A myth about centre-embedding

[1]  Kenji Hakuta,et al.  Grammatical description versus configurational arrangement in language acquisition: The case of relative clauses in Japanese , 1981, Cognition.

[2]  STEVEN KRAUWER,et al.  TRANSDUCERS AND GRAMMARS AS THEORIES OF LANGUAGE , 1981 .

[3]  A. Duranti,et al.  Relative clause structure, relative clause perception, and the change from SOV to SVO , 1979, Cognition.

[4]  Mitchell P. Marcus,et al.  A theory of syntactic recognition for natural language , 1979 .

[5]  J. Hurford.  The Significance of Linguistic Generalizations. , 1977 .

[6]  R. Scott.  A MARKOV FIELD GRAMMAR FOR ENGLISH , 1976 .

[7]  E. Roberts,et al.  Speech errors as evidence for the reality of phonological units , 1975 .

[8]  G. Sampson.  The form of language , 1975 .

[9]  W. Labov.  THE PLACE OF LINGUISTIC RESEARCH IN AMERICAN SOCIETY , 1973 .

[10]  C. R. Peters.  COMMENTS ON PIERCE’S DISCUSSION OF ‘FINITE VS. INFINITE STATE GRAMMARS’ , 1973 .

[11]  I. M. Schlesinger.  On Linguistic Competence , 1971 .

[12]  P. A. Reich.  The Finiteness of Natural Language , 1969 .

[13]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[14]  Victor H. Yngve,et al.  A model and an hypothesis for language structure , 1960 .

[15]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Three models for the description of language , 1956, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[16]  A. Poebel.  Grundzüge der sumerischen Grammatik , 1923 .