Docking study and free energy simulation of the complex between p53 DNA‐binding domain and azurin

Molecular interaction between p53 tumor suppressor and the copper protein azurin (AZ) has been demonstrated to enhance p53 stability and hence antitumoral function, opening new perspectives in cancer treatment. While some experimental work has provided evidence for AZ binding to p53, no crystal structure for the p53–AZ complex was solved thus far. In this work the association between AZ and the p53 DNA‐binding domain (DBD) was investigated by computational methods. Using a combination of rigid‐body protein docking, experimental mutagenesis information, and cluster analysis 10 main p53 DBD–AZ binding modes were generated. The resulting structures were further characterized by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and free energy calculations. We found that the highest scored docking conformation for the p53 DBD–AZ complex also yielded the most favorable free energy value. This best three‐dimensional model for the complex was validated by using a computational mutagenesis strategy. In this structure AZ binds to the flexible L1 and s7–s8 loops of the p53 DBD and stabilizes them through protein–protein tight packing interactions, resulting in high degree of both surface matching and electrostatic complementarity. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  D. Apiyo,et al.  Unique complex between bacterial azurin and tumor-suppressor protein p53. , 2005, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[2]  S. Cannistraro,et al.  Long-term molecular dynamics simulation of copper azurin: structure, dynamics and functionality. , 1999, Biophysical chemistry.

[3]  Nathan A. Baker,et al.  Electrostatics of nanosystems: Application to microtubules and the ribosome , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Qiang Lu,et al.  Exploring the mechanism of flexible biomolecular recognition with single molecule dynamics. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[5]  L. Nilsson,et al.  Effect of Zn2+ on DNA recognition and stability of the p53 DNA-binding domain. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[6]  T. Simonson,et al.  Cys(x)His(y)-Zn2+ interactions: possibilities and limitations of a simple pairwise force field. , 2006, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[7]  Sandor Vajda,et al.  ClusPro: a fully automated algorithm for protein-protein docking , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[8]  M. Cascella,et al.  Role of protein frame and solvent for the redox properties of azurin from Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  N. Pavletich,et al.  Crystal structure of the tetramerization domain of the p53 tumor suppressor at 1.7 angstroms , 1995, Science.

[10]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Interaction Models for Water in Relation to Protein Hydration , 1981 .

[11]  Hui Liu,et al.  Simulation of the interaction between ScyTx and small conductance calcium-activated potassium channel by docking and MM-PBSA. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[12]  R. Huber,et al.  Crystal structure analysis of oxidized Pseudomonas aeruginosa azurin at pH 5.5 and pH 9.0. A pH-induced conformational transition involves a peptide bond flip. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  Johannes Buchner,et al.  The N-terminal domain of p53 is natively unfolded. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  R C Wade,et al.  Blue copper proteins: A comparative analysis of their molecular interaction properties , 2000, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[15]  Berk Hess,et al.  LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations , 1997 .

[16]  A. Fersht,et al.  Regulation of DNA binding of p53 by its C-terminal domain. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  Zhiping Weng,et al.  Docking unbound proteins using shape complementarity, desolvation, and electrostatics , 2002, Proteins.

[18]  A. Levine,et al.  Surfing the p53 network , 2000, Nature.

[19]  Crystal structure of the disulfide bond-deficient azurin mutant C3A/C26A: how important is the S-S bond for folding and stability? , 2000 .

[20]  S. Cannistraro,et al.  Docking and molecular dynamics simulation of the Azurin–Cytochrome c551 electron transfer complex , 2007, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[21]  Ronen Marmorstein,et al.  High-resolution structure of the p53 core domain: implications for binding small-molecule stabilizing compounds. , 2006, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[22]  A. Chakrabarty,et al.  Apoptosis or growth arrest: Modulation of tumor suppressor p53's specificity by bacterial redox protein azurin. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  S. Hansen,et al.  Refolding and structural characterization of the human p53 tumor suppressor protein. , 2002, Biophysical chemistry.

