The new IASLC-ATS-ERS lung adenocarcinoma classification: what the surgeon should know.

In 2011, a new histologic classification of lung adenocarcinomas was proposed from a joint working group of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, American Thoracic Society, and European Respiratory Society, based on the recommendation of an international and multidisciplinary panel. This classification proposed a method of comprehensive histologic subtyping (lepidic, acinar, papillary, micropapillary, and solid pattern) based on semiquantitative assessment of histologic patterns (in 5% increments), with the ultimate goal of choosing a single, predominant pattern. Prognostic subsets could then be described for the classification. Patients with completely resected adenocarcinoma in situ and minimally invasive adenocarcinomas experienced low risk of recurrence. Patients with micropapillary or solid predominant tumors have a high risk of recurrence or cancer-related death. Patients with acinar and papillary predominant tumors comprise an intermediate-risk group. Herein, we review the outline of the proposed International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, American Thoracic Society, and European Respiratory Society classification, a summary of published validation studies of this new classification, and then discuss the key surgical issues; we mainly focused on limited resection as an adequate treatment for early-stage lung adenocarcinomas, as well as preoperative and intraoperative diagnoses. We also review the published studies that identified the importance of histologic subtypes in predicting recurrence, both rates and patterns, in early-stage lung adenocarcinomas. This new classification for the most common type of lung cancer is useful for surgeons, as its implementation would require only hematoxylin-and-eosin histology slides, which is the common type of stain used in hospitals. It can be implemented with routine pathology evaluation and with no additional costs.

[1]  C. Sima,et al.  Using frozen section to identify histological patterns in stage I lung adenocarcinoma of ≤3 cm: accuracy and interobserver agreement , 2015, Histopathology.

[2]  P. Laurent-Puig,et al.  The new histologic classification of lung primary adenocarcinoma subtypes is a reliable prognostic marker and identifies tumors with different mutation status: the experience of a French cohort. , 2014, Chest.

[3]  J. Luketich,et al.  Recurrence and survival outcomes after anatomic segmentectomy versus lobectomy for clinical stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  Prasad S Adusumilli,et al.  Associations Between Mutations and Histologic Patterns of Mucin in Lung Adenocarcinoma: Invasive Mucinous Pattern and Extracellular Mucin Are Associated With KRAS Mutation , 2014, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[5]  Y. Takeshima,et al.  Prediction for prognosis of resected pT1a-1bN0M0 adenocarcinoma based on tumor size and histological status: relationship of TNM and IASLC/ATS/ERS classifications. , 2014, Lung cancer.

[6]  S. Shiono,et al.  The correlation of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC)/American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) classification with prognosis and EGFR mutation in lung adenocarcinoma. , 2014, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[7]  T. Chou,et al.  Predictive value of the international association for the study of lung cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society classification of lung adenocarcinoma in tumor recurrence and patient survival. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  Jun Zhao,et al.  Correlation of survival and EGFR mutation with predominant histologic subtype according to the new lung adenocarcinoma classification in stage IB patients , 2014, World Journal of Surgical Oncology.

[9]  Morihito Okada,et al.  Sublobar resection for lung adenocarcinoma meeting node-negative criteria on preoperative imaging. , 2014, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[10]  Prasad S Adusumilli,et al.  The cribriform pattern identifies a subset of acinar predominant tumors with poor prognosis in patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma: a conceptual proposal to classify cribriform predominant tumors as a distinct histologic subtype , 2014, Modern Pathology.

[11]  Akihiko Yoshizawa,et al.  Prognostic Significance of Adenocarcinoma In Situ, Minimally Invasive Adenocarcinoma, and Nonmucinous Lepidic Predominant Invasive Adenocarcinoma of the Lung in Patients With Stage I Disease , 2014, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[12]  Ho Yun Lee,et al.  Micropapillary and solid subtypes of invasive lung adenocarcinoma: clinical predictors of histopathology and outcome. , 2014, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[13]  P. Cagle,et al.  Correlation of EGFR mutation status with predominant histologic subtype of adenocarcinoma according to the new lung adenocarcinoma classification of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society. , 2014, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[14]  I. Petersen,et al.  CD74-NRG1 fusions in lung adenocarcinoma. , 2014, Cancer discovery.

