A Comparative Study of Wireless Protocols: Bluetooth, UWB, ZigBee, and Wi-Fi

Bluetooth (over IEEE 802.15.1), ultra-wideband (UWB, over IEEE 802.15.3), ZigBee (over IEEE 802.15.4), and Wi-Fi (over IEEE 802.11) are four protocol standards for short- range wireless communications with low power consumption. From an application point of view, bluetooth is intended for a cordless mouse, keyboard, and hands-free headset, UWB is oriented to high-bandwidth multimedia links, ZigBee is designed for reliable wirelessly networked monitoring and control networks, while Wi-Fi is directed at computer-to-computer connections as an extension or substitution of cabled networks. In this paper, we provide a study of these popular wireless communication standards, evaluating their main features and behaviors in terms of various metrics, including the transmission time, data coding efficiency, complexity, and power consumption. It is believed that the comparison presented in this paper would benefit application engineers in selecting an appropriate protocol.

[1]  James Moyne,et al.  Performance evaluation of control networks: Ethernet, ControlNet, and DeviceNet , 2001 .

[2]  Erina Ferro,et al.  Bluetooth and Wi-Fi wireless protocols: a survey and a comparison , 2005, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[3]  Jin-Shyan Lee,et al.  ITRI ZBnode: A ZigBee/IEEE 802.15.4 Platform for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[4]  Jun Zhao,et al.  Comparison of IEEE 802.11e and IEEE 802.15.3 MAC , 2004, Proceedings of the IEEE 6th Circuits and Systems Symposium on Emerging Technologies: Frontiers of Mobile and Wireless Communication (IEEE Cat. No.04EX710).

[5]  K. Shuaib,et al.  Co-existence of Zigbee and WLAN, A Performance Study , 2006, 2006 Wireless Telecommunications Symposium.

[6]  Walter Hirt,et al.  Composite Reconfigurable Wireless Networks: the Eu R&d Path towards 4g , 2022 .

[7]  N. Baker,et al.  ZigBee and Bluetooth strengths and weaknesses for industrial applications , 2005 .

[8]  Jin-Shyan Lee,et al.  Performance evaluation of IEEE 802.15.4 for low-rate wireless personal area networks , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics.

[9]  Andreas Willig,et al.  An architecture for wireless extension of PROFIBUS , 2003, IECON'03. 29th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37468).

[10]  A. Sikora,et al.  Coexistence of IEEE802.15.4 with other Systems in the 2.4 GHz-ISM-Band , 2005, 2005 IEEE Instrumentationand Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings.

[11]  P. S. Neelakanta,et al.  Robust factory wireless communications: a performance appraisal of the Bluetooth/spl trade/ and the ZigBee/spl trade/ colocated on an industrial floor , 2003, IECON'03. 29th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37468).