The triple-bottom-line: framing of trade-offs in sustainability planning practice

Sustainability principles are at the forefront of regional planning. In Hawaii, the movement toward “sustainability” gave way to revisiting the State Plan. This paper uses a case study of the Hawaii 2050 Sustainability Plan (Hawaii 2050) to illustrate how adopting popular notions of sustainability, without critical examination of how the respective policy frames diverge or interrelate, can lead to “tautological traps.” In the case of Hawaii 2050, the “triple-bottom-line” (embedded within sustainable development) became the dominant sustainability frame during the solicitation of public input and was thus used to guide the planning discourse. The application of triple-bottom-line concepts at the level of policy and planning led to a process that polarized economic and environmental interests. While the goals of sustainable development and the use of triple-bottom-line concepts are useful for planners, we argue that they should be applied within the parameters of ecological sustainability in a US regional context, lest resulting plans continue to allow the momentum of development to override ecological concerns.

[1]  John Forester,et al.  The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes , 1999 .

[2]  P. Ehrlich.  The Population Bomb. , 1962, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[3]  Michael Gunder,et al.  Sustainability: Planning’s Saving Grace or Road to Perdition? , 2006 .

[4]  P. Healey,et al.  Changing Meanings of 'Environment' in the British Planning System , 1994 .

[5]  Patrick Armstrong,et al.  Some of the Nineteenth Century Origins of the Sustainability Concept , 2004 .

[6]  T. Fischer,et al.  Towards Sustainability: Is Integrated Appraisal a Step in the Right Direction? , 2007 .

[7]  Making Sense of Sustainable Development: Politicians, Professionals, and Policies in Local Planning , 2000 .

[8]  G. Dover,et al.  On the edge , 1993, Nature.

[9]  Patsy Healey,et al.  Planners, Plans and Sustainable Development , 1993 .

[10]  Andrew Jordan,et al.  The Governance of Sustainable Development: Taking Stock and Looking Forwards , 2008 .

[11]  M. Jun.  The Effects of Portland's Urban Growth Boundary on Housing Prices , 2006 .

[12]  John Elkington,et al.  Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business , 1998 .

[13]  Yosef Jabareen,et al.  A New Conceptual Framework for Sustainable Development , 2008 .

[14]  Edward J. Jepson.  The Conceptual Integration of Planning and Sustainability: An Investigation of Planners in the United States , 2003 .

[15]  D. Meadows,et al.  The limits to growth. A report for the Club of Rome's project on the predicament of mankind. , 1972 .

[16]  Makena Coffman.  Oil price shocks in an island economy: an analysis of the oil price-macroeconomy relationship , 2010 .

[17]  P. Berke,et al.  Are We Planning for Sustainable Development? , 2000 .

[18]  M. Neuman.  The Compact City Fallacy , 2005 .

[19]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Frame Reflection: Toward The Resolution Of Intractable Policy Controversies , 1994 .

[20]  Edward J. Jepson.  Sustainability and Planning: Diverse Concepts and Close Associations , 2001 .

[21]  D. Stone.  Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making , 1997 .

[22]  C. Sneddon.  ‘Sustainability’ in ecological economics, ecology and livelihoods: a review , 2000 .