Software Defined Architecture for VANET: A Testbed Implementation with Wireless Access Management

Toward ITS, academia and industry aim to utilize all possible radio access technologies in order to support reliable services and applications in VANETs. Thus, the inclusion of already deployed Wi-Fi networks in VANET topology is a crucial step for the next generation vehicular networks. However, the VANET topology also requires preservation of the features already offered by DSRC and the core cellular network. As a result, the coexistence of multiple different access technologies results in high complexity in terms of the control and management of the network infrastructure. To this end, software defined networking provides a promising opportunity to simplify the management and control of clumsy network infrastructures by decoupling the data and control planes in order to provide elasticity for current networks. In this article, we propose an architectural model that exploits this opportunity in order to enhance VANET with Wi-Fi access capability. Moreover, we offer a novel software defined VANET architecture that consists of soft OpenFlow switches with Wi-Fi capabilities as both roadside units and vehicles. In particular, we first investigate existing test tools and environments for software defined wireless networks and also supply a novel testbed architecture in order to provide a feasible test environment for evaluating the proposed architecture. Additionally, we propose a Wireless Access Management (WAM) protocol that provides wireless host management and basic flow admission with respect to the available bandwidth to validate the capability of the offered architecture. The observation results of the deployed testbed prove the conformity of the offered 802.11 architecture to the VANET.

[1]  Ning Lu,et al.  Soft-defined heterogeneous vehicular network: architecture and challenges , 2015, IEEE Network.

[2]  Victor C. M. Leung,et al.  Delay-Optimal Virtualized Radio Resource Scheduling in Software-Defined Vehicular Networks via Stochastic Learning , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[3]  Mohsen Guizani,et al.  Internet of Things: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications , 2015, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[4]  Cheng-Xiang Wang,et al.  Network virtualization and resource description in software-defined wireless networks , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[5]  Jun Bi,et al.  A west-east bridge based SDN inter-domain testbed , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[6]  Jiannong Cao,et al.  SDVN: enabling rapid network innovation for heterogeneous vehicular communication , 2016, IEEE Network.

[7]  Victor C. M. Leung,et al.  Distributed FlowVisor: a distributed FlowVisor platform for quality of service aware cloud network virtualisation , 2015, IET Networks.

[8]  Xianfu Chen,et al.  Software defined mobile networks: concept, survey, and research directions , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[9]  Rob Sherwood,et al.  FlowVisor: A Network Virtualization Layer , 2009 .

[10]  Antonio Corradi,et al.  The participact mobile crowd sensing living lab: The testbed for smart cities , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[11]  Antonio de la Oliva,et al.  An architecture for software defined wireless networking , 2014, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[12]  Berk Canberk,et al.  SDoff: A software-defined offloading controller for heterogeneous networks , 2014, 2014 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).

[13]  Tommaso Melodia,et al.  Platforms and testbeds for experimental evaluation of cognitive ad hoc networks , 2010, IEEE Communications Magazine.