How action selection influences the sense of agency: An ERP study

Abstract Sense of agency (SoA) refers to the feeling that we are in control of our actions and, through them, of events in the outside world. One influential view claims that the SoA depends on retrospectively matching the expected and actual outcomes of action. However, recent studies have revealed an additional, prospective component to SoA, driven by action selection processes. We used event‐related potentials (ERPs) to clarify the neural mechanisms underlying prospective agency. Subliminal priming was used to manipulate the fluency of selecting a left or right hand action in response to a supraliminal target. These actions were followed by one of several coloured circles, after a variable delay. Participants then rated their degree of control over this visual outcome. Incompatible priming impaired action selection, and reduced sense of agency over action outcomes, relative to compatible priming. More negative ERPs immediately after the action, linked to post‐decisional action monitoring, were associated with reduced agency ratings over action outcomes. Additionally, feedback‐related negativity evoked by the outcome was also associated with reduced agency ratings. These ERP components may reflect brain processes underlying prospective and retrospective components of sense of agency respectively. HighlightsDifficulty of action selection reduces the sense of agency over action outcomes.Neural signals at the time of the action contribute to judgements of agency.Neural processing of action outcomes also contributes to sense of agency.Sense of agency integrates action‐ and outcome‐related neural information.

[1]  R. Simons,et al.  Error-related psychophysiology and negative affect , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[2]  P. Haggard,et al.  What is the Human Sense of Agency, and is it Metacognitive? , 2014 .

[3]  David J. Turk,et al.  The angular gyrus computes action awareness representations. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  G. Pourtois,et al.  Erroneous and correct actions have a different affective valence: evidence from ERPs. , 2013, Emotion.

[5]  D. Heitjan,et al.  Mixed-effects models in psychophysiology. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[6]  Patrick Haggard,et al.  Priming of actions increases sense of control over unexpected outcomes , 2013, Consciousness and Cognition.

[7]  G. Hajcak,et al.  Impaired neural response to internal but not external feedback in schizophrenia , 2011, Psychological Medicine.

[8]  T. Endrass,et al.  Complementary modulation of N2 and CRN by conflict frequency. , 2014, Psychophysiology.

[9]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  The Validity of d′ Measures , 2012, PloS one.

[10]  Peter Balsam,et al.  Judgements of agency in schizophrenia: an impairment in autonoetic metacognition , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  G. Hajcak,et al.  Errors Are Aversive , 2008, Psychological science.

[12]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The neural basis of error detection: conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. , 2004, Psychological review.

[13]  Roel Bosker,et al.  Multilevel analysis : an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling , 1999 .

[14]  J. Marshall,et al.  The neural consequences of conflict between intention and the senses. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  Wilfried Kunde,et al.  Unconscious manipulation of free choice in humans , 2006, Consciousness and Cognition.

[16]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  The temporal dynamic of automatic inhibition of irrelevant actions. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  Midfrontal conflict-related theta-band power reflects neural oscillations that predict behavior. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  E. Wagenmakers A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  M. Hallett,et al.  The neural processes underlying self-agency. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[21]  Norbert Kathmann,et al.  Response accuracy rating modulates ERN and Pe amplitudes , 2014, Biological Psychology.

[22]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  ERP correlates of feedback and reward processing in the presence and absence of response choice. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  P. Haggard,et al.  Difficult action decisions reduce the sense of agency: A study using the Eriksen flanker task. , 2016, Acta psychologica.

[24]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Coercion Changes the Sense of Agency in the Human Brain , 2016, Current Biology.

[25]  Roni Tibon,et al.  Striking a balance: analyzing unbalanced event-related potential data , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[26]  R. Dolan,et al.  Parallel processing streams for motor output and sensory prediction during action preparation , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Masked prime stimuli can bias “free” choices between response alternatives , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Response inhibition in conflict tasks is revealed in delta plots , 2004 .

[29]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: Empirical clarification through distributional analyses. , 2002 .

[30]  Andrea Desantis,et al.  Mechanisms of intentional binding and sensory attenuation: the role of temporal prediction, temporal control, identity prediction, and motor prediction. , 2013, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  Peter Ullsperger,et al.  Dissociable medial frontal negativities from a common monitoring system for self- and externally caused failure of goal achievement , 2009, NeuroImage.

