Posterior Probability Profiles for the Automated Assessment of the Recovery of Stroke Patients

Assessing recovery from stroke has been so far a time consuming procedure in which highly trained clinicians are required. This paper proposes a mechatronic platform which measures low forces and torques exerted by subjects, Class posterior probabilities are used as a quantitative and statistically sound tool to assess motor recovery from these force and torque measurements. The performance of the patients is expressed in terms of the posterior probability to belong to the class of normal subjects. The mechatronic platform together with the class posterior probabilities enables to automate motor recovery assessment without the need for highly trained clinicians. It is shown that the class posterior probability profiles are highly correlated, r ≈ 0.8, with the well-established Fugl-Meyer scale assessment in motor recovery. These results have been obtained through careful feature subset selection procedures in order to prune the large feature set being generated. The overall approach is general and can be applied to many other health monitoring systems where different categories (diseased vs. healthy) can be identified.

[1]  M. Kornitzer,et al.  The World Health Organization MONICA Project (Monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease): A major international Collaboration , 1988 .

[2]  A. Kraskov,et al.  Estimating mutual information. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  Pedro M. Domingos,et al.  On the Optimality of the Simple Bayesian Classifier under Zero-One Loss , 1997, Machine Learning.

[4]  M. Munih,et al.  ALLADIN: A Novel Mechatronic Platform Assessing Post-Stroke Functional Recovery , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[5]  S. Black,et al.  The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke: A Critical Review of Its Measurement Properties , 2002, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[6]  R. D'Agostino,et al.  The influence of gender and age on disability following ischemic stroke: the Framingham study. , 2003, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.

[7]  Johan A. K. Suykens,et al.  Least Squares Support Vector Machines , 2002 .

[8]  Luc Devroye,et al.  Combinatorial methods in density estimation , 2001, Springer series in statistics.

[9]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[10]  A. Dromerick,et al.  Predictors of acute hospital costs for treatment of ischemic stroke in an academic center. , 1999, Stroke.

[11]  Prevalence of disabilities and associated health conditions among adults--United States, 1999. , 2001, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[12]  Helmut Ltkepohl,et al.  New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis , 2007 .

[13]  Byung Ro Moon,et al.  Hybrid Genetic Algorithms for Feature Selection , 2004, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[14]  Daphne Koller,et al.  Toward Optimal Feature Selection , 1996, ICML.

[15]  Marc M. Van Hulle,et al.  Speeding Up the Wrapper Feature Subset Selection in Regression by Mutual Information Relevance and Redundancy Analysis , 2006, ICANN.

[16]  J. Carr,et al.  Neurological Rehabilitation: Optimizing Motor Performance , 2003 .

[17]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  Wrappers for Feature Subset Selection , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[18]  P. Wolf,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2006 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2006, Circulation.

[19]  E. Hamrin,et al.  Evaluation of functional capacity after stroke as a basis for active intervention. Presentation of a modified chart for motor capacity assessment and its reliability. , 1988, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[20]  Robert A. Lordo,et al.  Nonparametric and Semiparametric Models , 2005, Technometrics.

[21]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Is the cerebellum a smith predictor? , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.