Brain modularity controls the critical behavior of spontaneous activity

The human brain exhibits a complex structure made of scale-free highly connected modules loosely interconnected by weaker links to form a small-world network. These features appear in healthy patients whereas neurological diseases often modify this structure. An important open question concerns the role of brain modularity in sustaining the critical behaviour of spontaneous activity. Here we analyse the neuronal activity of a model, successful in reproducing on non-modular networks the scaling behaviour observed in experimental data, on a modular network implementing the main statistical features measured in human brain. We show that on a modular network, regardless the strength of the synaptic connections or the modular size and number, activity is never fully scale-free. Neuronal avalanches can invade different modules which results in an activity depression, hindering further avalanche propagation. Critical behaviour is solely recovered if inter-module connections are added, modifying the modular into a more random structure.

[1]  Lucilla de Arcangelis,et al.  Modelling the brain as Apollonian network , .

[2]  E A Leicht,et al.  Suppressing cascades of load in interdependent networks , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  V. Torre,et al.  On the Dynamics of the Spontaneous Activity in Neuronal Networks , 2007, PloS one.

[4]  Stanley,et al.  Self-organized branching processes: Avalanche models with dissipation. , 1996, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[5]  L. de Arcangelis,et al.  Self-organized criticality model for brain plasticity. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[6]  C. Stam,et al.  Small‐world properties of nonlinear brain activity in schizophrenia , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[7]  L. de Arcangelis,et al.  Learning as a phenomenon occurring in a critical state , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  S. Royer,et al.  Conservation of total synaptic weight through balanced synaptic depression and potentiation , 2003, Nature.

[9]  John M. Beggs,et al.  Neuronal Avalanches in Neocortical Circuits , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  L. L. Bologna,et al.  Self-organization and neuronal avalanches in networks of dissociated cortical neurons , 2008, Neuroscience.

[11]  Changsong Zhou,et al.  Sustained Activity in Hierarchical Modular Neural Networks: Self-Organized Criticality and Oscillations , 2010, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[12]  Amir Ayali,et al.  The formation of synchronization cliques during the development of modular neural networks , 2009, Physical biology.

[13]  Hans J. Herrmann,et al.  Activity-Dependent Neuronal Model on Complex Networks , 2012, Front. Physio..

[14]  Mariano Sigman,et al.  A small world of weak ties provides optimal global integration of self-similar modules in functional brain networks , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  C. Stam,et al.  Disturbed functional connectivity in brain tumour patients: Evaluation by graph analysis of synchronization matrices , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[16]  Dante R. Chialvo,et al.  What kind of noise is brain noise: anomalous scaling behavior of the resting brain activity fluctuations , 2010, Front. Physio..

[17]  John M. Beggs,et al.  Behavioral / Systems / Cognitive Neuronal Avalanches Are Diverse and Precise Activity Patterns That Are Stable for Many Hours in Cortical Slice Cultures , 2004 .

[18]  Ruedi Stoop,et al.  Beyond scale-free small-world networks: cortical columns for quick brains. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[19]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  The small world of the cerebral cortex , 2007, Neuroinformatics.

[20]  J. M. Herrmann,et al.  Dynamical synapses causing self-organized criticality in neural networks , 2007, 0712.1003.

[21]  L. de Arcangelis,et al.  Modelling the brain as a n Apollonian network , 2007 .

[22]  H E Stanley,et al.  Towards design principles for optimal transport networks. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[23]  Richard Coppola,et al.  Neuronal avalanches in the resting MEG of the human brain , 2012 .

[24]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Navigation in a small world , 2000, Nature.

[25]  D. Plenz,et al.  Neuronal avalanches organize as nested theta- and beta/gamma-oscillations during development of cortical layer 2/3 , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  B. Roerig,et al.  Relationships of local inhibitory and excitatory circuits to orientation preference maps in ferret visual cortex. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  Stefan Mihalas,et al.  Self-organized criticality occurs in non-conservative neuronal networks during Up states , 2010, Nature physics.

[28]  D. Plenz,et al.  Spontaneous cortical activity in awake monkeys composed of neuronal avalanches , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Stanley,et al.  Self-organized branching processes: Mean-field theory for avalanches. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[30]  D. Plenz,et al.  Balance between excitation and inhibition controls the temporal organization of neuronal avalanches. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[31]  J. S. Andrade,et al.  Optimal transport exponent in spatially embedded networks. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[32]  Carla Perrone-Capano,et al.  Activity-dependent neural network model on scale-free networks. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[33]  G. Cecchi,et al.  Scale-free brain functional networks. , 2003, Physical review letters.