[24]  S. Jones,et al.  Principles of protein-protein interactions. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  C. Klein,et al.  NMR Spectroscopy Reveals the Solution Dimerization Interface of p53 Core Domains Bound to Their Consensus DNA* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[26]  M Bycroft,et al.  Hot-spot mutants of p53 core domain evince characteristic local structural changes. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  A. Fersht,et al.  Structural basis for understanding oncogenic p53 mutations and designing rescue drugs , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Alan R. Fersht,et al.  Solution structure of p53 core domain: Structural basis for its instability , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  P. Kollman,et al.  Continuum Solvent Studies of the Stability of DNA, RNA, and Phosphoramidate−DNA Helices , 1998 .

[30]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  In the quest for stable rescuing mutants of p53: computational mutagenesis of flexible loop L1. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[31]  Vasu Punj,et al.  Bacterial cupredoxin azurin and its interactions with the tumor suppressor protein p53. , 2003, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[32]  M. Swart.  Density functional theory applied to copper proteins , 2002 .

[33]  D. Covell,et al.  Reactivity of zinc finger cores: analysis of protein packing and electrostatic screening. , 2001, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[34]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Comparison of the human and worm p53 structures suggests a way for enhancing stability. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[35]  J. Thornton,et al.  Satisfying hydrogen bonding potential in proteins. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[36]  P. Kollman,et al.  Computational Alanine Scanning To Probe Protein−Protein Interactions: A Novel Approach To Evaluate Binding Free Energies , 1999 .

[37]  N. Guex,et al.  SWISS‐MODEL and the Swiss‐Pdb Viewer: An environment for comparative protein modeling , 1997, Electrophoresis.

[38]  D. Majumdar,et al.  Bacterial redox protein azurin, tumor suppressor protein p53, and regression of cancer , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  J. Hermans,et al.  Unfolding and Hydrogen Exchange of Proteins: the Three-dimensional Ising Lattice as a Model , 1969, Nature.

[40]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions , 2002, Proteins.

[41]  Antonina Andreeva,et al.  Core domain interactions in full-length p53 in solution , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  Z. Weng,et al.  A novel shape complementarity scoring function for protein‐protein docking , 2003, Proteins.

[43]  G. Loppnow,et al.  A Structural Basis for Long-Range Coupling in Azurins from Resonance Raman Spectroscopy , 1999 .

[44]  S. Vajda,et al.  Protein-protein docking: is the glass half-full or half-empty? , 2004, Trends in biotechnology.

[45]  Esther Nachliel,et al.  A molecular dynamics study and free energy analysis of complexes between the Mlc1p protein and two IQ motif peptides. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[46]  D. Majumdar,et al.  Bacterial cupredoxin azurin as an inducer of apoptosis and regression in human breast cancer , 2004, Oncogene.

[47]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[48]  J. Thornton,et al.  Structural characterisation and functional significance of transient protein-protein interactions. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[49]  Anna Rita Bizzarri,et al.  Topological and dynamical properties of Azurin anchored to a gold substrate as investigated by molecular dynamics simulation. , 2006, Biophysical chemistry.

[50]  R. Norel,et al.  Electrostatic aspects of protein-protein interactions. , 2000, Current opinion in structural biology.

[51]  P. Jeffrey,et al.  Crystal structure of a p53 tumor suppressor-DNA complex: understanding tumorigenic mutations. , 1994, Science.

[52]  R. Nussinov,et al.  "Similarity trap" in protein-protein interactions could be carcinogenic: simulations of p53 core domain complexed with 53BP1 and BRCA1 BRCT domains. , 2006, Structure.

[53]  A. Gronenborn,et al.  High-resolution structure of the oligomerization domain of p53 by multidimensional NMR. , 1994, Science.

[54]  M. Goto,et al.  Induction of apoptosis in macrophages by Pseudomonas aeruginosa azurin: tumour‐suppressor protein p53 and reactive oxygen species, but not redox activity, as critical elements in cytotoxicity , 2003, Molecular microbiology.

[55]  L Wang,et al.  Molecular dynamics and free-energy calculations applied to affinity maturation in antibody 48G7. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  S. Cannistraro,et al.  Single molecule recognition between cytochrome C 551 and gold-immobilized azurin by force spectroscopy. , 2005, Biophysical journal.