Constraints on the evolution of adaptive plasticity: costs of plasticity to density are expressed in segregating progenies.

Phenotypic plasticity, the ability of a genotype to express different phenotypes across environments, is an adaptive strategy expected to evolve in heterogeneous environments. One widely held hypothesis is that the evolutionary benefits of plasticity are reduced by its costs, but when compared with the number of traits tested, the evidence for costs is limited. Selection gradients were calculated for traits and trait plasticities to test for costs of plasticity to density in a field study using recombinant inbred lines (RILs) of Brassica rapa. Significant costs of putatively adaptive plasticity were found in three out of six measured traits. For one trait, petiole length, a cost of plasticity was detected in both environments tested; such global costs are expected to more strongly constrain the evolution of plasticity than local costs expressed in a single environment. These results, in combination with evidence from studies in segregating progenies of Arabidopsis thaliana, suggest that the potential for genetic costs of plasticity exists in natural populations. Detection of costs in previous studies may have been limited because historical selection has purged genotypes with costly plasticity, and experimental conditions often lack environmental stresses.

[1]  Mark van Kleunen,et al.  Constraints on the evolution of adaptive phenotypic plasticity in plants. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[2]  Harry Smith,et al.  The function, action and adaptive significance of phytochrome in light-grown plants , 1989 .

[3]  Johanna Schmitt,et al.  Testing the Adaptive Plasticity Hypothesis: Density-Dependent Selection on Manipulated Stem Length in Impatiens capensis , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[4]  J. Schmitt,et al.  Genetic differentiation in morphological responses to simulated foliage shade between populations of Impatiens capensis from open and woodland sites. , 1995 .

[5]  J. Stinchcombe,et al.  Flowering time plasticity in Arabidopsis thaliana: a reanalysis of Westerman & Lawrence (1970) , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[6]  C. Weinig DIFFERING SELECTION IN ALTERNATIVE COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENTS: SHADE‐AVOIDANCE RESPONSES AND GERMINATION TIMING , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[7]  Johanna Schmitt,et al.  A Test of the Adaptive Plasticity Hypothesis Using Transgenic and Mutant Plants Disabled in Phytochrome-Mediated Elongation Responses to Neighbors , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[8]  S. Sultan,et al.  Metapopulation Structure Favors Plasticity over Local Adaptation , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[9]  R. Levins THEORY OF FITNESS IN A HETEROGENEOUS ENVIRONMENT. 3. THE RESPONSE TO SELECTION. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  J. Schmitt,et al.  Light spectral quality, phytochrome and plant competition. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  M. West-Eberhard,et al.  Developmental plasticity and the origin of species differences , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  K. Hinata,et al.  Taxonomy, cytogenetics and origin of crop brassicas, a review. , 1980 .

[13]  D. Wilson,et al.  Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[14]  C. Lively COMPETITION, COMPARATIVE LIFE HISTORIES, AND MAINTENANCE OF SHELL DIMORPHISM IN A BARNACLE' , 1986 .

[15]  J. Schmitt,et al.  TESTING ADAPTIVE PLASTICITY TO UV: COSTS AND BENEFITS OF STEM ELONGATION AND LIGHT‐INDUCED PHENOLICS , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[16]  M. Stanton,et al.  Evolution in stressful environments II: adaptive value and costs of plasticity in response to low light in Sinapis arvensis , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[17]  C. Schlichting Phenotypic plasticity in plants , 2002 .

[18]  R. Relyea Costs of Phenotypic Plasticity , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[19]  COSTS OF PLASTICITY IN FORAGING CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CLONAL PLANT RANUNCULUS REPTANS , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[20]  C. Ballaré,et al.  Phytochrome signalling in plant canopies: testing its population‐level implications with photoreceptor mutants of Arabidopsis , 1997 .

[21]  P. V. Tienderen,et al.  EVOLUTION OF GENERALISTS AND SPECIALISTS IN SPATIALLY HETEROGENEOUS ENVIRONMENTS. , 1991 .

[22]  John Milton Poehlman,et al.  Breeding Field Crops , 1959 .

[23]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT OF SELECTION ON CORRELATED CHARACTERS , 1983, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[24]  H. de Kroon,et al.  Shade avoidance in Trifolium repens: costs and benefits of plasticity in petiole length and leaf size. , 2006, The New phytologist.

[25]  ECOLOGICAL GENETICS OF AN INDUCED PLANT DEFENSE AGAINST HERBIVORES: ADDITIVE GENETIC VARIANCE AND COSTS OF PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  PLASTICITY TO LIGHT CUES AND RESOURCES IN ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA: TESTING FOR ADAPTIVE VALUE AND COSTS , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[27]  C. Weinig PLASTICITY VERSUS CANALIZATION: POPULATION DIFFERENCES IN THE TIMING OF SHADE‐AVOIDANCE RESPONSES , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[28]  E. H. Pyle,et al.  EVIDENCE OF ADAPTIVE DIVERGENCE IN PLASTICITY: DENSITY‐ AND SITE‐DEPENDENT SELECTION ON SHADE‐AVOIDANCE RESPONSES IN IMPATIENS CAPENSIS , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  R. Schmid,et al.  World Weeds: Natural Histories and Distribution , 1997 .

[30]  R. Levins Theory of Fitness in a Heterogeneous Environment. II. Developmental Flexibility and Niche Selection , 1963, The American Naturalist.

[31]  J. Chory,et al.  Light: an indicator of time and place. , 2000, Genes & development.

[32]  T. Mitchell-Olds,et al.  REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF NATURAL SELECTION: STATISTICAL INFERENCE AND BIOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[33]  Harry Smith,et al.  Light Quality, Photoperception, and Plant Strategy , 1982 .

[34]  D. Berrigan,et al.  THE GENETICS OF PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY. VIII. THE COST OF PLASTICITY IN DAPHNIA PULEX , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[35]  C. Weinig,et al.  Local and Global Costs of Adaptive Plasticity to Density in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[36]  E. V. von Wettberg,et al.  Frequency and Microenvironmental Pattern of Selection on Plastic Shade‐Avoidance Traits in a Natural Population of Impatiens capensis , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[37]  H. Callahan,et al.  Plasticity genes and plasticity costs: a new approach using an Arabidopsis recombinant inbred population. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[38]  Anurag A. Agrawal,et al.  Phenotypic Plasticity in the Interactions and Evolution of Species , 2001, Science.