Modelling of an alternative process technology for biofuel production and assessment of its environmental impacts

It is easy to predict that in the coming years in Europe biodiesel will play an increasingly important role in the transport sector. The European Commission has set at 10% by 2020 the proportion that biofuels should represent in total fuel used in transport and biodiesel is currently the most widely used biofuel in the European Union. The most common way to produce biodiesel is through transesterification of vegetable oils with methanol; glycerol is the main co-product. Although glycerol has many industrial applications, increased production of biodiesel could make complete market placement of this chemical difficult. In this context, increasing interest is paid towards different methods of biodiesel production that provide alternative co-products. This article offers a “cradle to gate” evaluation of potential environmental impacts caused by an innovative process for the production of DMC-BioD, an alternative biofuel to biodiesel which does not involve the production of glycerol. Transesterification of soybean oil with dimethyl carbonate to obtain DMC-BioD has been modelled with the aid of the Chemical Process Simulation software Aspen HYSYS® that produced the material and energy balances and the preliminary sizing of the process units. Results have been also compared with background information from database on the production of conventional biodiesel from soybean oil and of fossil diesel. The study suggests that DMC-BioD can be an interesting route for the production of biofuels from an environmental point of view. Compared to fossil diesel, GHG (Greenhouse gases) emissions can be decreased, although trade-offs are registered in other environmental categories. In any case, future investigation is needed in order to understand and optimize its environmental profile through the entire life cycle and possibly bring its production to a commercial scale. This preliminary analysis of potential environmental impacts provides useful information to continue the testing and scale-up phases and to improve the environmental performances of the process.

[1]  Hans-Jörg Althaus,et al.  The ecoinvent Database: Overview and Methodological Framework (7 pp) , 2005 .

[2]  Michele Aresta,et al.  Life cycle analysis applied to the assessment of the environmental impact of alternative synthetic processes. The dimethylcarbonate case: part 1 , 1999 .

[3]  R. P. Badoni,et al.  Jatropha and Karanja oil derived DMC–biodiesel synthesis: A kinetics study , 2015 .

[4]  Ho-mu Lin,et al.  Kinetics studies for the synthesis of dimethyl carbonate from urea and methanol , 2004 .

[5]  Daniele Fabbri,et al.  Properties of a potential biofuel obtained from soybean oil by transmethylation with dimethyl carbonate , 2007 .

[6]  Pål Börjesson,et al.  Agricultural crop-based biofuels – resource efficiency and environmental performance including direct land use changes , 2011 .

[7]  Alessandro Tugnoli,et al.  Comparative cradle-to-gate life cycle assessments of cellulose dissolution with 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride and N-methyl-morpholine-N-oxide , 2011 .

[8]  M. Arai,et al.  Synthesis of dimethyl carbonate from carbon dioxide and methanol in the presence of methyl iodide and base catalysts under mild conditions: effect of reaction conditions and reaction mechanism , 2001 .

[9]  Matthias Schulz,et al.  Evolution of disposable baby diapers in Europe: life cycle assessment of environmental impacts and identification of key areas of improvement , 2015 .

[10]  M. Dubé,et al.  Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: 1. Process design and technological assessment. , 2003, Bioresource technology.

[11]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  LCA of second generation bioethanol: A review and some issues to be resolved for good LCA practice , 2012 .

[12]  Tao Wang,et al.  One-pot synthesis of dimethyl carbonate using ethylene oxide, methanol, and carbon dioxide under supercritical conditions , 2003 .

[13]  F. Santarelli,et al.  A Set of Coherent Indicators for the Assessment of the Energy Profitability of Energy Systems , 2013 .

[14]  Mateus F. Chagas,et al.  Life cycle assessment of butanol production in sugarcane biorefineries in Brazil , 2015 .

[15]  M. Chauvet,et al.  Biocombustibles y cultivosbiofarmacéuticos:¿oportunidades o amenazas? , 2008 .

[16]  Xiujuan Feng,et al.  Tertiary amino group covalently bonded to MCM-41 silica as heterogeneous catalyst for the continuous synthesis of dimethyl carbonate from methanol and ethylene carbonate , 2004 .

[17]  T. Darmanin,et al.  Glycerol carbonate as a versatile building block for tomorrow: synthesis, reactivity, properties and applications , 2013 .

[18]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  A New LCA Methodology of Technology Evolution (TE-LCA) and its Application to the Production of Ammonia (1950-2000) (8 pp) , 2006 .

[19]  S. Ulgiati,et al.  Life cycle assessment of Brassica carinata biomass conversion to bioenergy and platform chemicals , 2014 .

[20]  M. Arai,et al.  Transesterification of urea and ethylene glycol to ethylene carbonate as an important step for urea based dimethyl carbonate synthesis , 2003 .

[21]  Prasant Kumar Rout,et al.  Production of first and second generation biofuels: A comprehensive review , 2010 .

[22]  K. Fujimoto,et al.  Direct synthesis of dimethyl carbonate from carbon dioxide and methanol catalyzed by base , 1996 .

[23]  Yuhan Sun,et al.  Synthesis of dimethyl carbonate from urea and methanol over solid base catalysts , 2006 .

[24]  J. Huber,et al.  Technological Environmental Innovations (TEIs) in a chain-analytical and life-cycle-analytical perspective , 2008 .

[25]  Jin-Suk Lee,et al.  Biodiesel production by heterogeneous catalysts and supercritical technologies. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[26]  U. Romano,et al.  Synthesis of Dimethyl Carbonate from Methanol, Carbon Monoxide, and Oxygen Catalyzed by Copper Compounds , 1980 .

[27]  T. Buchholz,et al.  Sustainability criteria for bioenergy systems: results from an expert survey , 2009 .

[28]  Kasturi Dutta,et al.  Evolution retrospective for alternative fuels: First to fourth generation , 2014 .

[29]  M. Aresta,et al.  Influence of Al2O3 on the performance of CeO2 used as catalyst in the direct carboxylation of methanol to dimethylcarbonate and the elucidation of the reaction mechanism , 2010 .

[30]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Establishing Life Cycle Inventories of Chemicals Based on Differing Data Availability (9 pp) , 2005 .

[31]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  Production of fine and speciality chemicals: procedure for the estimation of LCIs , 2004 .

[32]  D. Oliveira,et al.  An Overview of Enzyme-Catalyzed Reactions and Alternative Feedstock for Biodiesel Production , 2011 .

[33]  Diego Luna,et al.  An overview on glycerol-free processes for the production of renewable liquid biofuels, applicable in diesel engines , 2015 .

[34]  Marko Zlokarnik,et al.  Scale-Up in Chemical Engineering: Second, Completely Revised and Extended Edition , 2002 .