Admission decisions frequently rely on multiple assessments. As a consequence, it is important to explore rational approaches to combine the information from different educational tests. For example, U.S. graduate schools usually receive both TOEFL iBT® scores and GRE® General scores of foreign applicants for admission; however, little guidance has been given to combine information from these two assessments, even though the relationships between such sections as GRE Verbal and TOEFL iBT Reading are obvious. In this study, principles are provided to explore the extent to which different assessments complement one another and are distinguishable. Augmentation approaches developed for individual tests are applied to provide an accurate evaluation of combined assessments. Because augmentation methods require estimates of measurement error and internal reliability data are unavailable, required estimates of measurement error are obtained from repeaters, examinees who took the same test more than once. Because repeaters are not representative of all examinees in typical assessments, minimum discriminant information adjustment techniques are applied to the available sample of repeaters to treat the effect of selection bias. To illustrate methodology, combining information from TOEFL iBT scores and GRE General scores is examined. Analysis suggests that information from the GRE General and TOEFL iBT assessments is complementary but not redundant, indicating that the two tests measure related but somewhat different constructs. The proposed methodology can be readily applied to other situations where multiple assessments are needed.
[1]
R. A. Leibler,et al.
On Information and Sufficiency
,
1951
.
[2]
Shelby J. Haberman,et al.
Linear Prediction of a True Score From a Direct Estimate and Several Derived Estimates
,
2007
.
[3]
Shelby J. Haberman,et al.
Adjustment by Minimum Discriminant Information
,
1984
.
[4]
J. R. Lockwood,et al.
Inverse probability weighting with error-prone covariates.
,
2013,
Biometrika.
[5]
Shelby J. Haberman,et al.
Use of e‐rater® in Scoring of the TOEFL iBT® Writing Test
,
2011
.
[6]
Kathleen M. Sheehan,et al.
Some Paths Toward Making Praxis Scores More Useful
,
1998
.
[7]
D. Horvitz,et al.
A Generalization of Sampling Without Replacement from a Finite Universe
,
1952
.
[8]
W. Deming,et al.
On a Least Squares Adjustment of a Sampled Frequency Table When the Expected Marginal Totals are Known
,
1940
.
[9]
S. Haberman.
WHEN CAN SUBSCORES HAVE VALUE
,
2005
.
[10]
D. Lawley.
IV.—A Note on Karl Pearson's Selection Formulæ
,
1944,
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. Section A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.
[11]
M. J. Kolen,et al.
Conditional Standard Errors of Measurement for Scale Scores Using IRT
,
1996
.
[12]
Nancy L. Allen,et al.
Standard Errors of Correlations Adjusted for Incidental Selection
,
1989
.
[13]
Karl Pearson,et al.
Mathematical Contributions to the Theory of Evolution. XI. On the Influence of Natural Selection on the Variability and Correlation of Organs
,
1903
.