How the folding rates of two‐ and multistate proteins depend on the amino acid properties

Proteins fold by either two‐state or multistate kinetic mechanism. We observe that amino acids play different roles in different mechanism. Many residues that are easy to form regular secondary structures (α helices, β sheets and turns) can promote the two‐state folding reactions of small proteins. Most of hydrophilic residues can speed up the multistate folding reactions of large proteins. Folding rates of large proteins are equally responsive to the flexibility of partial amino acids. Other properties of amino acids (including volume, polarity, accessible surface, exposure degree, isoelectric point, and phase transfer energy) have contributed little to folding kinetics of the proteins. Cysteine is a special residue, it triggers two‐state folding reaction and but inhibits multistate folding reaction. These findings not only provide a new insight into protein structure prediction, but also could be used to direct the point mutations that can change folding rate. Proteins 2014; 82:2375–2382. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Lukasz A. Kurgan,et al.  Prediction of protein folding rates from primary sequences using hybrid sequence representation , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[2]  M. Michael Gromiha,et al.  FOLD-RATE: prediction of protein folding rates from amino acid sequence , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[3]  Oxana V. Galzitskaya,et al.  Coupling between Properties of the Protein Shape and the Rate of Protein Folding , 2009, PloS one.

[4]  Jianxiu Guo,et al.  Predicting protein Folding Rate from amino acid Sequence , 2011, J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol..

[5]  Haipeng Gong,et al.  Local secondary structure content predicts folding rates for simple, two-state proteins. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  Xavier Estivill,et al.  SNPassoc: an R package to perform whole genome association studies , 2007, Bioinform..

[7]  C. Anfinsen,et al.  Studies on the gross structure, cross-linkages, and terminal sequences in ribonuclease. , 1954, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[8]  A. Fersht,et al.  The charge relay system in chymotrypsin and chymotrypsinogen. , 1973, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  C. Chothia Principles that determine the structure of proteins. , 1984, Annual review of biochemistry.

[10]  D. Baker,et al.  A surprising simplicity to protein folding , 2000, Nature.

[11]  Hui Chen,et al.  Secondary structure length as a determinant of folding rate of proteins with two‐ and three‐state kinetics , 2007, Proteins.

[12]  O. Galzitskaya Influence of Conformational Entropy on the Protein Folding Rate , 2010, Entropy.

[13]  D. Baker,et al.  Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  K. Kuwajima,et al.  The molten globule state as a clue for understanding the folding and cooperativity of globular‐protein structure , 1989, Proteins.

[15]  O. Ptitsyn,et al.  How the molten globule became. , 1995, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[16]  Oxana V. Galzitskaya,et al.  Compactness Determines protein Folding Type , 2008, J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol..

[17]  Shanran R Huang,et al.  Inter-residue interaction is a determinant of protein folding kinetics. , 2013, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  Jie Liang,et al.  Predicting protein folding rates from geometric contact and amino acid sequence , 2008, Protein Science.

[19]  J. M. Zimmerman,et al.  The characterization of amino acid sequences in proteins by statistical methods. , 1968, Journal of theoretical biology.

[20]  D Baker,et al.  Topology, stability, sequence, and length: defining the determinants of two-state protein folding kinetics. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[21]  Kevin W Plaxco,et al.  How the folding rate constant of simple, single-domain proteins depends on the number of native contacts , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Jun Wang,et al.  A computational approach to simplifying the protein folding alphabet , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[23]  W. Kauzmann Some factors in the interpretation of protein denaturation. , 1959, Advances in protein chemistry.

[24]  Jin‐Pei Cheng,et al.  Prediction of folding transition‐state position (βT) of small, two‐state proteins from local secondary structure content , 2007, Proteins.

[25]  M. Michael Gromiha,et al.  A Statistical Model for Predicting Protein Folding Rates from Amino Acid Sequence with Structural Class Information , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[26]  P. Y. Chou,et al.  Empirical predictions of protein conformation. , 1978, Annual review of biochemistry.

[27]  Menglong Li,et al.  Investigation of the proteins folding rates and their properties of amino acid networks , 2010 .

[28]  Hue Sun Chan,et al.  Competition between native topology and nonnative interactions in simple and complex folding kinetics of natural and designed proteins , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  C. Anfinsen Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. , 1973, Science.

[30]  Hue Sun Chan,et al.  Cooperativity, local-nonlocal coupling, and nonnative interactions: principles of protein folding from coarse-grained models. , 2011, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[31]  Valerie Daggett,et al.  Unifying features in protein-folding mechanisms , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  X. Xiao,et al.  Swfoldrate: Predicting protein folding rates from amino acid sequence with sliding window method , 2013, Proteins.

[33]  A. Finkelstein,et al.  Prediction of protein folding rates from the amino acid sequence-predicted secondary structure , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  M. Y. Lobanov,et al.  To be folded or to be unfolded? , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[35]  K. Dill Theory for the folding and stability of globular proteins. , 1985, Biochemistry.

[36]  Aashish N. Adhikari,et al.  Simplified protein models: predicting folding pathways and structure using amino acid sequences. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[37]  M. Levitt,et al.  Conformation of amino acid side-chains in proteins. , 1978, Journal of molecular biology.

[38]  Jin‐Pei Cheng,et al.  Differentiation between two‐state and multi‐state folding proteins based on sequence , 2008, Proteins.

[39]  Bin-Guang Ma,et al.  Direct correlation between proteins' folding rates and their amino acid compositions: An ab initio folding rate prediction , 2006, Proteins.

[40]  P. Ponnuswamy,et al.  Hydrophobic packing and spatial arrangement of amino acid residues in globular proteins. , 1980, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[41]  C. Tanford,et al.  The solubility of amino acids and two glycine peptides in aqueous ethanol and dioxane solutions. Establishment of a hydrophobicity scale. , 1971, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[42]  S. Jackson,et al.  How do small single-domain proteins fold? , 1998, Folding & design.

[43]  Jun Wang,et al.  Composition-based effective chain length for prediction of protein folding rates. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[44]  Hue Sun Chan,et al.  Spatial ranges of driving forces are a key determinant of protein folding cooperativity and rate diversity. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[45]  Jitao Huang,et al.  Relationship between protein folding kinetics and amino acid properties , 2011, Amino Acids.

[46]  H. Chan,et al.  Desolvation barrier effects are a likely contributor to the remarkable diversity in the folding rates of small proteins. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[47]  M. Levitt Conformational preferences of amino acids in globular proteins. , 1978, Biochemistry.

[48]  C. Tanford Contribution of Hydrophobic Interactions to the Stability of the Globular Conformation of Proteins , 1962 .

[49]  Jitao Huang,et al.  Amino acid sequence predicts folding rate for middle‐size two‐state proteins , 2006, Proteins.

[50]  J. Schellman The stability of hydrogen-bonded peptide structures in aqueous solution. , 1955, Comptes rendus des travaux du Laboratoire Carlsberg. Serie chimique.

[51]  R. Doolittle,et al.  A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.