FOUNDING A NEW SCIENCE: MIND GENOMICS

We present in this article our vision for a new science, modeled on the emerging science of genomics and the technology of informatics. Our goal in this new science is to better understand how people react to ideas in a formal and structured way, using the principles of stimulus–response (from experimental psychology), conjoint analysis (from consumer research and statistics), Internet-based testing (from marketing research) and multiple tests to identify patterns of mind-sets (patterned after genomics). We show how this formal approach can then be used to construct new, innovative ideas in business. We demonstrate the approach using the development of new ideas for an electronic color palette for cosmetic products to be used by consumers.

[1]  Patrick Suppes,et al.  Basic measurement theory , 1962 .

[2]  H. Moskowitz,et al.  The Four Segments of Yogurt Consumers: Preferences and Mind-Sets , 2005 .

[3]  What Makes People Crave Fast Foods , 2002 .

[4]  Sebastiano Porretta,et al.  Concept Research in Food Product Design and Development , 2005 .

[5]  H. Moskowitz,et al.  Sensory benefits, emotions and usage patterns for olives: using Internet-based conjoint analysis and segmentation to understand patterns of response , 2005 .

[6]  Ben van Ommen,et al.  Nutrigenomics: exploiting systems biology in the nutrition and health arena. , 2002, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[7]  H. Moskowitz,et al.  WHAT FEATURES DRIVE RATED BURGER CRAVEABILITY AT THE CONCEPT LEVEL , 2004 .

[8]  H. Moskowitz,et al.  HISPANIC AND NON‐HISPANIC RESPONSES TO CONCEPTS FOR FOUR FOODS , 2004 .

[9]  H. Moskowitz,et al.  MIND‐SETS OF THE WINE CONSUMER , 2004 .

[10]  Howard R. Moskowitz,et al.  Large-Scale Concept-Response Databases for Food and Drink Using Conjoint Analysis, Segmentation and Databasing , 2005 .

[11]  Dick R. Wittink,et al.  Commercial use of conjoint analysis in Europe: Results and critical reflections , 1994 .

[12]  W. Wells Psychographics: A Critical Review , 1975 .

[13]  J Bruce German,et al.  Metabolomics and biochemical profiling in drug discovery and development. , 2002, Current opinion in molecular therapeutics.

[14]  R. Luce,et al.  Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement , 1964 .

[15]  Vithala R. Rao,et al.  Conjoint Measurement- for Quantifying Judgmental Data , 1971 .

[16]  J. Suls,et al.  Flawed Self-Assessment , 2004, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[17]  P. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook , 1978 .

[18]  I. Saguy,et al.  Unveiling Health Attitudes and Creating Good-For-You Foods: The Genomics Metaphor, Consumer Innovative Web-Based Technologies , 2005, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[19]  F. Collins,et al.  A vision for the future of genomics research , 2003, Nature.

[20]  N. Anderson Functional measurement and psychophysical judgment. , 1970, Psychological review.

[21]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Winning at new products : accelerating the process from idea to launch , 2001 .

[22]  Howard R. Moskowitz,et al.  Rapid, inexpensive, actionable concept generation and optimization: the use and promise of self‐authoring conjoint analysis for the food service industry , 2001 .