[32]  B. Kopp,et al.  N200 in the flanker task as a neurobehavioral tool for investigating executive control. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[33]  Simone Schütz-Bosbach,et al.  I Did It: Unconscious Expectation of Sensory Consequences Modulates the Experience of Self-agency and Its Functional Signature , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  Patrick A. O’Connor,et al.  Does subliminal priming of free response choices depend on task set or automatic response activation? , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.

[35]  Antao Chen,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of block-wise strategic adaptations to consciously and unconsciously triggered conflict , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  Theodore H. Poister,et al.  Performance monitoring , 1996 .

[37]  XIII—Epistemic Agency and Metacognition: An Externalist View , 2008 .

[38]  M. Brass,et al.  Whodunnit? Electrophysiological Correlates of Agency Judgements , 2011, PloS one.

[39]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  The Prefrontal Cortex Modulates Category Selectivity in Human Extrastriate Cortex , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[40]  Adrian R. Willoughby,et al.  The Medial Frontal Cortex and the Rapid Processing of Monetary Gains and Losses , 2002, Science.

[41]  Richard Ridderinkhof Micro- and macro-adjustments of task set: activation and suppression in conflict tasks , 2002, Psychological research.

[42]  Erich Schröger,et al.  The N1-suppression effect for self-initiated sounds is independent of attention , 2012, BMC Neuroscience.

[43]  Cheryl L. Dickter,et al.  Strategic control and medial frontal negativity: beyond errors and response conflict. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[44]  Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells,et al.  Violating body movement semantics: Neural signatures of self-generated and external-generated errors , 2016, NeuroImage.

[45]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[46]  E. Vogel,et al.  The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[47]  Michael Falkenstein,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility in Huntington's disease: a cognitive-neurophysiological analysis. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[48]  G. Dreisbach,et al.  Conflicts as aversive signals: Conflict priming increases negative judgments for neutral stimuli , 2013, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[49]  C. Frith,et al.  Experiencing Oneself vs Another Person as Being the Cause of an Action: The Neural Correlates of the Experience of Agency , 2002, NeuroImage.

[50]  Christopher Summerfield,et al.  Metacognition in human decision-making: confidence and error monitoring , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  Florian Waszak,et al.  ERP correlates of action effect prediction and visual sensory attenuation in voluntary action , 2011, NeuroImage.

[52]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  The feedback correct-related positivity: sensitivity of the event-related brain potential to unexpected positive feedback. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[53]  Jeffery G. Bednark,et al.  Agency attribution: event-related potentials and outcome monitoring , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.

[54]  Qiang Liu,et al.  The influence of the diffusion of responsibility effect on outcome evaluations: Electrophysiological evidence from an ERP study , 2010, NeuroImage.

[55]  B. Meier,et al.  Advances in Cognitive Psychology , 2022 .

[56]  R. E. Martin Event-related potential studies of outcome processing and feedback-guided learning , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[57]  Peter E. Clayson,et al.  Making sense of all the conflict: a theoretical review and critique of conflict-related ERPs. , 2014, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[58]  Marc Jeannerod,et al.  Modulating the experience of agency: a positron emission tomography study , 2003, NeuroImage.

[59]  Nick Yeung,et al.  Shared Neural Markers of Decision Confidence and Error Detection , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[60]  Adrian G. Fischer,et al.  Neural mechanisms and temporal dynamics of performance monitoring , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[61]  D. Wegner,et al.  Apparent mental causation. Sources of the experience of will. , 1999, The American psychologist.

[62]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Dissociating neural correlates for nouns and verbs , 2005, NeuroImage.

[63]  Janet Metcalfe,et al.  Dissociating Neural Correlates of Action Monitoring and Metacognition of Agency , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[64]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Affective and cognitive modulation of performance monitoring: Behavioral and ERP evidence , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[65]  Rico Fischer,et al.  If it’s hard to read… try harder! Processing fluency as signal for effort adjustments , 2011, Psychological research.

[66]  M. Gollwitzer,et al.  Advanced Multilevel Modeling for a Science of Groups: A Short Primer on Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling , 2017 .

[67]  Michael Inzlicht,et al.  Error-related negativity predicts academic performance. , 2010, Psychophysiology.

[68]  J. Schwarzbach,et al.  Different time courses for visual perception and action priming , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[69]  D. Bates,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4 , 2015 .

[70]  Patrick Haggard,et al.  Sense of control depends on fluency of action selection, not motor performance , 2012, Cognition.

