A genomic code for nucleosome positioning

Eukaryotic genomes are packaged into nucleosome particles that occlude the DNA from interacting with most DNA binding proteins. Nucleosomes have higher affinity for particular DNA sequences, reflecting the ability of the sequence to bend sharply, as required by the nucleosome structure. However, it is not known whether these sequence preferences have a significant influence on nucleosome position in vivo, and thus regulate the access of other proteins to DNA. Here we isolated nucleosome-bound sequences at high resolution from yeast and used these sequences in a new computational approach to construct and validate experimentally a nucleosome–DNA interaction model, and to predict the genome-wide organization of nucleosomes. Our results demonstrate that genomes encode an intrinsic nucleosome organization and that this intrinsic organization can explain ∼50% of the in vivo nucleosome positions. This nucleosome positioning code may facilitate specific chromosome functions including transcription factor binding, transcription initiation, and even remodelling of the nucleosomes themselves.

[1]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[2]  E. Trifonov,et al.  Sequence-dependent deformational anisotropy of chromatin DNA. , 1980, Nucleic acids research.

[3]  A. Hinnen,et al.  Removal of positioned nucleosomes from the yeast PHO5 promoter upon PHO5 induction releases additional upstream activating DNA elements. , 1986, The EMBO journal.

[4]  H. Drew,et al.  Sequence periodicities in chicken nucleosome core DNA. , 1986, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  Lawrence R. Rabiner,et al.  A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition , 1989, Proc. IEEE.

[6]  M. Shimizu,et al.  Nucleosomes are positioned with base pair precision adjacent to the alpha 2 operator in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1991, The EMBO journal.

[7]  J. Tsang,et al.  Chromatin structure modulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by centromere and promoter factor 1 , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[8]  L. Verdone,et al.  Chromatin remodeling during Saccharomyces cerevisiae ADH2 gene activation , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[9]  R. Simpson,et al.  Cell type‐specific chromatin organization of the region that governs directionality of yeast mating type switching , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[10]  D M Crothers,et al.  Identification and characterization of genomic nucleosome-positioning sequences. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  V. Zhurkin,et al.  DNA sequence-dependent deformability deduced from protein-DNA crystal complexes. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  S Holmberg,et al.  Nucleosome structure of the yeast CHA1 promoter: analysis of activation‐dependent chromatin remodeling of an RNA‐polymerase‐II‐transcribed gene in TBP and RNA pol II mutants defective in vivo in response to acidic activators , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[13]  J. Widom,et al.  New DNA sequence rules for high affinity binding to histone octamer and sequence-directed nucleosome positioning. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  R. Simpson,et al.  High-Resolution Structural Analysis of Chromatin at Specific Loci: Saccharomyces cerevisiae Silent Mating-Type Locus HMRa , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[15]  R. Kornberg,et al.  Twenty-Five Years of the Nucleosome, Fundamental Particle of the Eukaryote Chromosome , 1999, Cell.

[16]  John J. Wyrick,et al.  Chromosomal landscape of nucleosome-dependent gene expression and silencing in yeast , 1999, Nature.

[17]  J. Widom,et al.  Sequence motifs and free energies of selected natural and non-natural nucleosome positioning DNA sequences. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  Yudong D. He,et al.  Functional Discovery via a Compendium of Expression Profiles , 2000, Cell.

[19]  P. Brown,et al.  Whole-genome expression analysis of snf/swi mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[21]  D. Botstein,et al.  Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[22]  C. Bustamante,et al.  Pulling a single chromatin fiber reveals the forces that maintain its higher-order structure. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  J. Widom,et al.  Poly(dA-dT) Promoter Elements Increase the Equilibrium Accessibility of Nucleosomal DNA Target Sites , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[24]  Roger E Bumgarner,et al.  Integrated genomic and proteomic analyses of a systematically perturbed metabolic network. , 2001, Science.

[25]  J. Widom,et al.  Role of DNA sequence in nucleosome stability and dynamics , 2001, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[26]  C. Allis,et al.  Translating the Histone Code , 2001, Science.

[27]  M. Smerdon,et al.  Nucleosome Structure and Repair of N-Methylpurines in the GAL1-10 Genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[28]  Eric D Siggia,et al.  Identification of the binding sites of regulatory proteins in bacterial genomes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Global analysis of protein expression in yeast , 2003, Nature.

[30]  T. Richmond,et al.  The structure of DNA in the nucleosome core , 2003, Nature.

[31]  Nicola J. Rinaldi,et al.  Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome , 2004, Nature.

[32]  J. Widom,et al.  Nucleosomal locations of dominant DNA sequence motifs for histone-DNA interactions and nucleosome positioning. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  Nicola J. Rinaldi,et al.  Global position and recruitment of HATs and HDACs in the yeast genome. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[34]  Pamela A. Silver,et al.  Genome-Wide Localization of the Nuclear Transport Machinery Couples Transcriptional Status and Nuclear Organization , 2004, Cell.

[35]  V. Iyer,et al.  Global Role of TATA Box-Binding Protein Recruitment to Promoters in Mediating Gene Expression Profiles , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[36]  J. Lieb,et al.  Evidence for nucleosome depletion at active regulatory regions genome-wide , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[37]  B. Pugh,et al.  Identification and Distinct Regulation of Yeast TATA Box-Containing Genes , 2004, Cell.

[38]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Global nucleosome occupancy in yeast , 2004, Genome Biology.

[39]  Jonathan Widom,et al.  Improved alignment of nucleosome DNA sequences using a mixture model , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[40]  Lani F. Wu,et al.  Genome-Scale Identification of Nucleosome Positions in S. cerevisiae , 2005, Science.

[41]  Kevin Struhl,et al.  Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions and low nucleosome density are important for preferential accessibility of promoter regions in yeast. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[42]  Mathieu Blanchette,et al.  Variant Histone H2A.Z Is Globally Localized to the Promoters of Inactive Yeast Genes and Regulates Nucleosome Positioning , 2005, PLoS biology.

[43]  B. Cairns,et al.  Chromatin remodeling complexes: strength in diversity, precision through specialization. , 2005, Current opinion in genetics & development.