Spatial autocorrelation analysis of individual multiallele and multilocus genetic structure

Population genetic theory predicts that plant populations will exhibit internal spatial autocorrelation when propagule flow is restricted, but as an empirical reality, spatial structure is rarely consistent across loci or sites, and is generally weak. A lack of sensitivity in the statistical procedures may explain the discrepancy. Most work to date, based on allozymes, has involved pattern analysis for individual alleles, but new PCR-based genetic markers are coming into vogue, with vastly increased numbers of alleles. The field is badly in need of an explicitly multivariate approach to autocorrelation analysis, and our purpose here is to introduce a new approach that is applicable to multiallelic codominant, multilocus arrays. The procedure treats the genetic data set as a whole, strengthening the spatial signal and reducing the stochastic (allele-to-allele, and locus-to-locus) noise. We (i) develop a very general multivariate method, based on genetic distance methods, (ii) illustrate it for multiallelic codominant loci, and (iii) provide nonparametric permutational testing procedures for the full correlogram. We illustrate the new method with an example data set from the orchid Caladenia tentaculata, for which we show (iv) how the multivariate treatment compares with the single-allele treatment, (v) that intermediate frequency alleles from highly polymorphic loci perform well and rare alleles poorly, (vi) that a multilocus treatment provides clearer answers than separate single-locus treatments, and (vii) that weighting alleles differentially improves our resolution minimally. The results, though specific to Caladenia, offer encouragement for wider application.

[1]  S. Wright Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, Volume 3: Experimental Results and Evolutionary Deductions , 1977 .

[2]  P. Sneath,et al.  Numerical Taxonomy , 1962, Nature.

[3]  B. Epperson,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation of genotypes under directional selection. , 1990, Genetics.

[4]  R. Sokal,et al.  TESTING INFERENCES ABOUT MICRO‐EVOLUTIONARY PROCESSES BY MEANS OF SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATION ANALYSIS , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[5]  E. Álvarez-Buylla,et al.  LIMITED SEED DISPERSAL AND GENETIC STRUCTURE IN LIFE STAGES OF CECROPIA OBTUSIFOLIA , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[6]  L. Excoffier,et al.  Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. , 1992, Genetics.

[7]  D. F. Morrison,et al.  Multivariate Statistical Methods , 1968 .

[8]  G M Jacquez,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation analysis of migration and selection. , 1989, Genetics.

[9]  K. Livak,et al.  DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. , 1990, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  B. Epperson FINE‐SCALE SPATIAL STRUCTURE: CORRELATIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL GENOTYPES DIFFER FROM THOSE FOR LOCAL GENE FREQUENCIES , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  Analysis of the spatial pattern of arthropod fauna of jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata) foliage using a Mantel correlogram , 1995 .

[12]  B. Epperson,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation analysis of the distribution of genotypes within populations of lodgepole pine. , 1989, Genetics.

[13]  G. Isac Models and applications , 1992 .

[14]  P. Smouse,et al.  Evolutionary implications of allozyme and RAPD variation in diploid populations of dioecious buffalograss Buchloë dactyloides , 1995 .

[15]  P. Knowles Spatial genetic structure within two natural stands of black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P.) , 1991 .

[16]  R. Peakall,et al.  ECOLOGICAL AND GENETIC CONSEQUENCES OF POLLINATION BY SEXUAL DECEPTION IN THE ORCHID CALADENIA TENTACTULATA , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  Jeffrey C. Long,et al.  Matrix correlation analysis in anthropology and genetics , 1992 .

[18]  R. Sokal,et al.  PEMPHIGUS REVISITED: CHANGES IN GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION BUT CONSTANCY IN VARIABILITY AND COVARIATION , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[19]  N. Waser Spatial genetic heterogeneity in a population of the montane perennial plant Delphinium nelsonii , 1987, Heredity.

[20]  J. Welsh,et al.  Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers. , 1990, Nucleic acids research.

[21]  J V Neel,et al.  The genetic structure of a tribal population, the Yanomama Indians. XV. Patterns inferred by autocorrelation analysis. , 1986, Genetics.

[22]  J. Keith Ord,et al.  Spatial Processes Models and Applications , 1981 .

[23]  J. Hamrick,et al.  FINE‐SCALE GENETIC STRUCTURE OF A TURKEY OAK FOREST , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[24]  R. Sokal,et al.  Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the mantel test of matrix correspondence , 1986 .

[25]  B. Epperson Spatial structure of two-locus genotypes under isolation by distance. , 1995, Genetics.

[26]  J. Stephens,et al.  Homozygosity and patch structure in plant populations as a result of nearest-neighbor pollination. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  G. Bertorelle,et al.  Analysis of DNA diversity by spatial autocorrelation. , 1995, Genetics.

[28]  B. Epperson,et al.  Spatial distributions of genotypes under isolation by distance. , 1995, Genetics.

[29]  J. Heywood,et al.  SPATIAL GENETIC STRUCTURE IN A POPULATION OF PSYCHOTRIA NERVOSA. I. DISTRIBUTION OF GENOTYPES , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[30]  P. Knowles,et al.  Spatial genetic structure within three sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) stands , 1991, Heredity.

[31]  J. Gower Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis , 1966 .

[32]  R R Sokal,et al.  A Test of Spatial Autocorrelation Analysis Using an Isolation-by-Distance Model. , 1983, Genetics.

[33]  J. Hamrick,et al.  Comparative genetic structure of two co-occurring tree species, Maclura pomifera (Moraceae) and Gleditsia triacanthos (Leguminosae) , 1991, Heredity.

[34]  Bette A. Loiselle,et al.  Spatial genetic structure of a tropical understory shrub, PSYCHOTRIA OFFICINALIS (RuBIACEAE) , 1995 .

[35]  P. Smouse,et al.  The use of restriction fragment length polymorphisms in paternity analysis. , 1986, American journal of human genetics.

[36]  H. Hotelling A Generalized T Test and Measure of Multivariate Dispersion , 1951 .

[37]  S. Wright,et al.  Isolation by Distance. , 1943, Genetics.

[38]  P. Jarne,et al.  Microsatellites, from molecules to populations and back. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[39]  A. Doligez,et al.  Genetic diversity and spatial structure within a natural stand of a tropical forest tree species, Carapa procera (Meliaceae), in French Guiana , 1997, Heredity.

[40]  R. Spielman,et al.  The genetic structure of a tribal population, the Yanomama indians. VII. Anthropometric differences among Yanomama villages. , 1972, American journal of physical anthropology.

[41]  Shizhong Xu,et al.  Constrained Least Squares Estimation of Mixed Population Stock Composition from mtDNA Haplotype Frequency Data , 1994 .

[42]  P. Vos,et al.  AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. , 1995, Nucleic acids research.

[43]  P. Knowles,et al.  Spatial genetic substructure within natural populations of jack pine (Pinus banksiana) , 1991 .

[44]  John S. Heywood,et al.  SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF GENETIC VARIATION IN PLANT POPULATIONS , 1991 .

[45]  R. C. Radiobiologica Abstracts of Papers read at the hundred and thirty-fourth meeting of the Society held on 11th and 12th November 1960, at the University College, London , 1941, Heredity.

[46]  N. Mantel The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. , 1967, Cancer research.