Information, Learning, and Wage Rates in Low-Income Rural Areas

In this essay, we present evidence that employers in rural areas of developing countries have imperfect information with regard to the productivity of heterogeneous workers. In addition to obtaining direct measures of the completeness of employer information we consider the implications of information asymmetries for the structure of casual labor markets. We then evaluate the extent to which casual labor markets do, in fact, exhibit these attributes. We find that: (1) there is adverse selection out of the time-rate labor market; (2) employers discriminate statistically: given two workers with different observed characteristics but the same actual productivity, the worker from the group with the higher average productivity will have a higher wage; (3) employers exhibit learning over time: the extent of employer ignorance is negatively related to labor-market exposure on the part of the workers; and (4) calorie consumption affects productivity but is not rewarded in the time-rate labor market. In concluding we argue that an analysis of wage and employment patterns and the implications of these patterns for human capital investment in rural areas of developing countries that ignored the role of information problems could yield misleading conclusions.

[1]  D. Aigner,et al.  Statistical Theories of Discrimination in Labor Markets , 1977 .

[2]  Edward P. Lazear,et al.  Salaries and Piece Rates , 1986 .

[3]  N. Scrimshaw,et al.  Iron deficiency anemia and the productivity of adult males in Indonesia. , 1979, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[4]  Andrew M Weiss Efficiency Wages: Models of Unemployment, Layoffs, and Wage Dispersion , 1991 .

[5]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Credit Market Constraints, Consumption Smoothing, and the Accumulation of Durable Production Assets in Low-Income Countries: Investments in Bullocks in India , 1993, Journal of Political Economy.

[6]  Mark R. Rosenzweig,et al.  Consumption Smoothing, Migration, and Marriage: Evidence from Rural India , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[7]  Richard Startz,et al.  Private Discrimination and Social Intervention in Competitive Labor Markets , 1983 .

[8]  John S. Strauss,et al.  Does Better Nutrition Raise Farm Productivity? , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[9]  J. Roumasset,et al.  Piece rates, time rates, and teams: Explaining patterns in the employment relation , 1980 .

[10]  A. Weiss Job Queues and Layoffs in Labor Markets with Flexible Wages , 1980, Journal of Political Economy.

[11]  Solomon W. Polachek,et al.  Family Investments in Human Capital: Earnings of Women , 1974, Journal of Political Economy.

[12]  J. Mincer Schooling, Experience, and Earnings , 1976 .

[13]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Productivity, health and inequality in the intrahousehold distribution of food in low-income countries , 1989 .

[14]  Anil B. Deolalikar,et al.  Nutrition and labor productivity in agriculture: Estimates for rural , 1988 .

[15]  T. Walker,et al.  Village and household economies in India''s semi-arid tropics. Baltimore, Md. U. S. A. : Johns , 1990 .

[16]  Mark R. Rosenzweig,et al.  Risk, Implicit Contracts and the Family in Rural Areas of Low-Income Countries , 1988 .

[17]  L. Haddad,et al.  Agricultural Commercialization, Nutrition, and the Rural Poor: A Study of Philippine Farm Households , 1990 .

[18]  Claudia Goldin,et al.  Monitoring Costs and Occupational Segregation by Sex: A Historical Analysis , 1985, Journal of Labor Economics.