Author Team Diversity and the Impact of Scientific Publications

Abstract In the second half of the 20th century, scientific research in physics, chemistry, and engineering began to focus on the use of large government-funded laboratories. This shift toward so-called big science also brought about a concomitant change in scientific work itself, with a sustained trend toward the use of highly specialized scientific teams, elevating the role of team characteristics on scientific outputs. The actual impact of scientific knowledge is commonly measured by how often peer-reviewed publications are, in turn, cited by other researchers. Therefore, how characteristics such as author team seniority, affiliation diversity, and size affect the overall impact of team publications was examined. Citation information and author demographics were reviewed for 123 articles published in Physical Review Letters from 2004 to 2006 and written by 476 scientists who used the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory's facilities. Correlation analysis indicated that author teams that were more multi-institutional and had homogeneous seniority tended to have more senior scientists. In addition, the analysis suggests that more mixed seniority author teams were likely to be less institutionally dispersed. Quantile regression was used to examine the relationships between author-team characteristics and publication impact. The analysis indicated that both weighted average seniority and average seniority had a negative relationship with the number of citations the publication received. Furthermore, the analysis also showed a positive relationship between first-author seniority and the number of citations, and a negative relationship between the number of authors and the number of citations.

[1]  Besiki Stvilia,et al.  A model for online consumer health information quality , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[2]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Scientific Collaborations at a Distance , 2001, Science.

[3]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[4]  Frank M. Andrews,et al.  Scientific Productivity: The Effectiveness of Research Groups in Six Countries , 2009 .

[5]  Eugen Tarnow,et al.  Coauthorship in physics , 2002, Science and engineering ethics.

[6]  J. A. Stewart,et al.  Achievement and Ascriptive Processes in the Recognition of Scientific Articles , 1983 .

[7]  D. Lindsey.  The Scientific Publication System In Social Science , 1978 .

[8]  Fabio Pellacini,et al.  Frequency and structure of long distance scholarly collaborations in a physics community , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  Bowling alone together: Academic writing as distributed cognition , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[10]  Joseph T. Banas,et al.  Comparing Alternative Conceptualizations of Functional Diversity in Management Teams: Process and Performance Effects , 2002 .

[11]  Halla Thorsteinsdóttir,et al.  External Research Collaboration in Two Small Science Systems , 2000, Scientometrics.

[12]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Team member proximity and teamwork in innovative projects , 2004 .

[13]  Francis Narin,et al.  Scientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers , 1991, Scientometrics.

[14]  Aparna Joshi,et al.  The Role Of Context In Work Team Diversity Research: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2009 .

[15]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaboration , 1990, CSCW '88.

[16]  Norman Kaplan,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1974 .

[17]  Wesley Shrum,et al.  The organization of scientific collaborations , 2002 .

[18]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .

[19]  Y. Gingras,et al.  The Effects of Aging on Researchers' Publication and Citation Patterns , 2008, PloS one.

[20]  Adam Worrall,et al.  Composition of scientific teams and publication productivity at a national science lab , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[21]  J. Sylvan Katz,et al.  Geographical proximity and scientific collaboration , 1994, Scientometrics.

[22]  T. D. Stokes,et al.  Coauthorship, Social Structure and Influence Within Specialties , 1989 .

[23]  B. Cade,et al.  A gentle introduction to quantile regression for ecologists , 2003 .

[24]  R. Merton.  The Normative Structure of Science , 1973 .

[25]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  On the epistemic significance of place , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[26]  William Goffman,et al.  Scientific information systems and the principle of selectivity , 1980 .

[27]  Dag W. Aksnes,et al.  Scientific Productivity and Group Size: A Bibliometric Analysis of Norwegian Microbiological Research , 2004, Scientometrics.

[28]  H. Echols.  Scientific Community , 1972, Nature.

[29]  Koen Frenken,et al.  The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration , 2007 .

[30]  L. Adrian,et al.  Creativity in Science , 2015 .

[31]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity , 2005 .

[32]  K. Brad Wray,et al.  The Epistemic Significance of Collaborative Research , 2002, Philosophy of Science.

