Another Unorthodox Introduction to QCD and now Machine Learning
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] E. Metodiev,et al. A theory of quark vs. gluon discrimination , 2019, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[2] A. Larkoski. Elementary Particle Physics , 2019 .
[3] Steffen Schumann,et al. Event generation with Sherpa 2.2 , 2019, SciPost Physics.
[4] Naftali Tishby,et al. Machine learning and the physical sciences , 2019, Reviews of Modern Physics.
[5] Kazuhiro Terao,et al. Machine learning at the energy and intensity frontiers of particle physics , 2018, Nature.
[6] Eli Upfal,et al. Machine Learning in High Energy Physics Community White Paper , 2018, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
[7] D. Whiteson,et al. Deep Learning and Its Application to LHC Physics , 2018, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science.
[8] A. Larkoski. An Unorthodox Introduction to QCD , 2017, 1709.06195.
[9] B. Nachman,et al. Jet substructure at the Large Hadron Collider: A review of recent advances in theory and machine learning , 2017, Physics Reports.
[10] A. Larkoski,et al. How much information is in a jet? , 2017, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[11] Johannes Bellm,et al. Herwig 7.0/Herwig++ 3.0 release note , 2015, 1512.01178.
[12] Peter Skands,et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 , 2014, Comput. Phys. Commun..
[13] D. Neill,et al. Jet shapes with the broadening axis , 2014, 1401.2158.
[14] J. Thaler,et al. Unsafe but calculable: ratios of angularities in perturbative QCD , 2013, 1307.1699.
[15] J. Thaler,et al. Maximizing boosted top identification by minimizing N-subjettiness , 2011, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[16] J. Thaler,et al. Identifying boosted objects with N-subjettiness , 2010, 1011.2268.
[17] S. D. Ellis,et al. Jet shapes and jet algorithms in SCET , 2010, 1001.0014.
[18] F. Siegert,et al. Event generation with SHERPA 1.1 , 2008, 0811.4622.
[19]
Joseph Virzi,et al.
Substructure of high-
[20] M. Gigg,et al. Herwig++ physics and manual , 2008, 0803.0883.
[21] S. Mrenna,et al. PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual , 2006, hep-ph/0603175.
[22] V. Lemaître,et al. Studies of QCD at e(+)e(-) centre-of-mass energies between 91 and 209 GeV , 2004 .
[23] G. Sterman,et al. Event shape / energy flow correlations , 2003, hep-ph/0303051.
[24] A. Pinkus,et al. Original Contribution: Multilayer feedforward networks with a nonpolynomial activation function can approximate any function , 1993 .
[25] Kurt Hornik,et al. Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks , 1991, Neural Networks.
[26] George Cybenko,et al. Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function , 1989, Math. Control. Signals Syst..
[27] L. Lönnblad,et al. Coherence effects in deep inelastic scattering , 1989 .
[28] T. D. Lee,et al. Degenerate Systems and Mass Singularities , 1964 .
[29] T. Kinoshita. Mass singularities of Feynman amplitudes , 1962 .
[30] V. Sudakov. Vertex parts at very high-energies in quantum electrodynamics , 1954 .
[31] F. Bloch,et al. Note on the Radiation Field of the electron , 1937 .
[32] M. Keller. Qcd And Collider Physics , 2016 .
[33] J. Virzi,et al. J ul 2 00 8 YITP-SB-0831 Substructure of high-p T Jets at the LHC , 2008 .
[34] E. S. Pearson,et al. On the Problem of the Most Efficient Tests of Statistical Hypotheses , 1933 .