Estimation of Background Serum 2,3,7,8-TCDD Concentrations By Using Quantile Regression in the UMDES and NHANES Populations

Background: The goal of the present study was to quantify the population-based background serum concentrations of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) by using data from the reference population of the 2005 University of Michigan Dioxin Exposure Study (UMDES) and the 2003-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Methods: Multiple imputation was used to impute the serum TCDD concentrations below the limit of detection by combining the 2 data sources. The background mean, quartiles, and 95th percentile serum TCDD concentrations were estimated by age and sex by using linear and quantile regressions for complex survey data. Results: Any age- and sex-specific mean, quartiles, and 95th percentiles of background serum TCDD concentrations of study participants between ages 18 and 85 years can be estimated from the regressions for the UMDES reference population and the NHANES non-Hispanic white population. For example, for a 50-year-old man in the reference population of UMDES, the mean, quartiles, and 95th percentile serum TCDD concentrations are estimated to be 1.1, 0.6, 1.1, 1.8, and 3.3 parts per trillion, respectively. The study also shows that the UMDES reference population is a valid reference population for serum TCDD concentrations for other predominantly white populations in Michigan. Conclusion: The serum TCDD concentrations increased with age and increased more over age in women than in men, and hence estimation of background concentrations must be adjusted for age and sex. The methods and results discussed in this article have wide application in studies of the concentrations of chemicals in human serum and in environmental samples.

[1]  U. Ewers,et al.  Decrease of PCDD/F levels in human blood from Germany over the past ten years (1989-1998). , 2000, Chemosphere.

[2]  D. Phillips,et al.  Chlorinated hydrocarbon levels in human serum: Effects of fasting and feeding , 1989, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[3]  Richard Canady,et al.  Age Specific Dioxin TEQ Reference Range , 2004 .

[4]  Lawrence H. Keith,et al.  Principles of environmental analysis , 1983 .

[5]  Nathaniel Schenker,et al.  Combining Information From Two Surveys to Estimate County-Level Prevalence Rates of Cancer Risk Factors and Screening , 2007 .

[6]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[7]  O. Jolliet,et al.  Apparent Half-Lives of Dioxins, Furans, and Polychlorinated Biphenyls as a Function of Age, Body Fat, Smoking Status, and Breast-Feeding , 2008, Environmental health perspectives.

[8]  John Van Hoewyk,et al.  A multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a sequence of regression models , 2001 .

[9]  S. Caudill,et al.  Total TEQ reference range (PCDDs, PCDFs, cPCBs, mono-PCBs) for the US population 2001-2002. , 2008, Chemosphere.

[10]  J. Stoker,et al.  The Department of Health and Human Services. , 1999, Home healthcare nurse.

[11]  Jinho Jung,et al.  Quantification of differentially expressed genes in Daphnia magna exposed to rubber wastewater. , 2008, Chemosphere.

[12]  Enrique F Schisterman,et al.  The limitations due to exposure detection limits for regression models. , 2006, American journal of epidemiology.

[13]  R. Hornung,et al.  Estimation of Average Concentration in the Presence of Nondetectable Values , 1990 .

[14]  K F Rust,et al.  Variance estimation for complex surveys using replication techniques , 1996, Statistical methods in medical research.

[15]  Peter Adriaens,et al.  The University of Michigan Dioxin Exposure Study: Predictors of Human Serum Dioxin Concentrations in Midland and Saginaw, Michigan , 2008, Environmental health perspectives.