Automated breast tissue density assessment using high order regional texture descriptors in mammography

Breast cancer is the most common cancer and second leading cause of cancer death among women in the US. The relative survival rate is lower among women with a more advanced stage at diagnosis. Early detection through screening is vital. Mammography is the most widely used and only proven screening method for reliably and effectively detecting abnormal breast tissues. In particular, mammographic density is one of the strongest breast cancer risk factors, after age and gender, and can be used to assess the future risk of disease before individuals become symptomatic. A reliable method for automatic density assessment would be beneficial and could assist radiologists in the evaluation of mammograms. To address this problem, we propose a density classification method which uses statistical features from different parts of the breast. Our method is composed of three parts: breast region identification, feature extraction and building ensemble classifiers for density assessment. It explores the potential of the features extracted from second and higher order statistical information for mammographic density classification. We further investigate the registration of bilateral pairs and time-series of mammograms. The experimental results on 322 mammograms demonstrate that (1) a classifier using features from dense regions has higher discriminative power than a classifier using only features from the whole breast region; (2) these high-order features can be effectively combined to boost the classification accuracy; (3) a classifier using these statistical features from dense regions achieves 75% accuracy, which is a significant improvement from 70% accuracy obtained by the existing approaches.

[1]  Farrukh Nagi,et al.  Automated breast profile segmentation for ROI detection using digital mammograms , 2010, 2010 IEEE EMBS Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences (IECBES).

[2]  Arnau Oliver,et al.  Breast Segmentation with Pectoral Muscle Suppression on Digital Mammograms , 2005, IbPRIA.

[3]  M. Unser Local linear transforms for texture measurements , 1986 .

[4]  Robert Marti,et al.  A Comparison of Breast Tissue Classification Techniques , 2006, MICCAI.

[5]  M. Lux,et al.  Characterizing mammographic images by using generic texture features , 2012, Breast Cancer Research.

[6]  Robert Marti,et al.  A Novel Breast Tissue Density Classification Methodology , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[7]  Stanley R. Sternberg,et al.  Biomedical Image Processing , 1983, Computer.

[8]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  An Anatomically Oriented Breast Coordinate System for Mammogram Analysis , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Bagging Predictors , 1996, Machine Learning.

[10]  Josef Kittler,et al.  Minimum error thresholding , 1986, Pattern Recognit..

[11]  Jingmei Li,et al.  High-throughput mammographic-density measurement: a tool for risk prediction of breast cancer , 2012, Breast Cancer Research.

[12]  Michael D. Abràmoff,et al.  Image processing with ImageJ , 2004 .

[13]  G. Zack,et al.  Automatic measurement of sister chromatid exchange frequency. , 1977, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[14]  Ian W. Ricketts,et al.  The Mammographic Image Analysis Society digital mammogram database , 1994 .

[15]  Nobuyuki Otsu,et al.  ATlreshold Selection Method fromGray-Level Histograms , 1979 .

[16]  Michael Unser,et al.  Sum and Difference Histograms for Texture Classification , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[17]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[18]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[19]  D. Menotti,et al.  Classification of Mammograms by the Breast Composition , 2012 .