Bilateral Continuous Automated Distraction Osteogenesis: Proof of Principle

AbstractThe purpose of this study was to demonstrate that automated, continuous, curvilinear distraction osteogenesis (DO) in a minipig model is effective when performed bilaterally, at rates up to 3 mm/day, to achieve clinically relevant lengthening.A Yucatan minipig in the mixed dentition phase underwent bilaterally, at a continuous DO at a rate of 2 mm/day at the center of rotation; 1.0 and 3.0 mm/day at the superior and inferior regions, respectively. The distraction period was 13 days with no latency period. Vector and rate of distraction were remotely monitored without radiographs, using the device sensor. After fixation and euthanasia, the mandible and digastric muscles were harvested. The ex vivo appearance, stability, and radiodensity of the regenerate were evaluated using a semiquantitative scale. Percent surface area (PSA) occupied by bone, fibrous tissue, cartilage, and hematoma were calculated using histomorphometrics. The effects of DO on the digastric muscles and mandibular condyles were assessed via microscopy, and degenerative changes were quantified.The animal was distracted to 21 mm and 24 mm on the right and left sides, respectively. Clinical appearance, stability, and radiodensity were scored as “3” bilaterally indicating osseous union. The total PSA occupied by bone (right = 75.53 ± 2.19%; left PSA = 73.11 ± 2.18%) approached that of an unoperated mandible (84.67 ± 0.86%). Digastric muscles and condyles showed negligible degenerative or abnormal histologic changes.This proof of principle study is the first report of osseous healing with no ill-effect on associated soft tissue and the mandibular condyle using bilateral, automated, continuous, and curvilinear DO at rates up to 3 mm/day. The model approximates potential human application of continuous automated distraction with a semiburied device.

[1]  Ilizarov Ga,et al.  The principles of the Ilizarov method. , 1988 .

[2]  J. Magill,et al.  Continuous mandibular distraction osteogenesis: novel device and preliminary results in minipigs. , 2013, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[3]  A. Ayoub,et al.  Segmental mandibular reconstruction by microincremental automatic distraction osteogenesis: an animal study. , 2001, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[4]  G A Ilizarov,et al.  The principles of the Ilizarov method. , 1988, Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Diseases Orthopaedic Institute.

[5]  J. Wiltfang,et al.  A new distraction device to compare continuous and discontinuous bone distraction in mini-pigs: a preliminary report. , 2000, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[6]  Jae-Gi Lee,et al.  A Piezoelectric Motor-Based Microactuator-Generated Distractor for Continuous Jaw Bone Distraction , 2011, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[7]  R. Schmelzeisen,et al.  Distraction osteogenesis in the mandible with a motor-driven plate: a preliminary animal study. , 1996, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[8]  R. Kikinis,et al.  Range of curvilinear distraction devices required for treatment of mandibular deformities. , 2003, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[9]  Alessandro Codivilla,et al.  The Classic: On the Means of Lengthening, in the Lower Limbs, the Muscles and Tissues Which are Shortened Through Deformity , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  A. Popkov,et al.  Limb lengthening in automatic mode. , 2002, Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja.

[11]  Martin Voracek,et al.  Three-dimensional histomorphometric analysis of distraction osteogenesis using an implanted device for mandibular lengthening in sheep. , 2002, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[12]  R. Kikinis,et al.  Clinical application of curvilinear distraction osteogenesis for correction of mandibular deformities. , 2009, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[13]  J. Glowacki,et al.  Distraction Osteogenesis of the Porcine Mandible: Histomorphometric Evaluation of Bone , 2004, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  F. Neukam,et al.  Continuous and intermittent bone distraction using a microhydraulic cylinder: an experimental study in minipigs. , 2001, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[15]  Leonard B Kaban,et al.  Automated continuous mandibular distraction osteogenesis: review of the literature. , 2012, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[16]  A. Simpson,et al.  A murine model of distraction osteogenesis. , 2000, Bone.

[17]  J. Glowacki,et al.  Effects of latency and rate on bone formation in a porcine mandibular distraction model. , 2000, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[18]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Analysis of skeletal movements in mandibular distraction osteogenesis. , 2005, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[19]  E. Wolvius,et al.  Continuous versus discontinuous distraction: evaluation of bone regenerate following various rhythms of distraction. , 2009, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[20]  F W Neukam,et al.  Effects of distraction forces and frequency of distraction on bony regeneration. , 2005, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[21]  G A Ilizarov,et al.  The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  John C Magill,et al.  Automating skeletal expansion: An implant for distraction osteogenesis of the mandible. , 2009, Journal of medical devices.

[23]  F. Neukam,et al.  The Effects of Magnitude and Frequency of Distraction Forces on Tissue Regeneration in Distraction Osteogenesis of the Mandible , 2002, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[24]  A. Rosenberg,et al.  Changes in the condyle and disc in response to distraction osteogenesis of the minipig mandible. , 2002, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[25]  John C Magill,et al.  Skeletal and soft tissue response to automated, continuous, curvilinear distraction osteogenesis. , 2014, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[26]  G A Ilizarov,et al.  Clinical application of the tension-stress effect for limb lengthening. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[27]  A. Rosenberg,et al.  Microscopic changes in the condyle and disc in response to distraction osteogenesis of the minipig mandible. , 2006, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[28]  W. B. Williams,et al.  Histomorphometric analysis of the porcine mandibular distraction wound. , 2010, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[29]  A. Gosain,et al.  Complications of Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis , 2010, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[30]  G A Ilizarov,et al.  The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues. Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and soft-tissue preservation. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[31]  John C Magill,et al.  Automated continuous distraction osteogenesis may allow faster distraction rates: a preliminary study. , 2013, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[32]  W. B. Williams,et al.  BMP4 localization and PCNA expression during distraction osteogenesis of the porcine mandible. , 2012, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[33]  E Unger,et al.  Mandibular lengthening with an implanted motor-driven device: preliminary study in sheep. , 1999, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[34]  J. Barbenel,et al.  Mandibular elongation by automatic distraction osteogenesis: the first application in humans. , 2005, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[35]  B. Mathot,et al.  Histomorphometric comparison between continuous and discontinuous distraction osteogenesis. , 2009, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[36]  W. B. Williams,et al.  Serial histologic and immunohistochemical changes in anterior digastric myocytes in response to distraction osteogenesis. , 2010, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[37]  J. Glowacki,et al.  Proliferation of masseter myocytes after distraction osteogenesis of the porcine mandible. , 2001, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.