[71]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[72]  Markus Ullsperger,et al.  Surprise and Error: Common Neuronal Architecture for the Processing of Errors and Novelty , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[73]  M. Brainin Cognition , 1999, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[74]  R. Mukamel,et al.  Perceived Loudness of Self-Generated Sounds Is Differentially Modified by Expected Sound Intensity , 2015, PloS one.

[75]  Michael J. Frank,et al.  Error-Related Negativity Predicts Reinforcement Learning and Conflict Biases , 2005, Neuron.

[76]  Dorothée Legrand Pre-reflective self-as-subject from experiential and empirical perspectives , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[77]  B. Burle,et al.  Distributional reaction time properties in the Eriksen task: marked differences or hidden similarities with the Simon task? , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[78]  J. D. de Fockert,et al.  Unconscious priming of a no-go response. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[79]  G. Dreisbach,et al.  Conflicts as aversive signals , 2012, Brain and Cognition.

[80]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[81]  P. Haggard,et al.  Voluntary action and conscious awareness , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[82]  P. Haggard,et al.  From action intentions to action effects: how does the sense of agency come about? , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[83]  Manos Tsakiris,et al.  The Experience of Agency , 2009 .

[84]  David Goodman,et al.  Performance Monitoring in the Anterior Cingulate is Not All Error Related: Expectancy Deviation and the Representation of Action-Outcome Associations , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[85]  R. Baker,et al.  When is an error not a prediction error? An electrophysiological investigation , 2009, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[86]  P. Haggard,et al.  Sense of agency , 2012, Current Biology.

[87]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Responsibility modulates neural mechanisms of outcome processing: an ERP study. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[88]  Baoxi Wang,et al.  Does conflict control occur without awareness? Evidence from an ERP study , 2013, Brain Research.

[89]  M. Voss,et al.  The experience of agency: an interplay between prediction and postdiction , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[90]  Norbert Kathmann,et al.  Response-related negativities following correct and incorrect responses: evidence from a temporospatial principal component analysis. , 2012, Psychophysiology.

[91]  S. Schütz-Bosbach,et al.  Reliability of sensory predictions determines the experience of self-agency , 2012, Behavioural Brain Research.

[92]  P. Haggard,et al.  TMS stimulation over the inferior parietal cortex disrupts prospective sense of agency , 2014, Brain Structure and Function.

[93]  P. Haggard,et al.  Subliminal priming of actions influences sense of control over effects of action , 2010, Cognition.

[94]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Abnormalities in the awareness of action , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[95]  C. Carter,et al.  The Timing of Action-Monitoring Processes in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[96]  W. Prinz,et al.  An online neural substrate for sense of agency. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[97]  Kobe Desender,et al.  Feeling the Conflict , 2014, Psychological science.

[98]  K. Vogeley,et al.  The “sense of agency” and its underlying cognitive and neural mechanisms , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[99]  Marco Steinhauser,et al.  Performance monitoring and the causal attribution of errors , 2011, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[100]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Evidence for sensory prediction deficits in schizophrenia. , 2005, The American journal of psychiatry.

[101]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Subliminal action priming modulates the perceived intensity of sensory action consequences , 2014, Cognition.

[102]  Geert J. M. van Boxtel,et al.  The N2 in go/no-go tasks reflects conflict monitoring not response inhibition , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[103]  M. Coles,et al.  Performance monitoring in a confusing world: error-related brain activity, judgments of response accuracy, and types of errors. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[104]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[105]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[106]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[107]  E. Pacherie The phenomenology of action: A conceptual framework , 2008, Cognition.

[108]  P. Haggard,et al.  Altered awareness of action in schizophrenia: a specific deficit in predicting action consequences. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[109]  Jonathan R. Folstein,et al.  Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[110]  G. Andrew,et al.  arm: Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2014 .

[111]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Motivation of extended behaviors by anterior cingulate cortex , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[112]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. , 2002, Psychological review.

[113]  D. Wegner,et al.  Apparent mental causation , 1999 .

[114]  M. Botvinick Conflict monitoring and decision making: Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function , 2007, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[115]  E. G. Jones Cerebral Cortex , 1987, Cerebral Cortex.

[116]  S. Nieuwenhuis,et al.  Dissociating Response Conflict and Error Likelihood in Anterior Cingulate Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[117]  Sidney J. Segalowitz,et al.  The effects of uncertainty in error monitoring on associated ERPs , 2004, Brain and Cognition.