Untangling the relatedness among correlations, part III: Inter-subject correlation analysis through Bayesian multilevel modeling for naturalistic scanning

While inter-subject correlation (ISC) analysis is a powerful tool for naturalistic scanning data, drawing appropriate statistical inferences is difficult due to the daunting task of accounting for the intricate relatedness in data structure as well as handling the multiple testing issue. Although the linear mixed-effects (LME) modeling approach (Chen et al., 2017a) is capable of capturing the relatedness in the data and incorporating explanatory variables, there are a few challenging issues: 1) it is difficult to assign accurate degrees of freedom for each testing statistic, 2) multiple testing correction is potentially over-penalizing due to model inefficiency, and 3) thresholding necessitates arbitrary dichotomous decisions. Here we propose a Bayesian multilevel (BML) framework for ISC data analysis that integrates all regions of interest into one model. By loosely constraining the regions through a weakly informative prior, BML dissolves multiplicity through conservatively pooling the effect of each region toward the center and improves collective fitting and overall model performance. In addition to potentially achieving a higher inference efficiency, BML improves spatial specificity and easily allows the investigator to adopt a philosophy of full results reporting. A dataset of naturalistic scanning is utilized to illustrate the modeling approach with 268 parcels and to showcase the modeling capability, flexibility and advantages in results reporting. The associated program will be available as part of the AFNI suite for general use.

[1]  Jussi Tohka,et al.  A versatile software package for inter-subject correlation based analyses of fMRI , 2014, Front. Neuroinform..

[2]  Paul-Christian Bürkner,et al.  Advanced Bayesian Multilevel Modeling with the R Package brms , 2017, R J..

[3]  Paul A. Taylor,et al.  Is the statistic value all we should care about in neuroimaging? , 2016, NeuroImage.

[4]  Martin A. Lindquist,et al.  Shrinkage prediction of seed-voxel brain connectivity using resting state fMRI , 2014, NeuroImage.

[5]  David Gal,et al.  Abandon Statistical Significance , 2017, The American Statistician.

[6]  Xenophon Papademetris,et al.  Groupwise whole-brain parcellation from resting-state fMRI data for network node identification , 2013, NeuroImage.

[7]  D. Heeger,et al.  Neurocinematics: The Neuroscience of Film , 2008 .

[8]  Diego Andres Perez Ruiz Statistical Rethinking: A Bayesian Course with Examples in R and Stan Richard McElreath CRC Press, 2015, 469 pages, £67.99, hardcover ISBN: 978-1-482-25344-3 , 2017 .

[9]  Paul-Christian Bürkner,et al.  brms: An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan , 2017 .

[10]  A. Gelman Analysis of variance: Why it is more important than ever? , 2005, math/0504499.

[11]  Gang Chen,et al.  Handling Multiplicity in Neuroimaging through Bayesian Lenses with Multilevel Modeling , 2017 .

[12]  Uri Hasson,et al.  Engaged listeners: shared neural processing of powerful political speeches. , 2015, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[13]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Threshold-free cluster enhancement: Addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference , 2009, NeuroImage.

[14]  Istvan Molnar-Szakacs,et al.  Beyond superior temporal cortex: intersubject correlations in narrative speech comprehension. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  Parag Chordia,et al.  Inter‐subject synchronization of brain responses during natural music listening , 2013, The European journal of neuroscience.

[16]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[17]  Jennifer C. Britton,et al.  Linear mixed-effects modeling approach to FMRI group analysis , 2013, NeuroImage.

[18]  Jessica F. Cantlon,et al.  Neural Activity during Natural Viewing of Sesame Street Statistically Predicts Test Scores in Early Childhood , 2013, PLoS biology.

[19]  John K Kruschke,et al.  Bayesian data analysis. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[20]  Sander Greenland,et al.  Remove, rather than redefine, statistical significance , 2017, Nature Human Behaviour.

[21]  Zhongming Liu,et al.  Musical Imagery Involves Wernicke’s Area in Bilateral and Anti-Correlated Network Interactions in Musicians , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[22]  C. Gaál [About hierarchy]. , 2003, Orvosi Hetilap.

