The Use of State Tax Incentives to Promote Forest Preservation on Private Lands in Tennessee: An Evaluation of Their Equity and Effectiveness Impacts

This study of Tennessee's tax incentive program for nonindnstrial forest preservation on private lands provides perhaps the most thorough empirical analysis available of this type of public program. First, the program's equity consequences are analyzed by examining both the concentration of land ownership and of subsidy benefits among program participants. Second, its effectiveness is evaluated by estimating the impact of the program under differing sets of assumptions about preferred selling prices and through a survey and comparison of a matched set of program participants and nonparticipants concerning their land use practices and attitudes. The study concludes with recommendations for tax policy reforms to create a better balance between public and private benefits, especially the expansion of program objectives to include biological diversity conservation and other non-commodity-based values.

[1]  R. Gottfried,et al.  State Policies and the Preservation of Forest Cover: Lessons from Contrasting Public-Policy Regimes in Costa Rica , 2002, Latin American Research Review.

[2]  M. Barany,et al.  Industries in Transition: Forestry and Forest Products in China , 2001 .

[3]  L. Fish,et al.  Massachusetts family forests - Birth of a landowner cooperative , 2001 .

[4]  Michael A. Kilgore,et al.  Monitoring compliance with BMPs: The experience of state forestry agencies , 2001 .

[5]  C. Brockett,et al.  NIPF Tax Incentives: Do They Make a Difference? , 1999 .

[6]  Max D. Larsen,et al.  In the mainstream: environmental attitudes of mid-south forest owners. , 1997 .

[7]  B. English,et al.  Stewardship Incentives in Forestry: Participation Factors in Tennessee , 1997 .

[8]  Scott D. Roberts,et al.  Nonindustrial Private Forest Owners and Ecosystem Management: Can They Work Together? , 1996, Journal of Forestry.

[9]  P. J. Parks,et al.  Preserving Agricultural Land with Farmland Assessment: New Jersey as a Case Study , 1996, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[10]  T. Temel,et al.  Search Theory Risk Preference and Farmland Preservation , 1996, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[11]  S. Campbell,et al.  Ecosystem-Based Management on Multiple NIPF Ownerships , 1996, Journal of Forestry.

[12]  Farong Li,et al.  Effectiveness of Use-value Assessment in Preserving Farmland: A Search-theoretic Approach , 1995, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[13]  J. Loomis,et al.  An economic assessment of hardwoods as habitat components for black-tailed deer in northern California conifer forests. , 1995 .

[14]  A. Luloff,et al.  Attitudes toward the management of nonindustrial private forest land , 1994 .

[15]  A. Egan,et al.  Do Landowner Practices Reflect Beliefs?: Implications of an Extension-Research Partnership , 1993 .

[16]  John E. Anderson,et al.  Use-Value Property Tax Assessment: Effects on Land Development , 1993 .

[17]  Arthur Christian Nelson,et al.  Preserving Prime Farmland in the Face of Urbanization: Lessons from Oregon , 1992 .

[18]  C. Hickman Property tax impacts of current-use assessment of forest and other rural land in Tennessee , 1982 .