Energetics, Productivity and Profitability of Soybean (Glycine max)-Based Intercropping Systems under Different Planting Patterns

Background: Intercropping is an effective tool to enhance productivity, biodiversity and stability of the fragile agro-ecosystem. In the era of shrinking resources, intercropping based on pulse crops like soybean can play an important role in crop diversification as well as agricultural sustainability. But, the information on soybean based intercropping systems is limited and needs to be explored for north-west India. Methods: A field experiment was conducted during kharif seasons of 2015 and 2016 to evaluate the effect of different soybean based intercropping systems under different planting patterns on productivity, profitability and energetics. Soybean crop was planted as sole as well as in intercropping systems viz., soybean (45 cm) + mung bean (1:1), soybean (45 cm) + cowpea fodder (1:1), soybean (45 cm) + groundnut (1:1), soybean (45 cm) + maize fodder (1:1) , soybean (60 cm) + mash (1:1), soybean (60 cm) + mung bean (1:2), soybean (60 cm) + cowpea fodder (1:2), soybean (60 cm) + groundnut (1:2), soybean (60 cm) + maize fodder (1:2) and soybean (60 cm) + maize (grain) (1:1). Result: The pooled results over two years elucidated that soybean equivalent yield was affected significantly by different intercropping systems. Soybean (45 cm) + groundnut (1:1) produced the highest soybean equivalent yield and it was significantly better than all other systems except soybean (60 cm) + groundnut in 1:2 row ratio. Similar trend was followed by production efficiency. Both, soybean (45 cm) + groundnut (1:1) and soybean (60cm) + groundnut (1:2) systems produced significantly higher energy productivity as compared to sole soybean. The highest gross (Rs. 98185 /ha) and net returns (Rs. 56122/ha) were obtained in soybean (45 cm) + groundnut (1:1) intercropping system whereas the highest benefit cost ratio was obtained in soybean (60 cm) + maize fodder (1:2) system.

[1]  S. Maitra Potential of Intercropping System in Sustaining Crop Productivity , 2019, International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Biotechnology.

[2]  D. Singh,et al.  Effect of sowing dates, mulching and seed rates on nutrient uptake and productivity of soybean in sub - humid Punjab, India , 2018 .

[3]  K. S. Saini,et al.  Production potential and economic returns of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) based intercropping system as influenced by planting pattern and nutrients levels , 2018 .

[4]  Rakesh Kumar,et al.  Productivity and profitability of legume-cereal forages under different planting ratio and nitrogen fertilization , 2018 .

[5]  L. Omoigui,et al.  MAIZE–SOYBEAN INTERCROPPING FOR SUSTAINABLE INTENSIFICATION OF CEREAL–LEGUME CROPPING SYSTEMS IN NORTHERN NIGERIA , 2017, Experimental Agriculture.

[6]  Akshay K. Singh,et al.  Impact of legume intensified crop rotations and tillage practices on maize productivity vis-à-vis C and N dynamics of a sandy loam soil in north-western Indo-Gangetic Plains of India , 2017 .

[7]  F. Celette,et al.  Intercropping with legume for agroecological cropping systems: Complementarity and facilitation processes and the importance of soil microorganisms. A review , 2017 .

[8]  Rakesh Kumar,et al.  Effect of phosphorus and zinc nutrition on growth and yield of fodder cowpea , 2016 .

[9]  H. Høgh-jensen,et al.  Competition for and utilisation of sulfur in sole and intercrops of pea and barley , 2007, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[10]  Y. S. Shivay,et al.  Effect of conservation agricultural practices and nitrogen management on growth, physiological indices, yield and nutrient uptake of soybean (Glycine max) , 2018 .

[11]  M. Ramroudi,et al.  Effect of maize (Zea mays L.) - cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) intercropping on light distribution, soil temperature and soil moisture in arid environment , 2010 .

[12]  J. P. Mittal,et al.  Energy in production agriculture , 1992 .

[13]  R. W. Willey Resource use in intercropping systems , 1990 .

[14]  R. W. Willey Intercropping Its Importance And Research Needs Part 1. Competition And Yield Advantages Vol-32 , 1979 .