[15]  T. Chou,et al.  Prognostic Value of the New International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Lung Adenocarcinoma Classification on Death and Recurrence in Completely Resected Stage I Lung Adenocarcinoma , 2013, Annals of surgery.

[16]  Z Guo,et al.  Prognostic value of the IASLC/ATS/ERS classification in stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients--based on a hospital study in China. , 2013, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[17]  S. Monaco,et al.  Cytologic subtyping of lung adenocarcinoma by using the proposed International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (IASLC/ATS/ERS) adenocarcinoma classification , 2013, Cancer Cytopathology.

[18]  G. Ferretti,et al.  Adequacy of CT-guided biopsies with histomolecular subtyping of pulmonary adenocarcinomas: influence of ATS/ERS/IASLC guidelines. , 2013, Lung cancer.

[19]  C. Toon,et al.  The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society grading system has limited prognostic significance in advanced resected pulmonary adenocarcinoma , 2013, Pathology.

[20]  Q. Tan,et al.  Why Do Pathological Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinomas Vary from Prognosis?: A Clinicopathologic Study of 176 Patients with Pathological Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma Based on the IASLC/ATS/ERS Classification , 2013, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[21]  H. Asamura,et al.  The utility of the proposed IASLC/ATS/ERS lung adenocarcinoma subtypes for disease prognosis and correlation of driver gene alterations. , 2013, Lung cancer.

[22]  Prasad S Adusumilli,et al.  Impact of micropapillary histologic subtype in selecting limited resection vs lobectomy for lung adenocarcinoma of 2cm or smaller. , 2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[23]  C. Sima,et al.  Preoperative Consolidation-to-Tumor Ratio and SUVmax Stratify the Risk of Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Limited Resection for Lung Adenocarcinoma ≤2 cm , 2013, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[24]  A. Yoshizawa,et al.  Pulmonary adenocarcinomas with micropapillary component significantly correlate with recurrence, but can be well controlled with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the early stages. , 2013, Lung cancer.

[25]  Wei Wu,et al.  Correlation of EGFR mutation and predominant histologic subtype according to the new lung adenocarcinoma classification in Chinese patients , 2013, Medical Oncology.

[26]  Yang Zhang,et al.  Predictive Factors of Lymph Node Status in Small Peripheral Non-small Cell Lung Cancers: Tumor Histology is More Reliable , 2013, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[27]  Shin-ya Ogata,et al.  New IASLC/ATS/ERS Classification and Invasive Tumor Size are Predictive of Disease Recurrence in Stage I Lung Adenocarcinoma , 2013, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[28]  Jie Gu,et al.  Prognostic significance of the IASLC/ATS/ERS classification in Chinese patients—A single institution retrospective study of 292 lung adenocarcinoma , 2012, Journal of surgical oncology.

[29]  M. Ladanyi,et al.  KRAS mutations are associated with solid growth pattern and tumor-infiltrating leukocytes in lung adenocarcinoma , 2013, Modern Pathology.

[30]  C. Sima,et al.  Thyroid transcription factor‐1 expression is an independent predictor of recurrence and correlates with the IASLC/ATS/ERS histologic classification in patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma , 2013, Cancer.

[31]  C. Sima,et al.  Clinical impact of immune microenvironment in stage I lung adenocarcinoma: tumor interleukin-12 receptor β2 (IL-12Rβ2), IL-7R, and stromal FoxP3/CD3 ratio are independent predictors of recurrence. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  A. Yoshizawa,et al.  Validation of the IASLC/ATS/ERS Lung Adenocarcinoma Classification for Prognosis and Association with EGFR and KRAS Gene Mutations: Analysis of 440 Japanese Patients , 2013, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[33]  Hideaki Mitsui,et al.  Prognostic value of the IASLC/ATS/ERS classification of lung adenocarcinoma in stage I disease of Japanese cases , 2012, Pathology international.

[34]  Iver Petersen,et al.  Reproducibility of histopathological subtypes and invasion in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. An international interobserver study , 2012, Modern Pathology.

