Application Procedures for the Electromagnetic Borehole Flowmeter in Shallow Unconfined Aquifers

It is increasingly common for the electromagnetic borehole flowmeter (EBF) to he used to measure hydraulic conductivity (K) distributions in subsurface flow systems. Past applications involving the EBF have been made mostly in confined aquifers (Kabala 1994; Boman et al. 1997; Podgorney and Ritzi 1997; Ruud and Kabala 1997a, 1997b; Flach et al. 2000), and it has been common to set up a flow field around a test well using a small pump that is located near the top of the well screen (Mob, and Young 1993). In thin, unconfined aquifers that exhibit ground water tables near the ground surface and that undergo drawdown during pumping, such a configuration can be problematical because pumping and associated drawdown may effectively isolate the upper portion of the aquifer from the flowmeter. In these instances, a steady-state flow field in the vicinity of the test well may be created using injection rather than pumping, allowing for testing in the otherwise isolated upper portion of the aquifer located near the initial water table position. Using procedures developed by Molz and Young (1993), which were modified for an injection mode application, testing was conducted to determine whether or not the injection mode would provide useful information in a shallow, unconfined aquifer that required the collection of data near the initial water table position. Results indicated that the injection mode for the EBF was well suited for this objective.

[1]  Capture Zone Geometry in a Fractured Carbonate Aquifer , 1997 .

[2]  Hubert S. Pearson,et al.  The Electromagnetic Borehole Flowmeter: Description and Application , 1995 .

[3]  Z. Kabala,et al.  Response of a partially penetrating well in a heterogeneous aquifer: integrated well-face flux vs. uniform well-face flux boundary conditions , 1997 .

[4]  Fred J. Molz,et al.  Borehole Flowmeter Application in Fluvial Sediments: Methodology, Results, and Assessment , 1997 .

[5]  Fred J. Molz,et al.  The Impeller Meter for measuring aquifer permeability variations: Evaluation and comparison with other tests , 1989 .

[6]  Randall T. Hanson,et al.  Combined use of flowmeter and time-drawdown data to estimate hydraulic conductivities in layered aquifer systems , 1996 .

[7]  S. C. Young,et al.  Borehole flowmeters: field application and data analysis , 1994 .

[8]  Fred J. Molz,et al.  In‐Well Hydraulics of the Electromagnetic Borehole Flowmeter: Further Studies , 2000 .

[9]  P. Witherspoon,et al.  A Method of Analyzing Transient Fluid Flow in Multilayered Aquifers , 1969 .

[10]  Frederick L. Paillet,et al.  Determining the Distribution of Hydraulic Conductivity in a Fractured Limestone Aquifer by Simultaneous Injection and Geophysical Logging , 1988 .

[11]  Fred J. Molz,et al.  In-Well Hydraulics of the Electromagnetic Borehole Flowmeter , 1999 .

[12]  Numerical Evaluation of Flowmeter Test Interpretation Methodologies , 1996 .

[13]  Fred J. Molz,et al.  Evaluation of flowmeter-head loss effects in the flowmeter test , 1999 .

[14]  Z. J. Kabala.  Measuring distributions of hydraulic conductivity and specific storativity by the double flowmeter test , 1994 .

[15]  Z. Kabala,et al.  Numerical evaluation of the flowmeter test in a layered aquifer with a skin zone , 1997 .

[16]  Alfred E. Hess,et al.  Identifying hydraulically conductive fractures with a slow-velocity borehole flowmeter , 1986 .

[17]  S. Hutchins,et al.  Ground Water Sampling Bias Observed in Shallow, Conventional Wells , 2000 .

[18]  Michael A. Celia,et al.  Large-scale natural gradient tracer test in sand and gravel, Cape Cod, Massachusetts: 3. Hydraulic c , 1992 .