[33]  Martha A. Harsanyi.  Multiple authors, multiple problems: bibliometrics and the study of scholarly collaboration: a literature review , 1993 .

[34]  Donald de B. Beaver,et al.  Reflections on Scientific Collaboration (and its study): Past, Present, and Future , 2001, Scientometrics.

[35]  Stuart Dillon,et al.  Authorship patterns in information systems , 1997, Scientometrics.

[36]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Out of Sight, Out of Sync: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[37]  D J PRICE,et al.  NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS. , 1965, Science.

[38]  S. Baldi.  Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations : A network-analytic model , 1998 .

[39]  Henry G. Small,et al.  On the shoulders of Robert Merton: Towards a normative theory of citation , 2004, Scientometrics.

[40]  Denice Adkins,et al.  Scholarly productivity of U.S. LIS faculty , 2006 .

[41]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Collaboration in information and library science doctoral education , 2011 .

[42]  R. Rousseau.  Why am I not cited or, Why are multi-authored papers more cited than others? , 1992 .

[43]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Greatness: Who Makes History and Why , 1994 .

[44]  Diana Hicks,et al.  How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model , 1997, Scientometrics.

[45]  A. Heffner.  Authorship Recognition of Subordinates in Collaborative Research , 1979 .

[46]  D. Price,et al.  Collaboration in an invisible college. , 1966, The American psychologist.

[47]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Organizational Demography: The Differential Effects of Age and Tenure Distributions on Technical Communication , 1989 .

[48]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Distance Matters , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[49]  Susan Bonzi,et al.  Trends in Research Productivity Among Senior Faculty , 1992, Inf. Process. Manag..

[50]  Nick Haslam,et al.  Predicting Long-Term Citation Impact of Articles in Social and Personality Psychology , 2010, Psychological reports.

[51]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Collaborative Research Across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries , 2005 .

[52]  Mapheus Smith.  The trend toward multiple authorship in psychology. , 1958 .

[53]  D. Simonton.  Creativity in Science: Chance, Logic, Genius, and Zeitgeist , 2004 .

[54]  J. S. Katz,et al.  What is research collaboration , 1997 .

[55]  Susan E. Cozzens,et al.  What do citations count? the rhetoric-first model , 1989, Scientometrics.

[56]  Sam Wilson,et al.  What makes an article influential? Predicting impact in social and personality psychology , 2008, Scientometrics.

[57]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance , 2005, Science.

[58]  Jesús Rey-Rocha,et al.  Team consolidation, social integration and scientists’ research performance: An empirical study in the Biology and Biomedicine field , 2008, Scientometrics.

[59]  Debora Shaw,et al.  Publication and citation patterns among LIS faculty : Profiling a typical professor , 2008 .

[60]  J. E. Cohen,et al.  Size, age and productivity of scientific and technical research groups , 1991, Scientometrics.

[61]  R. Boschma.  Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment , 2005 .

[62]  Chu Keong Lee,et al.  A scientometric study of the research performance of the Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology in Singapore , 2004, Scientometrics.

[63]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  Citation-Based Auditing of Academic Performance , 1994, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[64]  Donald de B. Beaver,et al.  Does collaborative research have greater epistemic authority? , 2004, Scientometrics.

[65]  October I.  Physical Review Letters , 2022 .

[66]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance , 1992 .

[67]  R. Jackson,et al.  The Matthew Effect in Science , 1988, International journal of dermatology.

[68]  Elizabeth A. Corley,et al.  Scientists' collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital , 2004 .

[69]  Lokman I. Meho,et al.  Timelines of creativity: A study of intellectual innovators in information science , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[70]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  How to Make the Team: Social Networks vs. Demography as Criteria for Designing Effective Teams , 2004 .

[71]  G. Bowker,et al.  Human capital heterogeneity, collaborative relationships, and publication patterns in a multidisciplinary scientific alliance: a comparative case study of two scientific teams , 2004 .

[72]  Jeremy P. Birnholtz,et al.  What does it mean to be an author? The intersection of credit, contribution, and collaboration in science , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[73]  S. M. Lawani,et al.  Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research , 2005, Scientometrics.