Inferring false beliefs from the actions of oneself and others: an fMRI study

The ability to make judgments about mental states is critical to social interactions. Simulation theory suggests that the observer covertly mimics the activity of the observed person, leading to shared states of mind between the observer and the person observed. We tested this hypothesis by investigating the neural networks activated while subjects watched videos of themselves and of others lifting a box, and judged the beliefs of the actors about the weight of the box. A parietal premotor circuit was recruited during action perception, and the activity started earlier when making judgments about one's own actions as opposed to those of others. This earlier activity in action-related structures can be explained by simulation theory on the basis that when one observes one's own actions, there is a closer match between the simulated and perceived action than there is when one observes the actions of others. When the observers judged the actions to reflect a false belief, there was activation in the superior temporal sulcus, orbitofrontal, paracingulate cortex and cerebellum. We suggest that this reflects a mismatch between the perceived action and the predicted action's outcomes derived from simulation.

[1]  R. Adolphs Social cognition and the human brain , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  C. Frith,et al.  Interacting minds--a biological basis. , 1999, Science.

[3]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[4]  T. Allison,et al.  Brain activation evoked by perception of gaze shifts: the influence of context , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  J. Decety,et al.  Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: a PET investigation of agency , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  A. Goldman,et al.  Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  C. Frith,et al.  Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  Theories of Theories of Mind , 1996 .

[9]  T. Allison,et al.  Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Localization of grasp representations in humans by PET: 1. Observation versus execution , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  A. Liberman,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception revised , 1985, Cognition.

[13]  J. Decety,et al.  Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta‐analysis , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[14]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Perspectives and problems in motor learning , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  J. Downar,et al.  The Effect of Task Relevance on the Cortical Response to Changes in Visual and Auditory Stimuli: An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2001, NeuroImage.

[16]  R. Turner,et al.  Event-Related fMRI: Characterizing Differential Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[17]  W Prinz,et al.  Recognition of self-generated actions from kinematic displays of drawing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  R. Turner,et al.  Detecting Latency Differences in Event-Related BOLD Responses: Application to Words versus Nonwords and Initial versus Repeated Face Presentations , 2002, NeuroImage.

[19]  K. Doya,et al.  A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[20]  V. Gallese The manifold nature of interpersonal relations: the quest for a common mechanism. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[21]  J. Ashburner,et al.  Multimodal Image Coregistration and Partitioning—A Unified Framework , 1997, NeuroImage.

[22]  M. Preul The Human Brain: Surface, Blood Supply, and Three-Dimensional Sectional Anatomy , 2001 .

[23]  M. Jeannerod The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[24]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[26]  W. Prinz Perception and Action Planning , 1997 .

[27]  S. Runeson,et al.  Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person and action perception: Expe , 1983 .

[28]  J. Downar,et al.  A cortical network sensitive to stimulus salience in a neutral behavioral context across multiple sensory modalities. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  C. Frith,et al.  Experiencing Oneself vs Another Person as Being the Cause of an Action: The Neural Correlates of the Experience of Agency , 2002, NeuroImage.

[30]  M. Jeannerod Neural Simulation of Action: A Unifying Mechanism for Motor Cognition , 2001, NeuroImage.

[31]  E. Procyk,et al.  Brain activity during observation of actions. Influence of action content and subject's strategy. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[32]  L J Boë,et al.  Visual Perception of Motor Anticipation in Cursive Handwriting: Influence of Spatial and Movement Information on the Prediction of Forthcoming Letters , 1997, Perception.

[33]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[34]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Authorship effects in the prediction of handwriting strokes: Evidence for action simulation during action perception , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[35]  R. Adolphs Cognitive neuroscience: Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviour , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[36]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  C. Moore,et al.  Intentional relations and social understanding , 1996, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[38]  J. Freyd,et al.  Apparent Motion of the Human Body , 1990 .

[39]  J. Decety,et al.  Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[41]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action recognition in the premotor cortex. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[42]  C. Frith,et al.  Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’ , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[43]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.