Observed dynamic soil–structure interaction in scale testing of offshore wind turbine foundations

Monopile foundations have been commonly used to support offshore wind turbine generators (WTGs), but this type of foundation encounters economic and technical limitations for larger WTGs in water depths exceeding 30 m. Offshore wind farm projects are increasingly turning to alternative multipod foundations (for example tetrapod, jacket and tripods) supported on shallow foundations to reduce the environmental effects of piling noise. However the characteristics of these foundations under dynamic loading or long term cyclic wind turbine loading are not fully understood. This paper summarises the results from a series of small scaled tests (1:100, 1:150 and 1:200) of a complete National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) wind turbine model on three types of foundations: monopiles, symmetric tetrapod and asymmetric tripod. The test bed used consists of either kaolin clay or sand and up to 1.4 million loading cycles were applied. The results showed that the multipod foundations (symmetric or asymmetric) exhibit two closely spaced natural frequencies corresponding to the rocking modes of vibration in two principle axes. Furthermore, the corresponding two spectral peaks change with repeated cycles of loading and they converge for symmetric tetrapods but not for asymmetric tripods. From the fatigue design point of view, the two spectral peaks for multipod foundations broaden the range of frequencies that can be excited by the broadband nature of the environmental loading (wind and wave) thereby impacting the extent of motions. Thus the system lifespan (number of cycles to failure) may effectively increase for symmetric foundations as the two peaks will tend to converge. However, for asymmetric foundations the system life may continue to be affected adversely as the two peaks will not converge. In this sense, designers should prefer symmetric foundations to asymmetric foundations.

[1]  Subhamoy Bhattacharya,et al.  Similitude relationships for physical modelling of monopile-supported offshore wind turbines , 2011 .

[2]  Subhamoy Bhattacharya,et al.  Dynamic soil–structure interaction of monopile supported wind turbines in cohesive soil , 2013 .

[3]  Milos Novak,et al.  Resistance of soil to a horizontally vibrating pile , 1977 .

[4]  Domenico Lombardi Dynamics of Offshore Wind Turbines , 2010 .

[5]  V. Drnevich,et al.  SHEAR MODULUS AND DAMPING IN SOILS: DESIGN EQUATIONS AND CURVES , 1972 .

[6]  James Doherty,et al.  Stiffness of Flexible Caisson Foundations Embedded in Nonhomogeneous Elastic Soil , 2005 .

[7]  Martin Achmus,et al.  Minimum Embedded Length of Cyclic Horizontally Loaded Monopiles , 2012 .

[8]  Lars Vabbersgaard Andersen,et al.  Lumped-parameter Model of a Bucket Foundation: , 2009 .

[9]  Byron W. Byrne,et al.  Suction caissons for wind turbines , 2005 .

[10]  Subhamoy Bhattacharya,et al.  Dynamics of offshore wind turbines supported on two foundations , 2013 .

[11]  Subhamoy Bhattacharya,et al.  Dynamic Analysis of Wind Turbine Towers on Flexible Foundations , 2012 .

[12]  Subhamoy Bhattacharya,et al.  Vibrations of wind-turbines considering soil-structure interaction , 2011 .

[13]  Subhamoy Bhattacharya,et al.  Experimental validation of soil–structure interaction of offshore wind turbines , 2011 .

[14]  P. Welch The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms , 1967 .

[15]  M. B. Zaaijer Comparison of monopile, tripod, suction bucket and gravity base design for a 6 MW turbine , 2003 .

[16]  Martin Achmus,et al.  Behavior of monopile foundations under cyclic lateral load , 2009 .

[17]  M. B. Zaaijer,et al.  Foundation models for the dynamic response of offshore wind turbines , 2002 .

[18]  Peter Schaumann,et al.  Special fatigue aspects in support structures of offshore wind turbines , 2011 .

[19]  Werner Rücker,et al.  On the quasi-static granular convective flow and sand densification around pile foundations under cyclic lateral loading , 2012 .