Filtering effect induced by rigid massless embedded foundations

It is well recognised that the dynamic interaction between structure, foundation and supporting soil can affect significantly the seismic behaviour of buildings. Among other effects, embedded and deep foundations can filter the seismic excitation, causing the foundation input motion (FIM) to differ substantially from the free-field motion. This paper presents a theoretical and numerical investigation on the filtering effect induced by rigid massless embedded foundations. Based on the results of dimensional analysis and numerical simulations, it is shown that the problem can be reasonably described by two sole dimensionless groups, namely: (1) ωH/VS, relating the wave length of the signal to the embedment depth of the foundation, and (2) the aspect ratio of the foundation, B/H, where B is the foundation width in the polarization plane. New simplified and physically sound expressions are derived for the kinematic interaction factors, $$ I_{u} = u_{\text{FIM}} /u_{{{\text{ff}}0}} $$Iu=uFIM/uff0 and $$ I_{\theta } = \theta_{\text{FIM}} H/u_{{{\text{ff}}0}} $$Iθ=θFIMH/uff0, which are frequency-dependent transfer functions relating the harmonic steady-state motion experienced by the foundation to the amplitude of the corresponding free-field surface motion. Standard methods for using these functions in the evaluation of the FIM are critically reviewed, with reference to both static and dynamic procedures for the seismic design of structures.

[1]  George Gazetas,et al.  SEISMIC SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION: BENEFICIAL OR DETRIMENTAL? , 2000 .

[2]  H. L. Wong,et al.  Seismic response of foundations embedded in a layered half‐space , 1987 .

[3]  J. Avilés,et al.  Effects of wave passage on the relevant dynamic properties of structures with flexible foundation , 2002 .

[4]  George Gazetas,et al.  Footings under seismic loading: Analysis and design issues with emphasis on bridge foundations , 2006 .

[5]  A. M. Prasad,et al.  TRANSFER FUNCTIONS FOR RIGID RECTANGULAR FOUNDATIONS , 1997 .

[6]  Dimitris L. Karabalis,et al.  Dynamic response of 3-D embedded foundations by the boundary element method , 1986 .

[7]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Variations between Foundation-Level and Free-Field Earthquake Ground Motions , 2000 .

[8]  Jacobo Bielak,et al.  Dynamic behaviour of structures with embedded foundations , 1974 .

[9]  W. B. Joyner,et al.  Calculation of nonlinear ground response in earthquakes , 1975 .

[10]  Ioannis Politopoulos Response of seismically isolated structures to rocking-type excitations , 2009 .

[11]  Akira Mita,et al.  IMPEDANCE FUNCTIONS AND INPUT MOTIONS FOR EMBEDDED SQUARE FOUNDATIONS , 1989 .

[12]  J. Vega,et al.  On soil-structure interaction in large non-slender partially buried structures , 2013, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[13]  M. E. Naggar,et al.  Numerical Modeling of Seismic Response of Rigid Foundation on Soft Soil , 2008 .

[14]  Mojtaba Mahsuli,et al.  The effect of foundation embedment on inelastic response of structures , 2009 .

[15]  George Gazetas,et al.  4th Ishihara lecture: Soil–foundation–structure systems beyond conventional seismic failure thresholds , 2015 .

[16]  Ioannis Politopoulos,et al.  Floor response spectra of a partially embedded seismically isolated nuclear plant , 2015 .

[17]  J. Stewart,et al.  KINEMATIC SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION FROM STRONG MOTION RECORDINGS , 2003 .

[18]  Luca de Sanctis,et al.  Piles-induced filtering effect on the Foundation Input Motion , 2013 .

[19]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Kinematic framework for evaluating seismic earth pressures on retaining walls , 2015 .