A review of studies on green building assessment methods by comparative analysis

Abstract Green building assessment methods, which play an essential role in promoting the development of green buildings, have attracted much attention in recent years. Many studies have been conducted on the development of new assessment methods and improvement of existing ones through comparative analysis. However, there is no comprehensive study that explicitly explores these efforts. For this purpose, a systematic review of the existing literature on green building assessment methods through comparative analysis is carried out in this paper. The main contributing authors as well as represented countries and areas are investigated. The comparison rules, including the number of comparative assessment methods and high frequency assessment methods, as well as the current status of comparison topics are explored. Finally, some research opportunities are proposed for future development. The research results would serve as a useful reference for both industry practitioners and academics who are interested in the development of green building assessment methods.

[1]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  Critical analysis of green building research trend in construction journals , 2016 .

[2]  Monjur Mourshed,et al.  A critical review of environmental assessment tools for sustainable urban design , 2015 .

[3]  Giorgio Baldinelli,et al.  A comparison between environmental sustainability rating systems LEED and ITACA for residential buildings , 2015 .

[4]  D. Crawley,et al.  Comparative assessment of environmental performance tools and the role of the Green Building Challenge , 2001 .

[5]  Ian Cooper,et al.  Which focus for building assessment methods – environmental performance or sustainability? , 1999 .

[6]  Derek Clements-Croome,et al.  The development of building assessment criteria framework for sustainable non-residential buildings in Saudi Arabia , 2016 .

[7]  Yuan Yuan Li,et al.  Project Management Factors Affecting Green Building Projects: Case Study of Singapore , 2013 .

[8]  Jian Zuo,et al.  Green building research–current status and future agenda: A review , 2014 .

[9]  Appu Haapio,et al.  Towards sustainable urban communities , 2012 .

[10]  Scott E. Maxwell,et al.  Research productivity in psychology based on publication in the journals of the American Psychological Association. , 1987 .

[11]  Ayşin Sev A comparative analysis of building environmental assessment tools and suggestions for regional adaptations , 2011 .

[12]  Q. Shen,et al.  A review of studies on Public–Private Partnership projects in the construction industry , 2010 .

[13]  Ya Dong Liu,et al.  Research on Evaluation System of Green Building in China , 2011 .

[14]  Hikmat H. Ali,et al.  Developing a green building assessment tool for developing countries – Case of Jordan , 2009 .

[15]  Matt Syal,et al.  Emergence of green building guidelines in developed countries and their impact on India , 2009 .

[16]  Valeria Monno,et al.  Beyond the buildingcentric approach: A vision for an integrated evaluation of sustainable buildings , 2012 .

[17]  Amal Kamal Mohamed Shamseldin,et al.  Including the building environmental efficiency in the environmental building rating systems , 2016, Ain Shams Engineering Journal.

[18]  Chrisna Du Plessis,et al.  A strategic framework for sustainable construction in developing countries , 2007 .

[19]  Grace K C Ding,et al.  Sustainable construction--the role of environmental assessment tools. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[20]  Hae Jin Kang Development of a systematic model for an assessment tool for sustainable buildings based on a structural framework , 2015 .

[21]  Ravi S. Srinivasan,et al.  A need for balanced approach to neighborhood sustainability assessments: A critical review and analysis , 2015 .

[22]  W. L. Lee,et al.  A comprehensive review of metrics of building environmental assessment schemes , 2013 .

[23]  J. Yudelson The Green Building Revolution , 2007 .

[24]  G. F. Bennet Book reviewMulticriteria Environmental Assessment: A Practical Guide, Nolberto Munier, Kluwer Academic Publishers/Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands (2004), (320 pp., Paperback, US$ 61, EUR€ 55, GPB 38), ISBN: 1-4020-2089-9 , 2005 .

[25]  Sunkuk Kim,et al.  Sustainable building assessment tool for project decision makers and its development process , 2016 .

[26]  Appu Haapio,et al.  A critical review of building environmental assessment tools , 2008 .

[27]  Onno Kuik,et al.  Indicators of sustainable development: an overview , 1991 .

[28]  A. Chan,et al.  Review of studies on the Critical Success Factors for Public–Private Partnership (PPP) projects from 1990 to 2013 , 2015 .

[29]  Akito Murayama,et al.  Neighborhood sustainability assessment in action: Cross-evaluation of three assessment systems and their cases from the US, the UK, and Japan , 2014 .

[30]  Mi Jeong Kim,et al.  A method for evaluating the performance of green buildings with a focus on user experience , 2013 .

[31]  Rebecca C. Retzlaff Aicp Green Building Assessment Systems: A Framework and Comparison for Planners , 2008 .

[32]  Yacine Rezgui,et al.  Sustainable building assessment tool development approach , 2012 .

[33]  Libby Schweber,et al.  The effect of BREEAM on clients and construction professionals , 2013 .

[34]  Chris Pyke,et al.  Implications of trends in LEED usage: rating system design and market transformation , 2013 .

[35]  John Burnett,et al.  Benchmarking energy use assessment of HK-BEAM, BREEAM and LEED , 2008 .

[36]  Po-Cheng Chou,et al.  Adapting aspects of GBTool 2005—searching for suitability in Taiwan , 2007 .

[37]  Raymond J. Cole Shared markets: coexisting building environmental assessment methods , 2006 .

[38]  Charles Lockwood,et al.  Building the green way. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[39]  Ayyoob Sharifi,et al.  A critical review of seven selected neighborhood sustainability assessment tools , 2013 .

[40]  Neil Hirst,et al.  Buildings and Climate Change , 2013 .

[41]  Yong Geng,et al.  An Overview of Chinese Green Building Standards , 2012 .