A glimpse into real-world kitchens: Improving our understanding of cookstove usage through in-field photo-observations and improved cooking event detection (CookED) analytics

Abstract The combustion of solid fuels in residential cookstoves is a global health and climate issue, and expanded use of improved cookstoves could have significant benefits locally and globally. Evaluating impacts of improved cookstove programs requires more accurately measuring stove use patterns. This work builds on and improves existing stove use monitoring methods. First, we introduce and describe a novel, in-field photo-observation sampling method designed to capture near-continuous, real-world, ground-truth stove usage information. These measurements are used to validate predictions made by electronic stove use monitors (SUMs). Second, we present Cooking Event Detector (CookED), a SUM algorithm that translates stove-temperature measurements into classifications of cooking or not-cooking. The predictive performance of the new algorithm is evaluated using results from the photo-observations and compared to existing algorithms. CookED demonstrates considerable improvement over some methods for all five types of improved and traditional stoves monitored in the study. Overall minute-level predictive accuracy of CookED ranges from 95.6% to 98.4%, depending on the stove type, while Matthews correlation coefficients range from 72.8% to 88.3%. Comparisons between predicted and observed average cooking event durations show high correlation (Pearson's r = 0.85). These methods can be applied in a wide variety of applications, including research studies linking behavior, technology, exposure, and human and environmental health, as well as operational programs that aim to scale up improved cookstove adoption and quantify benefits.

[1]  Christine Wiedinmyer,et al.  Assessment of cookstove stacking in Northern Ghana using surveys and stove use monitors , 2016 .

[2]  Katherine L. Dickinson,et al.  Kitchen Area Air Quality Measurements in Northern Ghana: Evaluating the Performance of a Low-Cost Particulate Sensor within a Household Energy Study , 2019, Atmosphere.

[3]  W. Checkley,et al.  Perceptions of Improved Biomass and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Stoves in Puno, Peru: Implications for Promoting Sustained and Exclusive Adoption of Clean Cooking Technologies , 2017, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[4]  Katherine L. Dickinson,et al.  Attributing Air Pollutant Exposure to Emission Sources with Proximity Sensing , 2019, Atmosphere.

[5]  L. Moulton,et al.  Beyond cost: Exploring fuel choices and the socio-cultural dynamics of liquefied petroleum gas stove adoption in Peru. , 2020, Energy research & social science.

[6]  Omar Masera,et al.  Patterns of Stove Use in the Context of Fuel–Device Stacking: Rationale and Implications , 2015, EcoHealth.

[7]  Daniel L. Wilson,et al.  Comparing Cookstove Usage Measured with Sensors Versus Cell Phone-Based Surveys in Darfur, Sudan , 2015 .

[8]  Samuel Soledayo Babatola Global burden of diseases attributable to air pollution , 2018, Journal of public health in Africa.

[9]  Eduardo Canuz,et al.  Temperature dataloggers as stove use monitors (SUMs): Field methods and signal analysis. , 2012, Biomass & bioenergy.

[10]  Sumi Mehta,et al.  Millions dead: how do we know and what does it mean? Methods used in the comparative risk assessment of household air pollution. , 2014, Annual review of public health.

[11]  S. Schrag,et al.  Effectiveness of Six Improved Cookstoves in Reducing Household Air Pollution and Their Acceptability in Rural Western Kenya , 2016, PloS one.

[12]  Dan J Stein,et al.  Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 , 2020, Lancet.

[13]  K. Balakrishnan,et al.  Comparing regional stove usage patterns and using those patterns to model indoor air quality impacts. , 2020, Indoor air.

[14]  Narendra K. Arora,et al.  Patterns of Stove Usage after Introduction of an Advanced Cookstove: The Long-Term Application of Household Sensors , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  Kwasi Boateng,et al.  A Review of In-Situ and Remote Sensing Technologies to Monitor Water and Sanitation Interventions , 2018, Water.

[16]  Amit Gandhi,et al.  Measuring usage and adoption of improved cookstoves in ugandan households using quantitative and qualitative methods , 2016, 2016 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC).

[17]  Katherine L. Dickinson,et al.  Everybody Stacks: Lessons from household energy case studies to inform design principles for clean energy transitions. , 2020, Energy policy.

[18]  K. Balakrishnan,et al.  A Low-Cost Stove Use Monitor to Enable Conditional Cash Transfers , 2018, EcoHealth.

[19]  Sensor data to measure Hawthorne effects in cookstove evaluation , 2018, Data in brief.

[20]  Katherine L. Dickinson,et al.  Research on Emissions, Air quality, Climate, and Cooking Technologies in Northern Ghana (REACCTING): study rationale and protocol , 2015, BMC Public Health.

[21]  Eduardo Canuz,et al.  Quantitative metrics of stove adoption using Stove Use Monitors (SUMs). , 2013, Biomass & bioenergy.

[22]  N. Ramanathan,et al.  Laboratory demonstration and field verification of a Wireless Cookstove Sensing System (WiCS) for determining cooking duration and fuel consumption , 2014 .

[23]  Katherine L. Dickinson,et al.  Prices, peers, and perceptions (P3): study protocol for improved biomass cookstove project in northern Ghana , 2018, BMC Public Health.

[24]  Katherine L. Dickinson,et al.  Adoption of improved biomass stoves and stove/fuel stacking in the REACCTING intervention study in Northern Ghana , 2019, Energy Policy.

[25]  J. Jaime Miranda,et al.  Behavioral Attitudes and Preferences in Cooking Practices with Traditional Open-Fire Stoves in Peru, Nepal, and Kenya: Implications for Improved Cookstove Interventions , 2014, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[26]  Matthew L. Thomas,et al.  Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015 , 2017, The Lancet.

[27]  A. Sullivan,et al.  Chemical Composition and Emissions Factors for Cookstove Startup (Ignition) Materials. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[28]  D. Chicco,et al.  The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation , 2020, BMC Genomics.

[29]  J. Balmes Household air pollution from domestic combustion of solid fuels and health. , 2019, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[30]  Daniel M. Kammen,et al.  From Linear Fuel Switching to Multiple Cooking Strategies: A Critique and Alternative to the Energy Ladder Model , 2000 .

[31]  David I. Levine,et al.  Comparing methods for signal analysis of temperature readings from stove use monitors. , 2014 .

[32]  David I. Levine,et al.  Using Unobtrusive Sensors to Measure and Minimize Hawthorne Effects: Evidence from Cookstoves , 2017 .

[33]  Michael Johnson,et al.  Small, Smart, Fast, and Cheap: Microchip-Based Sensors to Estimate Air Pollution Exposures in Rural Households , 2017, Sensors.

[34]  Lirije Hyseni,et al.  The Role of Mixed Methods in Improved Cookstove Research , 2015, Journal of health communication.

[35]  Ajay Pillarisetti,et al.  An Integrated Sensor Data Logging, Survey, and Analytics Platform for Field Research and Its Application in HAPIN, a Multi-Center Household Energy Intervention Trial , 2020, Sustainability.