Equidistant Spectral Lines in Train Vibrations

ABSTRACT We analyze in detail the seismic vibrations generated by trains, measured at distance from the track with high sensitivity broadband sensors installed for the AlpArray project. The geometrical restrictions of the network resulted in a number of instruments deployed in the vicinity of railway lines. On seismic stations within 1.5 km of a railway, we observe characteristic seismic signals that we can relate to the passage of trains. All train signals share a characteristic feature of sharp equidistant spectral lines in the entire 2–40 Hz frequency range. For a site located 300 m from a busy track, frequency spacing is between 1 and 2 Hz and relates to train speed. The spectrograms of individual trains show acceleration and deceleration phases that match well with the expected driving profile for different types of trains. We discuss possible mechanisms responsible for the strikingly equidistant spectral lines. We search for Doppler effects and compare the observations with theoretically expected values. Based on cepstrum analysis, we suggest quasi‐static axle load by consecutive bogies as the dominant mechanism behind the 1–2 Hz line spacing. The striking feature of the equidistant spectral lines within the train vibrations renders them outstanding seismic sources which may have potential for seismic imaging and attenuation studies.

[1]  A. Kaynia,et al.  Ground vibration from high-speed trains: Prediction and countermeasure , 2000 .

[2]  Lion Krischer,et al.  ObsPy: a bridge for seismology into the scientific Python ecosystem , 2015 .

[3]  Auke Ditzel,et al.  SEISMOGRAMS OF MOVING TRAINS: COMPARISON OF THEORY AND MEASUREMENTS , 2001 .

[4]  Doyeon Kim,et al.  Seismic interferometry of railroad induced ground motions: body and surface wave imaging , 2016 .

[5]  David Thompson.  Low Frequency Ground Vibration , 2010 .

[6]  R.W. Schafer,et al.  From frequency to quefrency: a history of the cepstrum , 2004, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[7]  G. Bokelmann,et al.  AlpArray in Austria and Slovakia: technical realization, site description and noise characterization , 2016 .

[8]  Gang Li,et al.  Seismic features of vibration induced by train , 2004 .

[9]  N. Nakata,et al.  Shear wave imaging from traffic noise using seismic interferometry by cross-coherence , 2011 .

[10]  Georges Kouroussis,et al.  Benchmarking railway vibrations – Track, vehicle, ground and building effects , 2015 .

[11]  C.J.C. Jones.  Low frequency ground vibration , 2008 .

[12]  György Hetényi,et al.  The AlpArray Seismic Network: current status and next steps , 2016 .

[13]  Yeong-Bin Yang,et al.  Train-induced wave propagation in layered soils using finite/infinite element simulation , 2003 .

[14]  C. Bean,et al.  Helicopter vs. volcanic tremor: Characteristic features of seismic harmonic tremor on volcanoes , 2015 .

[15]  T. X. Wu,et al.  VIBRATION ANALYSIS OF RAILWAY TRACK WITH MULTIPLE WHEELS ON THE RAIL , 2001 .

[16]  Amadej Trnkoczy,et al.  Site Selection, Preparation and Installation of Seismic Stations , 2012 .

[17]  D. Thompson,et al.  A comparison of a theoretical model for quasi-statically and dynamically induced environmental vibration from trains with measurements , 2003 .

[18]  Geert Degrande,et al.  FREE FIELD VIBRATIONS DURING THE PASSAGE OF A THALYS HIGH-SPEED TRAIN AT VARIABLE SPEED , 2001 .

[19]  T. Kraft,et al.  A Multi-Step Assessment Scheme for Seismic Network Site Selection in Densely Populated Areas , 2015, Journal of Seismology.

[20]  Andrew J. Michael,et al.  Listen, Watch, Learn: SeisSound Video Products , 2012 .

[21]  Stefan Baisch,et al.  Nature of narrow-band signals at 2.083 Hz , 1999 .