Investigating agent influence and nested other-agent behaviour

Stit theory, the notion of an agent’s capacity for guaranteeing – or s-eeing t-o it – that a state of affairs arrives, provides a rich semantic framework for manipulating agent ability. However, the syntax of stit readily allows for nesting and such nested statements are not easily imbued with meaning. In this article, and in related work, we introduce and explore a partial logical characterisation of an alternative reading for stit based on a novel interpretation of agent influence that allows meaningful nested agent expressions. Keywords-Cooperative systems; Stochastic logic; Stochastic automata; Adaptive systems;

[1]  Danny Weyns,et al.  Model for situated multi-agent systems with regional synchronization , 2003, ISPE CE.

[2]  J. Ferber,et al.  Influences and Reaction : a Model of Situated Multiagent Systems , 2001 .

[3]  Olivier Simonin,et al.  Generic Expression in B of the Influence/Reaction Model: Specifying and Verifying Situated Multi-Agent Systems , 2007 .

[4]  J. Horty Agency and Deontic Logic , 2001 .

[5]  Brian F. Chellas Modal Logic: Normal systems of modal logic , 1980 .

[6]  Kevin G. Waugh,et al.  Towards Mining for Influence in a Multi Agent Environment , 2008, IADIS European Conf. Data Mining.

[7]  R. Thomason Combinations of Tense and Modality , 2002 .

[8]  Kevin G. Waugh,et al.  Agent Influence and Nested Other-Agent Behaviour , 2009, 2009 Computation World: Future Computing, Service Computation, Cognitive, Adaptive, Content, Patterns.

[9]  Richmond H. Thomason,et al.  Indeterminist time and truth‐value gaps1 , 2008 .

[10]  Robin Milner,et al.  Communication and concurrency , 1989, PHI Series in computer science.

[11]  Kevin G. Waugh,et al.  Reactive Food Gathering , 2005, CLIMA.

[12]  A. Roadmapof A Roadmap of Agent Research and Development , 1995 .

[13]  Fabien Michel,et al.  The IRM4S model: the influence/reaction principle for multiagent based simulation , 2007, AAMAS '07.

[14]  D. Clarke The logical form of imperatives , 1975 .

[15]  D. Holdstock Past, present--and future? , 2005, Medicine, conflict, and survival.

[16]  Nicolas Halbwachs,et al.  Synchronous Programming of Reactive Systems , 1992, CAV.

[17]  Brian F. Chellas Time and modality in the logic of agency , 1992, Stud Logica.

[18]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  Cambrian Intelligence: The Early History of the New AI , 1999 .

[19]  N. Belnap,et al.  Facing the Future: Agents and Choices in Our Indeterminist World , 2001 .

[20]  Sven Ove Hansson Situationist Deontic Logic , 1997, J. Philos. Log..

[21]  Robert Logie,et al.  A study of agent influence in nested agent interactions , 2010 .

[22]  Nuel Belnap,et al.  The deliberative stit: A study of action, omission, ability, and obligation , 1995, J. Philos. Log..

[23]  Nuel D. Belnap,et al.  Seeing To it That: A Canonical Form for Agentives , 2008 .