Recent exploration missions to celestial bodies have shown an increasing demand for surface based landers and rovers designed to perform experiments on the ground, rather than relying purely on traditional orbiting observatories. Many of the scientifically interesting locations have proven hazardous and difficult to reach and traverse, driving the need for different methods of locomotion. Some of these locations lie in deep, permanently shadowed craters or in rocky, highly uneven landscapes. Various wheeled, flying, jumping, and legged rovers have been proposed. Those chosen for development have experienced both success and problems alike. Even stationary landers, such as the Philae lander which attempted to perform a controlled landing onto a comet surface, encountered unforgiving terrain causing it to bounce multiple times due to the ineffectiveness of its two on-board anchoring mechanisms. A new generation of legged rovers and landers is envisioned to utilize dynamic anchors on the feet of its legs to claw into the surface, engaging and disengaging with each step or landing. A method for simulating and evaluating the performance of these dynamic anchors is proposed to aid in-progress surface missions with relatively quick response to new target data. Discrete Element Method software is used to simulate a lunar-like regolith medium and the interaction of a dynamic anchor with this medium. The engagement, holding, and disengagement forces are recorded during this simulation. Physical testing was performed by using a robotic arm to engage a series of anchors with a lunar regolith simulant while measuring the same three forces as the simulation. The actual test data efficient anchor geometry as determined during testing is compared to predicted data to evaluate the simulation accuracy. Calibration testing to determine suitable simulation parameters is also presented. Results show the applicable forces can be predicted well within an order of magnitude, but improvements are possible to predict soil behavior more accurately.
[1]
Aaron Parness,et al.
Anchoring foot mechanisms for sampling and mobility in microgravity
,
2011,
2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.
[2]
Philip T. Metzger,et al.
Soil Test Apparatus for Lunar Surfaces
,
2010,
2306.01080.
[4]
R. Sullivan,et al.
Discrete element modeling of a Mars Exploration Rover wheel in granular material
,
2012
.
[5]
Tamer M. Wasfy,et al.
Coupled Multibody Dynamics and Discrete Element Modeling of Vehicle Mobility on Cohesive Granular Terrains
,
2014
.
[6]
Eric Hand,et al.
Planetary Science. Philae probe makes bumpy touchdown on a comet.
,
2014,
Science.
[7]
Huei Peng,et al.
A Surrogate Discrete Element Method for Terramechanics Simulation of Granular Locomotion
,
2015
.
[8]
M. Cutkosky,et al.
Climbing Walls with Microspines
,
2006
.
[9]
Tamer M. Wasfy,et al.
Coupled Multibody Dynamics and Discrete Element Modeling of Bulldozers Cohesive Soil Moving Operation
,
2015
.
[10]
Joel Burdick,et al.
Wheel design and tension analysis for the tethered axel rover on extreme terrain
,
2009,
2009 IEEE Aerospace conference.
[11]
Roy Lichtenheldt,et al.
Locomotion on Soft Granular Soils: A Discrete Element based Approach for Simulations in Planetary Exploration
,
2013
.
[12]
Roy Lichtenheldt,et al.
Planetary rover locomotion on soft granular soils - Efficient adaption of the rolling behaviour of nonspherical grains for discrete element simulations
,
2013
.