Top-Down Network Analysis to Drive Bottom-Up Modeling of Physiological Processes

Top-down analyses in systems biology can automatically find correlations among genes and proteins in large-scale datasets. However, it is often difficult to design experiments from these results. In contrast, bottom-up approaches painstakingly craft detailed models that can be simulated computationally to suggest wet lab experiments. However, developing the models is a manual process that can take many years. These approaches have largely been developed independently. We present LINKER, an efficient and automated data-driven method that can analyze molecular interactomes to propose extensions to models that can be simulated. LINKER combines teleporting random walks and k-shortest path computations to discover connections from a source protein to a set of proteins collectively involved in a particular cellular process. We evaluate the efficacy of LINKER by applying it to a well-known dynamic model of the cell division cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Compared to other state-of-the-art methods, subnetworks computed by LINKER are heavily enriched in Gene Ontology (GO) terms relevant to the cell cycle. Finally, we highlight how networks computed by LINKER elucidate the role of a protein kinase (Cdc5) in the mitotic exit network of a dynamic model of the cell cycle.

[1]  D. Karger,et al.  Bridging high-throughput genetic and transcriptional data reveals cellular responses to alpha-synuclein toxicity , 2009, Nature Genetics.

[2]  A. Arkin,et al.  Stochastic kinetic analysis of developmental pathway bifurcation in phage lambda-infected Escherichia coli cells. , 1998, Genetics.

[3]  Katherine C. Chen,et al.  Integrative analysis of cell cycle control in budding yeast. , 2004, Molecular biology of the cell.

[4]  Christian Borgs,et al.  Finding undetected protein associations in cell signaling by belief propagation , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Mike Tyers,et al.  Systematic Identification of Pathways That Couple Cell Growth and Division in Yeast , 2002, Science.

[6]  Rajeev Motwani,et al.  The PageRank Citation Ranking : Bringing Order to the Web , 1999, WWW 1999.

[7]  Luke Hunter,et al.  Interpreting Metabolomic Profiles using Unbiased Pathway Models , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[8]  Matteo Fischetti,et al.  An Algorithmic Framework for the Exact Solution of the Prize-Collecting Steiner Tree Problem , 2006, Math. Program..

[9]  Peter N. Robinson,et al.  GOing Bayesian: model-based gene set analysis of genome-scale data , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  Patrick G. A. Pedrioli,et al.  Phosphoproteomic Analysis Reveals Interconnected System-Wide Responses to Perturbations of Kinases and Phosphatases in Yeast , 2010, Science Signaling.

[11]  J. Y. Yen,et al.  Finding the K Shortest Loopless Paths in a Network , 2007 .

[12]  Michael Schroeder,et al.  Google Goes Cancer: Improving Outcome Prediction for Cancer Patients by Network-Based Ranking of Marker Genes , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[13]  Tobias Müller,et al.  Identifying functional modules in protein–protein interaction networks: an integrated exact approach , 2008, ISMB.

[14]  Carl Kingsford,et al.  The power of protein interaction networks for associating genes with diseases , 2010, Bioinform..

[15]  T. M. Murali,et al.  Network-Based Prediction and Analysis of HIV Dependency Factors , 2011, RECOMB.

[16]  B. Palsson,et al.  The model organism as a system: integrating 'omics' data sets , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[17]  Kara Dolinski,et al.  The BioGRID Interaction Database: 2011 update , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[18]  Markus J. Herrgård,et al.  Integrating high-throughput and computational data elucidates bacterial networks , 2004, Nature.

[19]  L. Johnston,et al.  Order of function of the budding-yeast mitotic exit-network proteins Tem1, Cdc15, Mob1, Dbf2, and Cdc5 , 2001, Current Biology.

[20]  Michael A. White,et al.  Use of Data-Biased Random Walks on Graphs for the Retrieval of Context-Specific Networks from Genomic Data , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[21]  Yolanda T. Chong,et al.  A quantitative literature-curated gold standard for kinase-substrate pairs , 2011, Genome Biology.

[22]  U. Alon,et al.  Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis , 2022 .

[23]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Network medicine : a network-based approach to human disease , 2010 .

[24]  Kyung S. Lee,et al.  Bfa1 can regulate Tem1 function independently of Bub2 in the mitotic exit network of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  R. Sharan,et al.  Toward accurate reconstruction of functional protein networks , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[26]  Roded Sharan,et al.  Associating Genes and Protein Complexes with Disease via Network Propagation , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[27]  E. Fraenkel,et al.  Integrating Proteomic, Transcriptional, and Interactome Data Reveals Hidden Components of Signaling and Regulatory Networks , 2009, Science Signaling.

[28]  Alexandre P. Francisco,et al.  YEASTRACT: providing a programmatic access to curated transcriptional regulatory associations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through a web services interface , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..