[35]  T. Chou,et al.  Stromal invasion and micropapillary pattern in 212 consecutive surgically resected stage I lung adenocarcinomas: histopathological categories for prognosis prediction , 2012, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[36]  Michael Thomas,et al.  The novel histologic International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society classification system of lung adenocarcinoma is a stage-independent predictor of survival. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[37]  Prasad S Adusumilli,et al.  A grading system combining architectural features and mitotic count predicts recurrence in stage I lung adenocarcinoma , 2012, Modern Pathology.

[38]  Y. Shimada,et al.  Predictive factors of pathologically proven noninvasive tumor characteristics in T1aN0M0 peripheral non-small cell lung cancer. , 2012, Chest.

[39]  W. Pao,et al.  Frequency of Driver Mutations in Lung Adenocarcinoma from Female Never-Smokers Varies with Histologic Subtypes and Age at Diagnosis , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[40]  Zoe Wainer,et al.  Does Lung Adenocarcinoma Subtype Predict Patient Survival?: A Clinicopathologic Study Based on the New International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International Multidisciplinary Lung Adenocarcinoma Classification , 2011, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[41]  Akihiko Yoshizawa,et al.  Impact of proposed IASLC/ATS/ERS classification of lung adenocarcinoma: prognostic subgroups and implications for further revision of staging based on analysis of 514 stage I cases , 2011, Modern Pathology.

[42]  Kenji Suzuki,et al.  A Prospective Radiological Study of Thin-Section Computed Tomography to Predict Pathological Noninvasiveness in Peripheral Clinical IA Lung Cancer (Japan Clinical Oncology Group 0201) , 2011, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[43]  W. Travis,et al.  Suitability of Thoracic Cytology for New Therapeutic Paradigms in Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma: High Accuracy of Tumor Subtyping and Feasibility of EGFR and KRAS Molecular Testing , 2011, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[44]  Masahiro Tsuboi,et al.  International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International Multidisciplinary Classification of Lung Adenocarcinoma , 2011, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[45]  H. Pass,et al.  Sublobar Resection: A Movement from the Lung Cancer Study Group , 2010, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[46]  Akihiko Yoshizawa,et al.  A Grading System of Lung Adenocarcinomas Based on Histologic Pattern is Predictive of Disease Recurrence in Stage I Tumors , 2010, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[47]  M. Noguchi,et al.  Possible Delayed Cut-End Recurrence After Limited Resection for Ground-Glass Opacity Adenocarcinoma, Intraoperatively Diagnosed as Noguchi Type B, in Three Patients , 2010, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[48]  Y. Nishiwaki,et al.  Structural and biological properties of a papillary component generating a micropapillary component in lung adenocarcinoma. , 2010, Lung cancer.

[49]  C. Compton,et al.  The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM , 2010, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[50]  H. Horinouchi,et al.  Histopathological features and prognostic significance of the micropapillary pattern in lung adenocarcinoma , 2008, Modern Pathology.

[51]  N. Moreno,et al.  Micropapillary lung adenocarcinoma: a distinctive histologic subtype with prognostic significance. Case series. , 2008, Human pathology.

[52]  H. Iwasaki,et al.  Micropapillary pattern: a distinct pathological marker to subclassify tumours with a significantly poor prognosis within small peripheral lung adenocarcinoma (≤20 mm) with mixed bronchioloalveolar and invasive subtypes (Noguchi's type C tumours) , 2005, Histopathology.

[53]  H. Ohmatsu,et al.  Limited resection trial for pulmonary ground-glass opacity nodules: fifty-case experience. , 2005, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[54]  Y. Ishikawa,et al.  Early-Stage Lung Adenocarcinomas With a Micropapillary Pattern, a Distinct Pathologic Marker for a Significantly Poor Prognosis , 2003, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[55]  Y. Nishiwaki,et al.  Favorable and unfavorable morphological prognostic factors in peripheral adenocarcinoma of the lung 3 cm or less in diameter. , 2000, Lung cancer.

[56]  H. Urer,et al.  Relationship between lung adenocarcinoma histological subtype and patient prognosis. , 2014, Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia.

[57]  Takashi Hirai,et al.  Tumor invasiveness as defined by the newly proposed IASLC/ATS/ERS classification has prognostic significance for pathologic stage IA lung adenocarcinoma and can be predicted by radiologic parameters. , 2014, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.