A comparison of sap flux density using thermal dissipation, heat pulse velocity and heat field deformation methods

Abstract A laboratory test and field evaluation were conducted to determine the accuracy of the three commonly used techniques for measuring sap flux density in trees: heat pulse velocity, thermal dissipation and heat field deformation. In the laboratory test a constant flow rate of water was maintained through freshly cut stem segments of diffuse-porous Fagus grandifolia trees with mean sapwood depths of 4.02 ± 0.14 and 7.44 ± 0.51 cm for sample trees with stem diameter at breast height of 15 and 21 cm, respectively. The three sensor types were measured simultaneously and compared against gravimetric measurements. All three techniques substantially underestimated sap flux density. On average the actual sap flux density was underestimated by 35% using heat pulse velocity (with wound correction), 46% using heat field deformation and 60% using thermal dissipation. These results were consistent across sap flux densities ranging from 5 to 80 cm3 cm−2 h−1. Heat pulse velocity measurements were more variable than those of the other two techniques, and the least accurate at low sap flux densities. An error analysis was conducted on all parameters of the equations used with each technique. That analysis indicated that each technique has unique sensitivities to errors in parameter estimates which need to be taken into consideration. Except for the use of heat, the three techniques are quite different and there appeared to be no single reason why the methods underestimated actual sap flux density, but rather there were likely multiple errors that compounded to reduce the overall accuracy of each technique. Field measurements supported the relative sensor performance observed in the laboratory. Applying a sensor-specific correction factor based on the laboratory test to the field data produced similar estimates of sap flux density from all three techniques. We conclude that a species-specific calibration is necessary when using any of these techniques to insure that accurate estimates of sap flux density are obtained, at least until a physical basis for an error correction can be proposed.

[1]  E. McCarthy.  MARIOTTE'S BOTTLE. , 1934, Science.

[2]  R. Mitchell,et al.  Diurnal and seasonal variability in the radial distribution of sap flow: predicting total stem flow in Pinus taeda trees. , 2004, Tree physiology.

[3]  B. A. Trevino,et al.  Stem flow and porometer measurements of transpiration from honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) , 1994 .

[4]  R. Oren,et al.  Radial patterns of xylem sap flow in non‐, diffuse‐ and ring‐porous tree species , 1996 .

[5]  A. Granier.  Une nouvelle méthode pour la mesure du flux de sève brute dans le tronc des arbres , 1985 .

[6]  R. H. Swanson,et al.  A Numerical Analysis of Heat Pulse Velocity Theory and Practice , 1981 .

[7]  Brent Clothier,et al.  Water Use of Kiwifruit Vines and Apple Trees by the Heat-Pulse Technique , 1988 .

[8]  A. Granier,et al.  Evaluation of transpiration in a Douglas-fir stand by means of sap flow measurements. , 1987, Tree physiology.

[9]  P. Dye,et al.  Evaluation of the heat pulse velocity method for measuring sap flow in Pinus patula , 1996 .

[10]  M. Adams,et al.  A validation, comparison and error analysis of two heat-pulse methods for measuring sap flow in Eucalyptus marginata saplings. , 2004, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[11]  H. Lambers,et al.  Partitioning of evapotranspiration in a semi-arid eucalypt woodland in south-western Australia , 2009 .

[12]  M. Adams,et al.  An improved heat pulse method to measure low and reverse rates of sap flow in woody plants. , 2001, Tree physiology.

[13]  N. Phillips,et al.  Transient response of sap flow to wind speed , 2008, Journal of experimental botany.

[14]  S. Allen,et al.  Measurement of sap flow in plant stems , 1996 .

[15]  P. Becker,et al.  Limitations of a compensation heat pulse velocity system at low sap flow: implications for measurements at night and in shaded trees. , 1998, Tree physiology.

[16]  J. Cermak,et al.  A unified nomenclature for sap flow measurements. , 1997, Tree physiology.

[17]  A. Cescatti,et al.  Diurnal and seasonal variability in radial distribution of sap flux density: Implications for estimating stand transpiration. , 2006, Tree physiology.

[18]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Radial patterns of sap flow in woody stems of dominant and understory species: scaling errors associated with positioning of sensors. , 2002, Tree physiology.

[19]  R. Mitchell,et al.  Assessing variation in the radial profile of sap flux density in Pinus species and its effect on daily water use. , 2004, Tree physiology.

[20]  W. R. N. Edwards,et al.  Transpiration from a kiwifruit vine as estimated by the heat pulse technique and the Penman-Monteith equation , 1984 .

[21]  Frederick C. Meinzer,et al.  Potential errors in measurement of nonuniform sap flow using heat dissipation probes. , 1999, Tree physiology.

[22]  U. Schurr.  Xylem sap sampling—new approaches to an old topic , 1998 .

[23]  R. Lemeur,et al.  Spatial variability of xylem sap flow in mature beech (Fagus sylvatica) and its diurnal dynamics in relation to microclimate , 2008 .

[24]  F. Do,et al.  Influence of natural temperature gradients on measurements of xylem sap flow with thermal dissipation probes. 1. Field observations and possible remedies. , 2002, Tree physiology.

[25]  R. Swanson.  Significant historical developments in thermal methods for measuring sap flow in trees , 1994 .

[26]  A. Ritter,et al.  An alternative method to estimate zero flow temperature differences for Granier's thermal dissipation technique. , 2007, Tree physiology.

[27]  R. Mitchell,et al.  Water table depth affects productivity, water use, and the response to nitrogen addition in a savanna system , 2008 .

[28]  J. Cermak,et al.  Vertical and horizontal water redistribution in Norway spruce (Picea abies) roots in the Moravian Upland. , 2006, Tree physiology.

[29]  D. Marshall.  Measurement of Sap Flow in Conifers by Heat Transport. , 1958, Plant physiology.