Efficacy and sensitivity of axial scans and different reconstruction methods in the study of the ulcerated carotid plaque using multidetector-row CT angiography: comparison with surgical results.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Carotid plaque ulceration is an important risk factor for stroke, and its diagnosis may be very important to plan a correct therapeutic approach. We hypothesized that axial scans and various reconstruction methods could have different specificity and sensitivity in the study of plaque ulceration. The object of this study was to evaluate their role and diagnostic efficacy in patients with carotid plaque complicated by ulceration through the comparison with surgical results. MATERIALS AND METHODS From January 2004 to November 2005, 109 patients who underwent a carotid endarterectomy were analyzed using CT angiography for a total of 218 carotid arteries. We assessed every carotid for the presence of ulcerations. For each patient axial image, maximum intensity projection (MIP), multiplanar reconstruction (MPR), shaded surface display (SSD), and volume rendering (VR) reconstructions were obtained. RESULTS Multidetector row CT angiography (MDCT) found 32 ulcerations; surgical confirmation underlined an overall 93.9% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.858-1.021), and a 98.7% specificity (95% CI, 0.961-1.012). Axial scans and volume rendering images demonstrated the highest sensitivity (90.9% and 87.9%, respectively); SSD, on the contrary, showed the lowest sensitivity: 39.4% (95% CI sensitivity, 0.227-0.561). CONCLUSION Axial scans plus VR reconstruction techniques offer superior depiction of carotid plaque ulceration compared with MIP, MPR, and SSD.

[1]  Akihiro Sato,et al.  Quantitative vascular measurements in arterial occlusive disease. , 2005, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[2]  B S Kuszyk,et al.  CT angiography with volume rendering: advantages and applications in splanchnic vascular imaging. , 1996, Radiology.

[3]  S. Adelman.  The National Survey of Stroke. Economic impact. , 1981, Stroke.

[4]  C Marsault,et al.  Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography. , 2001, Radiology.

[5]  D. Seo,et al.  The Relationship Between the Angiographic Findings and the Clinical Features of Carotid Artery Plaque , 2000, Surgery Today.

[6]  P. Rothwell,et al.  Histological Correlates of Carotid Plaque Surface Morphology on Lumen Contrast Imaging , 2004, Circulation.

[7]  J. Brossmann,et al.  Spiral CT angiography and selective digital subtraction angiography of internal carotid artery stenosis. , 1996, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[8]  P. Rothwell,et al.  Reproducibility of Histological Assessment of Carotid Plaque: Implications for Studies of Carotid Imaging , 2004, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[9]  K D Hopper,et al.  CT angiography: in vitro comparison of five reconstruction methods. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  E. Ballotta,et al.  Carotid plaque gross morphology and clinical presentation: a prospective study of 457 carotid artery specimens. , 2000, The Journal of surgical research.

[11]  F. D. Weinfeld,et al.  National survey of stroke. , 1979, Transactions of the American Neurological Association.

[12]  A. Davies,et al.  Relationship between the regional and national incidence of transient ischaemic attack and stroke and performance of carotid endarterectomy. , 1998, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[13]  A. Gallino,et al.  Usefulness of multiplanar reconstructions in evaluation of carotid CT angiography. , 2003, Radiology.

[14]  David Vo,et al.  Improved Imaging of Carotid Artery Bifurcation Using Helical Computed Tomographic Angiography , 1999, Annals of vascular surgery.

[15]  R. Herzig,et al.  Comparison of ultrasonography, CT angiography, and digital subtraction angiography in severe carotid stenoses , 2004, European journal of neurology.

[16]  M. Cumming,et al.  Carotid artery stenosis: a prospective comparison of CT angiography and conventional angiography. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  G D Rubin,et al.  STS-MIP: a new reconstruction technique for CT of the chest. , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[18]  W. Pearce,et al.  Carotid plaque morphology correlates with presenting symptomatology. , 1998, Journal of vascular surgery.

[19]  A. Gallino,et al.  Spiral computed tomography: a novel diagnostic approach for investigation of the extracranial cerebral arteries and its complementary role in duplex ultrasonography. , 1998, Circulation.

[20]  C Georg,et al.  Noninvasive detection and evaluation of atherosclerotic coronary plaques with multislice computed tomography. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  V. Ladam-Marcus,et al.  Carotid arterial stenosis: evaluation at CT angiography with the volume-rendering technique. , 1999, Radiology.

[22]  R Kikinis,et al.  Common carotid artery bifurcation: evaluation with spiral CT. Work in progress. , 1992, Radiology.

[23]  Dwayne Phillips,et al.  Image processing in C , 1994 .

[24]  Thomas G. Whiston,et al.  A National Survey , 1992 .

[25]  L. Paquet.  [Economic impact]. , 2004, SADJ : journal of the South African Dental Association = tydskrif van die Suid-Afrikaanse Tandheelkundige Vereniging.

[26]  M. Prokop,et al.  Use of maximum intensity projections in CT angiography: a basic review. , 1997, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[27]  V. Hachinski,et al.  Angiographic Detection of Carotid Plaque Ulceration: Comparison With Surgical Observations in a Multicenter Study , 1994, Stroke.

[28]  V M Runge,et al.  Contrast‐enhanced MR angiography , 1993, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[29]  Dianna D Cody,et al.  AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: topics in CT. Image processing in CT. , 2002, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[30]  Michael F McNitt-Gray,et al.  AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in CT. Radiation dose in CT. , 2002, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[31]  H M Baum,et al.  The National Survey of Stroke. Incidence. , 1981, Stroke.

[32]  D. Sackett,et al.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  D. Birchall,et al.  Computed Tomography Angiography for the Evaluation of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque: Correlation With Histopathology of Endarterectomy Specimens , 2002, Stroke.

[34]  X Leclerc,et al.  Internal carotid arterial stenosis: CT angiography with volume rendering. , 1999, Radiology.

[35]  K. Bolz.  [Complications of angiography]. , 1988, Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke.

[36]  J. Wardlaw,et al.  Atherosclerotic plaque at the carotid bifurcation: CT angiographic appearance with histopathologic correlation. , 1999, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.