zachary J. Heins,et al.  Prospective Genomic Profiling of Prostate Cancer Across Disease States Reveals Germline and Somatic Alterations That May Affect Clinical Decision Making. , 2017, JCO precision oncology.

[25]  Oliver Sartor,et al.  Trial Design and Objectives for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Updated Recommendations From the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  A. Ashworth,et al.  DNA Repair Deficiency Is Common in Advanced Prostate Cancer: New Therapeutic Opportunities. , 2016, The oncologist.

[27]  Ahmet Zehir,et al.  Inherited DNA-Repair Gene Mutations in Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  Alan Ashworth,et al.  Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy , 2005, Nature.