Techno-Economic Analysis of a Small-Scale Biomass-to-Energy BFB Gasification-Based System

In order to limit global warming to around 1.5–2.0 °C by the end of the 21st century, there is the need to drastically limit the emissions of CO2. This goal can be pursued by promoting the diffusion of advanced technologies for power generation from renewable energy sources. In this field, biomass can play a very important role since, differently from solar and wind, it can be considered a programmable source. This paper reports a techno-economic analysis on the possible commercial application of gasification technologies for small-scale (2 MWe) power generation from biomass. The analysis is based on the preliminary experimental performance of a 500 kWth pilot-scale air-blown bubbling fluidized-bed (BFB) gasification plant, recently installed at the Sotacarbo Research Centre (Italy) and commissioned in December 2017. The analysis confirms that air-blown BFB biomass gasification can be profitable for the applications with low-cost biomass, such as agricultural waste, with a net present value up to about 6 M€ as long as the biomass is provided for free; on the contrary, the technology is not competitive for high-quality biomass (wood chips, as those used for the preliminary experimental tests). In parallel, an analysis of the financial risk was carried out, in order to estimate the probability of a profitable investment if a variation of the key financial parameters occurs. In particular, the analysis shows a probability of 90% of a NPV at 15 years between 1.4 and 5.1 M€ and an IRR between 11.6% and 23.7%.

[1]  M. Santarelli,et al.  Synthetic diesel production as a form of renewable energy storage , 2018 .

[2]  Dino Musmarra,et al.  Biofuels Production by Biomass Gasification: A Review , 2018 .

[3]  Haimiao Yu,et al.  Characteristics of tar formation during cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin gasification , 2014 .

[4]  Dipal Baruah,et al.  Modeling of biomass gasification: A review , 2014 .

[6]  Umberto Arena,et al.  Energy generation by air gasification of two industrial plastic wastes in a pilot scale fluidized bed reactor , 2014 .

[7]  F. Dessi,et al.  Air- and oxygen-blown characterization of coal and biomass by thermogravimetric analysis , 2018 .

[8]  B. Chachuat,et al.  Enviro-economic assessment of thermochemical polygeneration from microalgal biomass , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[9]  Ahsanullah Soomro,et al.  Catalytic activities of nickel, dolomite, and olivine for tar removal and H2-enriched gas production in biomass gasification process , 2018 .

[10]  Umberto Arena,et al.  A techno-economic comparison between two design configurations for a small scale, biomass-to-energy gasification based system , 2010 .

[11]  R. M. Filho,et al.  Biomass gasification in fluidized beds: A review of biomass moisture content and operating pressure effects , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[12]  Filippo Sgroi,et al.  Economic assessment of Eucalyptus (spp.) for biomass production as alternative crop in Southern Italy , 2015 .

[13]  Jingwei Zheng,et al.  Biomass-to-Methanol by dual-stage entrained flow gasification: Design and techno-economic analysis based on system modeling , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[14]  Vittorio Tola,et al.  Power generation plants with carbon capture and storage: A techno-economic comparison between coal combustion and gasification technologies , 2014 .

[15]  Chang-Tang Chang,et al.  Thermo-economic analyses of a Taiwanese combined CHP system fuelled with syngas from rice husk gasification , 2019, Energy.

[16]  Hermann Hofbauer,et al.  Experimental investigations of hydrogen production from CO catalytic conversion of tar rich syngas by biomass gasification , 2016 .

[17]  Calin-Cristian Cormos,et al.  Techno-Economic Evaluations of Copper-Based Chemical Looping Air Separation System for Oxy-Combustion and Gasification Power Plants with Carbon Capture , 2018, Energies.

[18]  G. Scheffknecht,et al.  Comparison measurements of tar content in gasification systems between an online method and the tar protocol , 2017 .

[19]  Francesca Ferrara,et al.  The Sotacarbo gasification pilot platform: Plant overview, recent experimental results and potential future integrations , 2015 .

[20]  Zsolt Dobó,et al.  Experimental characterization of a high sulfur Hungarian brown coal for its potential industrial applications , 2014 .

[21]  Michel Noussan,et al.  Performance Indicators of Electricity Generation at Country Level : The Case of Italy , 2018 .

[22]  Enrico Zio,et al.  The future of risk assessment , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[23]  Oscar Almazán del Olmo,et al.  Reduction of tar generated during biomass gasification: A review , 2018 .

[24]  N. Massarotti,et al.  Modelling approaches to biomass gasification: A review with emphasis on the stoichiometric method , 2017 .

[25]  S. I. Freedman,et al.  Gas-Fired Distributed Energy Resource Technology Characterizations , 2003 .

[26]  M. Daramola,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of electricity and heat production by co-gasification of coal, biomass and waste tyre in South Africa , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[27]  Sang Yeop Lee,et al.  Effects of Oxygen Enrichment in Air Oxidants on Biomass Gasification Efficiency and the Reduction of Tar Emissions , 2018, Energies.

[28]  M. Jaafar,et al.  Progress in biomass gasification technique – With focus on Malaysian palm biomass for syngas production , 2016 .

[29]  L. Tarelho,et al.  Characteristics of the gas produced during biomass direct gasification in an autothermal pilot-scale bubbling fluidized bed reactor , 2017 .

[30]  Umberto Arena,et al.  Process and technological aspects of municipal solid waste gasification. A review. , 2012, Waste management.

[31]  H. Moll,et al.  Opportunities and Barriers for Biomass Gasification for Green Gas in the Dutch Residential Sector , 2018, Energies.

[32]  Vittorio Tola,et al.  Techno-economic comparison between different technologies for CO2-free power generation from coal , 2017 .

[33]  Nianping Li,et al.  Thermodynamic and economic analysis of biomass partial gasification process , 2018 .

[34]  G. Feijoo,et al.  Integrating uncertainties to the combined environmental and economic assessment of algal biorefineries: A Monte Carlo approach. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[35]  Henrik Thunman,et al.  Comparing Active Bed Materials in a Dual Fluidized Bed Biomass Gasifier: Olivine, Bauxite, Quartz-Sand, and Ilmenite , 2016 .

[36]  U. Arena,et al.  Gasification of a solid recovered fuel in a pilot scale fluidized bed reactor , 2014 .

[37]  Erik Dahlquist,et al.  EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT BIOMASS GASIFICATION MODELING APPROACHES FOR FLUIDIZED BED GASIFIERS , 2016 .

[38]  Tobias Pröll,et al.  Steam gasification of biomass in dual fluidized bed gasifiers: A review , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[39]  Feng Jin,et al.  Improving risk assessment in financial feasibility of international engineering projects: A risk driver perspective , 2017 .

[40]  Dino Musmarra,et al.  Biomass gasification technology: The state of the art overview , 2016 .