Informative Dropout for Robust Representation Learning: A Shape-bias Perspective
暂无分享,去创建一个
Zhanxing Zhu | Yadong Mu | Jingdong Wang | Dinghuai Zhang | Qi Dai | Baifeng Shi | Yadong Mu | Zhanxing Zhu | Jingdong Wang | Baifeng Shi | Dinghuai Zhang | Qi Dai
[1] A. L. Yarbus,et al. Eye Movements and Vision , 1967, Springer US.
[2] R. Kail,et al. Learning in children : progress in cognitive development research , 1983 .
[3] I. Biederman. Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.
[4] Linda B. Smith,et al. The importance of shape in early lexical learning , 1988 .
[5] S. Lam. Texture feature extraction using gray level gradient based co-occurence matrices , 1996, 1996 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Information Intelligence and Systems (Cat. No.96CH35929).
[6] H. Shimodaira,et al. Improving predictive inference under covariate shift by weighting the log-likelihood function , 2000 .
[7] P. Bloom,et al. How specific is the shape bias? , 2003, Child development.
[8] Horst Bischof,et al. Attentive Object Detection Using an Information Theoretic Saliency Measure , 2004, WAPCV.
[9] Jitendra Malik,et al. An Information Maximization Model of Eye Movements , 2004, NIPS.
[10] John K. Tsotsos,et al. Saliency Based on Information Maximization , 2005, NIPS.
[11] Sang Joon Kim,et al. A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .
[12] Bernhard Schölkopf,et al. A Kernel Method for the Two-Sample-Problem , 2006, NIPS.
[13] G. Griffin,et al. Caltech-256 Object Category Dataset , 2007 .
[14] A. Streri,et al. Perception of object shape and texture in human newborns: evidence from cross-modal transfer tasks. , 2007, Developmental science.
[15] Liqing Zhang,et al. Saliency Detection: A Spectral Residual Approach , 2007, 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
[16] Li Fei-Fei,et al. ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database , 2009, CVPR.
[17] John K. Tsotsos,et al. Saliency, attention, and visual search: an information theoretic approach. , 2009, Journal of vision.
[18] Christof Koch,et al. A Model of Saliency-Based Visual Attention for Rapid Scene Analysis , 2009 .
[19] Alex Krizhevsky,et al. Learning Multiple Layers of Features from Tiny Images , 2009 .
[20] Karsten M. Borgwardt,et al. Covariate Shift by Kernel Mean Matching , 2009, NIPS 2009.
[21] Jianqin Zhou,et al. On discrete cosine transform , 2011, ArXiv.
[22] Marc Alexa,et al. How do humans sketch objects? , 2012, ACM Trans. Graph..
[23] Alexei A. Efros,et al. Undoing the Damage of Dataset Bias , 2012, ECCV.
[24] Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.
[25] Bernhard Schölkopf,et al. Domain Generalization via Invariant Feature Representation , 2013, ICML.
[26] Rob Fergus,et al. Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networks , 2013, ECCV.
[27] Nitish Srivastava,et al. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[28] Joan Bruna,et al. Intriguing properties of neural networks , 2013, ICLR.
[29] Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al. Deep neural networks: a new framework for modelling biological vision and brain information processing , 2015, bioRxiv.
[30] Michael I. Jordan,et al. Learning Transferable Features with Deep Adaptation Networks , 2015, ICML.
[31] George Trigeorgis,et al. Domain Separation Networks , 2016, NIPS.
[32] Jian Sun,et al. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).
[33] Guigang Zhang,et al. Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..
[34] Ricardo Matsumura de Araújo,et al. On the Performance of GoogLeNet and AlexNet Applied to Sketches , 2016, AAAI.
[35] Oriol Vinyals,et al. Matching Networks for One Shot Learning , 2016, NIPS.
[36] Hugo Larochelle,et al. Optimization as a Model for Few-Shot Learning , 2016, ICLR.
[37] Yoshua Bengio,et al. Measuring the tendency of CNNs to Learn Surface Statistical Regularities , 2017, ArXiv.
[38] Samuel Ritter,et al. Cognitive Psychology for Deep Neural Networks: A Shape Bias Case Study , 2017, ICML.
[39] Gabriela Csurka,et al. Domain Adaptation in Computer Vision Applications , 2017, Advances in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
[40] Lina J. Karam,et al. A Study and Comparison of Human and Deep Learning Recognition Performance under Visual Distortions , 2017, 2017 26th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN).
[41] Yongxin Yang,et al. Deeper, Broader and Artier Domain Generalization , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).
[42] Serge J. Belongie,et al. Arbitrary Style Transfer in Real-Time with Adaptive Instance Normalization , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).
[43] Richard S. Zemel,et al. Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learning , 2017, NIPS.
[44] Martin Wattenberg,et al. SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noise , 2017, ArXiv.
[45] Matthias Bethge,et al. Comparing deep neural networks against humans: object recognition when the signal gets weaker , 2017, ArXiv.
[46] Artëm Yankov,et al. Few-Shot Learning with Metric-Agnostic Conditional Embeddings , 2018, ArXiv.
[47] Swami Sankaranarayanan,et al. MetaReg: Towards Domain Generalization using Meta-Regularization , 2018, NeurIPS.
[48] Aleksander Madry,et al. Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attacks , 2017, ICLR.
[49] Yongxin Yang,et al. Learning to Generalize: Meta-Learning for Domain Generalization , 2017, AAAI.
[50] Alex ChiChung Kot,et al. Domain Generalization with Adversarial Feature Learning , 2018, 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
[51] Ondrej Chum,et al. Deep Shape Matching , 2017, ECCV.
[52] Tao Xiang,et al. Learning to Compare: Relation Network for Few-Shot Learning , 2017, 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
[53] Barbara Caputo,et al. Domain Generalization with Domain-Specific Aggregation Modules , 2018, GCPR.
[54] Barbara Caputo,et al. Best Sources Forward: Domain Generalization through Source-Specific Nets , 2018, 2018 25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).
[55] Matthias Bethge,et al. ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustness , 2018, ICLR.
[56] Natalia Gimelshein,et al. PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library , 2019, NeurIPS.
[57] Eric P. Xing,et al. Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Power , 2019, NeurIPS.
[58] Thomas G. Dietterich,et al. Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbations , 2018, ICLR.
[59] Mingjie Sun,et al. Shape Features Improve General Model Robustness , 2019 .
[60] Zhanxing Zhu,et al. Interpreting Adversarially Trained Convolutional Neural Networks , 2019, ICML.
[61] Fabio Maria Carlucci,et al. Domain Generalization by Solving Jigsaw Puzzles , 2019, 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).
[62] Matthias Bethge,et al. Approximating CNNs with Bag-of-local-Features models works surprisingly well on ImageNet , 2019, ICLR.
[63] Eric P. Xing,et al. Learning Robust Representations by Projecting Superficial Statistics Out , 2018, ICLR.
[64] Yu-Chiang Frank Wang,et al. A Closer Look at Few-shot Classification , 2019, ICLR.
[65] Yair Weiss,et al. Why do deep convolutional networks generalize so poorly to small image transformations? , 2018, J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[66] H. Larochelle,et al. Are Few-shot Learning Benchmarks Too Simple ? , 2019 .
[67] Bin Dong,et al. You Only Propagate Once: Accelerating Adversarial Training via Maximal Principle , 2019, NeurIPS.
[68] Nic Ford,et al. Adversarial Examples Are a Natural Consequence of Test Error in Noise , 2019, ICML.
[69] Stefano Soatto,et al. A Baseline for Few-Shot Image Classification , 2019, ICLR.