Second Order Stationarity and Spatiochromatic Properties of Natural Images

In this contribution we show that two basic assumptions on the covariance matrices of color images are enough to explain the appearance of spatiochromatic features given by Fourier descriptors in the luminance plus color opponent channels. The first of these assumptions is second order stationarity while the second one is commutativity between color correlation matrices. The validity of these assumptions are experimentally studied on two large image databases. As a lateral result of this study, we also provide novel data to support an exponential decay law of the spatiochromatic covariance between pairs of pixels as a function of their spatial distance instead of the commonly assumed power-law behavior.

[1]  T. Kanade,et al.  Color information for region segmentation , 1980 .

[2]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Natural Image Statistics - A Probabilistic Approach to Early Computational Vision , 2009, Computational Imaging and Vision.

[3]  Alexei A. Efros,et al.  Scene completion using millions of photographs , 2008, Commun. ACM.

[4]  Zhaoping Li,et al.  Understanding Retinal Color Coding from First Principles , 1992, Neural Computation.

[5]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[6]  G. Buchsbaum,et al.  Trichromacy, opponent colours coding and optimum colour information transmission in the retina , 1983, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[7]  D. Ruderman,et al.  Statistics of cone responses to natural images: implications for visual coding , 1998 .

[8]  William Bialek,et al.  Statistics of Natural Images: Scaling in the Woods , 1993, NIPS.

[9]  David J. Field,et al.  Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: A strategy employed by V1? , 1997, Vision Research.

[10]  D. L. Macadam.  Chromatic adaptation. , 1956, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[11]  David Mumford,et al.  Statistics of natural images and models , 1999, Proceedings. 1999 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Cat. No PR00149).

[12]  Gershon Buchsbaum,et al.  A computational model of spatiochromatic image coding in early vision , 1991, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[13]  Robert M. Gray,et al.  Toeplitz and Circulant Matrices: A Review , 2005, Found. Trends Commun. Inf. Theory.

[14]  J. Moran,et al.  Sensation and perception , 1980 .

[15]  Robert J. Plemmons,et al.  Nonnegative Matrices in the Mathematical Sciences , 1979, Classics in Applied Mathematics.

[16]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Spatiochromatic Properties of Natural Images and Human Vision , 2002, Current Biology.

[17]  Daniel L. Ruderman,et al.  Origins of scaling in natural images , 1996, Vision Research.