[23]  D. Heeger,et al.  A Hierarchy of Temporal Receptive Windows in Human Cortex , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Gang Chen,et al.  Handling Multiplicity in Neuroimaging Through Bayesian Lenses with Multilevel Modeling , 2017, Neuroinformatics.

[25]  Po-Hsuan Chen,et al.  A Reduced-Dimension fMRI Shared Response Model , 2015, NIPS.

[26]  Aki Vehtari,et al.  Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC , 2015, Statistics and Computing.

[27]  Gang Chen,et al.  Inter-subject synchrony as an index of functional specialization in early childhood , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[28]  D. Heeger,et al.  Reliability of cortical activity during natural stimulation , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[30]  Daniel P. Kennedy,et al.  Idiosyncratic Brain Activation Patterns Are Associated with Poor Social Comprehension in Autism , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Janice Chen,et al.  Dynamic reconfiguration of the default mode network during narrative comprehension , 2016, Nature Communications.

[32]  Enrico Glerean,et al.  Idiosynchrony: From shared responses to individual differences during naturalistic neuroimaging , 2020, NeuroImage.

[33]  Paul A. Taylor,et al.  Fighting or embracing multiplicity in neuroimaging? neighborhood leverage versus global calibration , 2019, NeuroImage.

[34]  L. Nummenmaa,et al.  The brains of high functioning autistic individuals do not synchronize with those of others☆ , 2013, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[35]  Harvey Goldstein,et al.  Multiple membership multiple classification (MMMC) models , 2001 .

[36]  C. Honey,et al.  Topographic Mapping of a Hierarchy of Temporal Receptive Windows Using a Narrated Story , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  Uri Hasson,et al.  Shared and idiosyncratic cortical activation patterns in autism revealed under continuous real‐life viewing conditions , 2009, Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research.

[38]  Paul A. Taylor,et al.  Untangling the relatedness among correlations, Part II: Inter-subject correlation group analysis through linear mixed-effects modeling , 2017, NeuroImage.

[39]  Waltz,et al.  Descriptor : An open resource for transdiagnostic research in pediatric mental health and learning disorders , 2019 .

[40]  Ming Bo Cai,et al.  Representational structure or task structure? Bias in neural representational similarity analysis and a Bayesian method for reducing bias , 2019, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[41]  Christine C. Guo,et al.  Out-of-sync: disrupted neural activity in emotional circuitry during film viewing in melancholic depression , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[42]  Mikko Sams,et al.  Inter-Subject Correlation of Brain Hemodynamic Responses During Watching a Movie: Localization in Space and Frequency , 2009, Front. Neuroinform..

[43]  Hang Joon Jo,et al.  Mapping sources of correlation in resting state FMRI, with artifact detection and removal , 2010, NeuroImage.

[44]  By Enrique Vargas,et al.  Dynamic Reconfiguration , 2003, Series in Computer Science.

[45]  Christopher J Honey,et al.  Neural Correlates of Risk Perception during Real-Life Risk Communication , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  R Todd Constable,et al.  Trait paranoia shapes inter-subject synchrony in brain activity during an ambiguous social narrative , 2018, Nature Communications.

[47]  Uri Hasson,et al.  Not Lost in Translation: Neural Responses Shared Across Languages , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[48]  D. Bates,et al.  Parsimonious Mixed Models , 2015, 1506.04967.

[49]  Gang Chen,et al.  Neural correlates of developing theory of mind competence in early childhood , 2019, NeuroImage.

[50]  Bryan R. Conroy,et al.  A Common, High-Dimensional Model of the Representational Space in Human Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2011, Neuron.

[51]  R. Malach,et al.  Intersubject Synchronization of Cortical Activity During Natural Vision , 2004, Science.

[52]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  FreeSurfer , 2012, NeuroImage.

[53]  Gang Chen,et al.  Untangling the relatedness among correlations, part I: Nonparametric approaches to inter-subject correlation analysis at the group level , 2016, NeuroImage.

[54]  A. Gelman,et al.  The prior can generally only be understood in the context of the likelihood , 2017 .

[55]  Andreas Bartels,et al.  The chronoarchitecture of the human brain—natural viewing conditions reveal a time-based anatomy of the brain , 2004, NeuroImage.