Supporting Problem-Solving in Mathematics with a Conversational Agent Capable of Representing Gifted Students' Knowledge

This paper describes a conversational agent designed to support problem solving in Mathematics. The agent's knowledge base has been structured to represent gifted students' problem solving strategies. These were students who won the Brazilian Mathematics Olympics for Public Schools, and the idea here has been to elicit and represent their formal and heuristic knowledge for problem solving. The paper describes the method for capturing the cognitive processes of gifted students in solving Math problems and the structuring of this knowledge for the conversational agent. The paper also presents the results achieved, showing that the students who used the agent to solve Math problems were fully engaged in the tasks proposed and had a better performance than when not using the agent.

[1]  Sanghoon Park,et al.  Designing Effective On-line learning Environments Using Emerging Educational Technologies , 2007 .

[2]  Thomas Rist,et al.  Employing AI Methods to Control the Behavior of Animated Interface Agents , 1999, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[3]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Cognitive and Affective Benefits of an Animated Pedagogical Agent for Learning English as a Second Language , 2006 .

[4]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 1985, Science.

[5]  Rosa Maria Vicari,et al.  Using Chatbots for Network Management Training through Problem-based Oriented Education , 2007, Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2007).

[6]  Tom Routen,et al.  Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 1996, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[7]  George Veletsianos.  Cognitive and Affective Benefits of an Animated Pedagogical Agent: Considering Contextual Relevance and Aesthetics , 2007 .

[8]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  Designing Learning by Teaching Agents: The Betty's Brain System , 2008, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[9]  M. Linn,et al.  How do technology‐enhanced inquiry science units impact classroom learning? , 2010 .

[10]  James C. Lester,et al.  Animated Pedagogical Agents: Face-to-Face Interaction in Interactive Learning Environments , 2000 .

[12]  Cristina Conati,et al.  Probabilistic assessment of user's emotions in educational games , 2002, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[13]  Martin Llamas,et al.  CHARLIE: An AIML-based chatterbot which works as an interface among INES and humans , 2009, 2009 EAEEIE Annual Conference.

[14]  E. Yalow.  On Educational psychology: A cognitive view. , 1979 .

[15]  Fred Paas,et al.  Training voor transfer van statistische vaardigheden : toepassing van een vier-componenten instructie-ontwerpmodel , 1992 .

[16]  T. Koda,et al.  Agents with faces: the effect of personification , 1996, Proceedings 5th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication. RO-MAN'96 TSUKUBA.

[17]  Scotty D. Craig,et al.  Animated Pedagogical Agents in Multimedia Educational Environments: Effects of Agent Properties, Picture Features, and Redundancy , 2002 .

[18]  Bob Heller,et al.  Animated Pedagogical Agents & Immersive Worlds: Two Worlds Colliding , 2011 .

[19]  G. Bente,et al.  Personalizing e-Learning. The Social Effects of Pedagogical Agents , 2010 .

[20]  James C. Lester,et al.  The persona effect: affective impact of animated pedagogical agents , 1997, CHI.

[21]  Leonor Santos.  Auto-avaliação regulada: porquê, o quê e como? , 2002 .

[22]  B. Bloom.  The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring , 1984 .

[23]  nominatif de l’habitat,et al.  Definitions , 1964, Innovation Dynamics and Policy in the Energy Sector.

[24]  Chih-Yung Chang,et al.  The Development and Implementation of Scaffolding-Based Self-Regulated Learning System for e/m-Learning , 2010, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[25]  Michael F. Young,et al.  Instructional design for situated learning , 1993 .

[26]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[27]  Rafael H. Bordini,et al.  Using pedagogical agents to support collaborative distance learning , 2002, CSCL.

[28]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications. , 1994 .

[29]  GulzAgneta.  Benefits of Virtual Characters in Computer Based Learning Environments: Claims and Evidence , 2004 .

[30]  Barry Smyth,et al.  Retrieval, reuse, revision and retention in case-based reasoning , 2005, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[31]  Arthur Graesser,et al.  Autotutor Learning through Natural Language Dialogue that Adapts to the Cognitive and Affective States of the Learner , .

[32]  Yanghee Kim,et al.  Pedagogical Agents as Learning Companions: The Role of Agent Competency and Type of Interaction , 2006 .

[33]  James C. Lester,et al.  Conversational Agents , 2004, The Practical Handbook of Internet Computing.