Circulating Cell-Free DNA-Based Liquid Biopsy Markers for the Non-Invasive Prognosis and Monitoring of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

Liquid biopsy may assist in the management of cancer patients, which can be particularly applicable in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In this study, we investigated the utility of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA)-based markers as prognostic tools in metastatic PDAC. Plasma was obtained from 61 metastatic PDAC patients, and cfDNA levels and fragmentation were determined. BEAMing technique was used for quantitative determination of RAS mutation allele fraction (MAF) in cfDNA. We found that the prognosis was more accurately predicted by RAS mutation detection in plasma than in tissue. RAS mutation status in plasma was a strong independent prognostic factor for both overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Moreover, RAS MAF in cfDNA was also an independent risk factor for poor OS, and was strongly associated with primary tumours in the body/tail of the pancreas and liver metastases. Higher cfDNA levels and fragmentation were also associated with poorer OS and shorter PFS, body/tail tumors, and hepatic metastases, whereas cfDNA fragmentation positively correlated with RAS MAF. Remarkably, the combination of CA19-9 with MAF, cfDNA levels and fragmentation improved the prognostic stratification of patients. Furthermore, dynamics of RAS MAF better correlated with patients’ outcome than standard CA19-9 marker. In conclusion, our study supports the use of cfDNA-based liquid biopsy markers as clinical tools for the non-invasive prognosis and monitoring of metastatic PDAC patients.

[1]  M. Speicher,et al.  Cell-Free DNA and Apoptosis: How Dead Cells Inform About the Living. , 2020, Trends in molecular medicine.

[2]  P. Brennan,et al.  Circulating tumour-derived KRAS mutations in pancreatic cancer cases are predominantly carried by very short fragments of cell-free DNA , 2020, EBioMedicine.

[3]  Jian-Hua Tong,et al.  KRAS Mutant Allele Fraction in Circulating Cell-Free DNA Correlates With Clinical Stage in Pancreatic Cancer Patients , 2019, Front. Oncol..

[4]  L. Wood,et al.  Liquid Biopsy as Surrogate for Tissue for Molecular Profiling in Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Towards Precision Medicine , 2019, Cancers.

[5]  S. Barni,et al.  Outcome of head compared to body and tail pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 93 studies. , 2019, Journal of gastrointestinal oncology.

[6]  A. Vivancos,et al.  Comparison of the Clinical Sensitivity of the Idylla Platform and the OncoBEAM RAS CRC Assay for KRAS Mutation Detection in Liquid Biopsy Samples , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[7]  F. Bertucci,et al.  Head and Body/Tail Pancreatic Carcinomas Are Not the Same Tumors , 2019, Cancers.

[8]  C. V. van Eijck,et al.  Circulating Biomarkers for Prediction of Objective Response to Chemotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer Patients , 2019, Cancers.

[9]  A. Maitra,et al.  Circulating Nucleic Acids Are Associated With Outcomes of Patients With Pancreatic Cancer. , 2019, Gastroenterology.

[10]  Samuel C. Belete,et al.  Circulating Tumor Cells and Cell-Free DNA in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. , 2019, The American journal of pathology.

[11]  M. Javle,et al.  Fragment size and level of cell-free DNA provide prognostic information in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer , 2018, Journal of Translational Medicine.

[12]  A. Gavin,et al.  Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers in 2018. , 2018, European journal of cancer.

[13]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries , 2018, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[14]  Channing J Der,et al.  KRAS: The Critical Driver and Therapeutic Target for Pancreatic Cancer. , 2018, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine.

[15]  Dae-Soon Son,et al.  Utility of targeted deep sequencing for detecting circulating tumor DNA in pancreatic cancer patients , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[16]  V. Lemmens,et al.  Association of the location of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (head, body, tail) with tumor stage, treatment, and survival: a population-based analysis , 2018, Acta oncologica.

[17]  E. Sabo,et al.  Mutant KRAS Circulating Tumor DNA Is an Accurate Tool for Pancreatic Cancer Monitoring. , 2018, The oncologist.

[18]  Mathias J Friedrich,et al.  Evolutionary routes and KRAS dosage define pancreatic cancer phenotypes , 2018, Nature.

[19]  P. Mundra,et al.  Plasma total cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a surrogate biomarker for tumour burden and a prognostic biomarker for survival in metastatic melanoma patients , 2018, European journal of cancer.

[20]  A. Biankin,et al.  Defining the molecular pathology of pancreatic body and tail adenocarcinoma , 2018, The British journal of surgery.

[21]  M. Erlander,et al.  Ultrasensitive plasma ctDNA KRAS assay for detection, prognosis, and assessment of therapeutic response in patients with unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma , 2017, Oncotarget.

[22]  E. Hiyama,et al.  Prognostic value of circulating tumour DNA in patients undergoing curative resection for pancreatic cancer , 2016, British Journal of Cancer.

[23]  J. Søreide,et al.  Clinical relevance of circulating KRAS mutated DNA in plasma from patients with advanced pancreatic cancer , 2016, Molecular oncology.

[24]  M. Ychou,et al.  Circulating DNA as a Strong Multimarker Prognostic Tool for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patient Management Care , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.

[25]  D. Sargent,et al.  Analysis of circulating DNA and protein biomarkers to predict the clinical activity of regorafenib and assess prognosis in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective, exploratory analysis of the CORRECT trial. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[26]  K. Nouso,et al.  Detection of K‐ras gene mutation by liquid biopsy in patients with pancreatic cancer , 2015, Cancer.

[27]  A. Stenzinger,et al.  Allelic ratio of KRAS mutations in pancreatic cancer. , 2015, The oncologist.

[28]  I. Park,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of Pancreatic Lesions , 2015, Journal of pathology and translational medicine.

[29]  P. Bottoni,et al.  CA 19-9: Biochemical and Clinical Aspects. , 2015, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[30]  Benjamin D. Smith,et al.  Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. , 2014, Cancer research.

[31]  P. Philip,et al.  Carbohydrate antigen 19‐9 is a prognostic and predictive biomarker in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who receive gemcitabine‐containing chemotherapy , 2013, Cancer.

[32]  C. Prendergast,et al.  The anatomic location of pancreatic cancer is a prognostic factor for survival. , 2008, HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association.

[33]  Wolfgang Schima,et al.  Pancreatic adenocarcinoma , 2006, European Radiology.

[34]  A. Norman,et al.  CA19-9 as a prognostic factor in inoperable pancreatic cancer: the implication for clinical trials , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.

[35]  E. Saad,et al.  Pretreatment CA 19-9 level as a prognostic factor in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine , 2002, International journal of gastrointestinal cancer.

[36]  L. Schneck Biochemical and Clinical Aspects , 1975 .