Managing Service Systems with an Offline Waiting Option and Customer Abandonment

Many service providers offer customers the choice of either waiting in a line or going offline and returning at a dynamically determined future time. The best-known example is the FASTPASS® system at Disneyland. To operate such a system, the service provider must make an upfront decision on how to allocate service capacity between the two lines. Then, during system operation, he must provide estimates of the waiting times for both lines to each arriving customer. The estimation of offline waiting times is complicated by the fact that some offline customers do not return for service at their appointed time. We show that when demand is large and service is fast, for any fixed-capacity allocation decision, the two-dimensional process tracking the number of customers waiting in a line and offline collapses to one dimension, and we characterize the one-dimensional limit process as a reflected diffusion with linear drift. The analytic tractability of this one-dimensional limit process allows us to solve for the capacity allocation that minimizes average cost when there are costs associated with customer abandonments and queueing. We further show that in this limit regime, a simple scheme based on Little's Law to dynamically estimate in line and offline wait times is effective.

[1]  F. Baccelli,et al.  Modelling and Performance Evaluation Methodology , 1984 .

[2]  Ivo J. B. F. Adan,et al.  Analysis of the symmetric shortest queue problem , 1990 .

[3]  P. Billingsley,et al.  Convergence of Probability Measures , 1969 .

[4]  J. Harrison,et al.  Brownian motion and stochastic flow systems , 1986 .

[5]  Reza H. Ahmadi,et al.  Managing Capacity and Flow at Theme Parks , 1997, Oper. Res..

[6]  W. Whitt,et al.  PIECEWISE-LINEAR DIFFUSION PROCESSES , 1995 .

[7]  D. Norman THE PSYCHOLOGY OF WAITING LINES , 2008 .

[8]  Constantinos Maglaras,et al.  Decision , Risk and Operations Working Papers Series Contact Centers with a CallBack Option and Real-Time Delay Information , 2004 .

[9]  Sunil Kumar,et al.  Self-Interested Routing in Queueing Networks , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[10]  A. Rafaeli,et al.  Numbers or apologies? Customer reactions to telephone waiting time fillers. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  A. Puhalskii On the Invariance Principle for the First Passage Time , 1994, Math. Oper. Res..

[12]  Gabriel R. Bitran,et al.  OM Forum - Managing Customer Experiences: Perspectives on the Temporal Aspects of Service Encounters , 2008, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[13]  Thomas W. Mastaglio,et al.  Simulation applied to theme park management , 1998, 1998 Winter Simulation Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36274).

[14]  W. Whitt,et al.  Improving Service by Informing Customers About Anticipated Delays , 1999 .

[15]  Shirley Taylor Waiting for Service: The Relationship between Delays and Evaluations of Service , 1994 .

[16]  Erica L. Plambeck,et al.  A Multiclass Queue in Heavy Traffic with Throughput Time Constraints: Asymptotically Optimal Dynamic Controls , 2001, Queueing Syst. Theory Appl..

[17]  Martin I. Reiman,et al.  Some diffusion approximations with state space collapse , 1984 .

[18]  H. McKean,et al.  Two queues in parallel , 1977 .

[19]  S. Shreve,et al.  An explicit formula for the Skorokhod map on [0,a]. , 2007, 0710.2977.

[20]  Avishai Mandelbaum,et al.  A model for rational abandonments from invisible queues , 2000, Queueing Syst. Theory Appl..

[21]  Robert C. Ford,et al.  Managing Real and Virtual Waits in Hospitality and Service Organizations , 2005 .

[22]  Ward Whitt,et al.  Fluid Models for Multiserver Queues with Abandonments , 2006, Oper. Res..

[23]  Constantinos Maglaras,et al.  On Customer Contact Centers with a Call-Back Option: Customer Decisions, Routing Rules, and System Design , 2004, Oper. Res..

[24]  W. Oi A Disneyland Dilemma: Two-Part Tariffs for a Mickey Mouse Monopoly , 1971 .