The hydrology of riparian buffer zones; two case studies in an ephemeral and a perennial stream

Abstract Riparian zones can provide a protective buffer between streams and adjacent land-based activities by removing nitrate from shallow groundwater flowing through them. Hydrological factors are an important influence on the effectiveness of riparian buffer zones in reducing pollutant loads delivered to streams. In this paper, we present results from a study of the hydrology of two riparian buffers belonging to an ephemeral and a perennial stream, which are part of a research project to study nitrogen transport and transformation processes in shallow groundwater in South-East Queensland, Australia. The investigation at the ephemeral site has shown that a shallow perched water table forms shortly after stream flow commences as a result of lateral flow from the stream to floodplain; it resides within the carbon-rich root zone and drains off after stream flow ceases. The low head gradient of 1% results in a low flow rate of about 6 cm/day along the floodplain, slow enough to allow effective removal of nitrate via denitrification to occur. The investigation at the perennial site has shown that water table dynamics within the floodplain are dissociated from the up-slope area except during over-bank flood events. During non-event conditions, there is low streamward gradient that results in a base flow component to the stream; the water table depth is about 3.5 m, hence missing most of the carbon-rich soils located close to the soil surface. During flood events, a reverse gradient towards the floodplain is formed; the streamward gradient is re-established after the flood wave passes. The water table fluctuates between 1.8 and 3.5 m under these conditions thus having a higher chance of interacting with more active floodplain sediments. Water stored in the floodplain has a residence time of 2–10 days, providing an opportunity for denitrification to reduce nitrate concentrations prior to water draining back to the stream.

[1]  Alan R. Hill,et al.  Nitrate dynamics in relation to lithology and hydrologic flow path in a river riparian zone. , 2000 .

[2]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Water table fluctuations within the floodplain of the River Severn, England , 2002 .

[3]  J. Newbold,et al.  Water Quality Functions of Riparian Forest Buffers in Chesapeake Bay Watersheds , 1997, Environmental management.

[4]  D. Correll,et al.  Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: Observations on the role of a riparian forest , 1984 .

[5]  K. Devito,et al.  Subsurface denitrification in a forest riparianzone: Interactions between hydrology and supplies ofnitrate and organic carbon , 2000 .

[6]  Arthur J. Gold,et al.  LANDSCAPE ATTRIBUTES AS CONTROLS ON GROITHD WATER NITRATE REMOVAL CAPACITY OF RIPARIAN ZONES 1 , 2001 .

[7]  Sébastien Lamontagne,et al.  Patterns in groundwater nitrogen concentration in the floodplain of a subtropical stream (Wollombi Brook, New South Wales) , 2005 .

[8]  Stan Boutin,et al.  Quantitative review of riparian buffer width guidelines from Canada and the United States. , 2004, Journal of environmental management.

[9]  J. Böhlke,et al.  Combined Use of Groundwater Dating, Chemical, and Isotopic Analyses to Resolve the History and Fate of Nitrate Contamination in Two Agricultural Watersheds, Atlantic Coastal Plain, Maryland , 1995 .

[10]  A. Butturini,et al.  Nitrogen Removal by Riparian Buffers along a European Climatic Gradient: Patterns and Factors of Variation , 2003, Ecosystems.

[11]  G. Pinay,et al.  Groundwater nitrate dynamics in grass and poplar vegetated riparian buffer strips during the winter , 1993 .

[12]  L. Puckett,et al.  Using chemical, hydrologic, and age dating analysis to delineate redox processes and flow paths in the riparian zone of a glacial outwash aquifer‐stream system , 2002 .

[13]  P. Vidon,et al.  Landscape controls on the hydrology of stream riparian zones , 2004 .

[14]  L. E. Asmussen,et al.  Nutrient Cycling in an Agricultural Watershed: I. Phreatic Movement , 1984 .

[15]  T. Burt,et al.  Denitrification in riparian buffer zones : the role of floodplain hydrology , 1999 .

[16]  M. Dosskey,et al.  Toward Quantifying Water Pollution Abatement in Response to Installing Buffers on Crop Land , 2001, Environmental management.

[17]  Malcolm G. Anderson,et al.  The role of topography in controlling throughflow generation , 1978 .

[18]  A. Butturini,et al.  Water table fluctuations in the riparian zone: comparative results from a pan-European experiment , 2002 .

[19]  P. Bolger,et al.  Contamination of Australian Groundwater Systems with Nitrate , 1999 .

[20]  Janet I. Sprent,et al.  The Ecology of the Nitrogen Cycle. , 1987 .

[21]  Alan R. Hill,et al.  Nitrate Removal in Stream Riparian Zones , 1996 .

[22]  A. Hill 3 – Stream Chemistry and Riparian Zones , 2000 .

[23]  P. Vidon,et al.  Denitrification potential in relation to lithology in five headwater riparian zones. , 2004, Journal of environmental quality.

[24]  A. Butturini,et al.  The influence of riparian-hyporheic zone on the hydrological responses in an intermittent stream , 2002 .

[25]  Patrick J. Mulholland,et al.  Streams and Ground Waters , 1999 .

[26]  David Rassam,et al.  Interaction of Surface Water and Groundwater and its Potential Effects on Denitrification in Riparian Buffers , 2003 .

[27]  S. Fisher,et al.  4 – Flood Frequency and Stream–Riparian Linkages in Arid Lands , 2000 .